TheSandTrap.com  ›  Blog  ›  Clubs  ›  USGA Proposes MOI Limit on Drivers 

USGA Proposes MOI Limit on Drivers

Sep. 1, 2005     By     Comments (5)

The USGA may be looking to cap the MOI in your driver. Hey, at least they're not going after your balls!

USGA LogoE. Michael Johnson of Golf World has published an article which says that the USGA sent a memo yesterday to manufacturers announcing a proposal to limit the moment of inertia (MOI) in drivers. If adopted, the proposal will go into effect March 1, 2006.

Moment of Inertia has been a hot selling item lately… on putters, but its use in drivers has taken a back-seat to two other existing limitations - head size (460cc) and Coefficient of Restitution (or CoR, capped at 0.830). MOI is a measure of a clubhead's ability to resist twisting on off-center hits. High MOI = more forgiving clubs. In March of this year, the USGA said that MOI had tripled in drivers since 1990 (yes, since the persimmon days). The March notice also mentioned three other areas would be looked at: spin generation, MOI, and the adjustability of woods and irons (see: TaylorMade r7 Quad).

Under the latest proposal, drivers (technically "driving clubs," which may or may not include 3-woods and driving irons) would be limited to an MOI of 4,750 g*cm2 for the MOI around the vertical axis through the clubhead center of gravity, plus a tolerance of 50.

The reason for this change? The USGA believes that the clubhead size limitation will not effectively limit increases in MOI, as lighter titaniums become available and more clubmakers shift weight low and away from the clubface to increase MOI. Thus, a separate MOI limit is needed. "We had thought maybe clubs had reached a natural limit on MOI with the head size of 460cc, but with further research and analysis we came to a different conclusion," said USGA senior technical director Dick Rugge.

Golf World goes on to report that most large-headed drivers in the market today are currently in the 4,000 to 4,300 MOI range. Part of the document sent to manufacturers explains the USGA's decision to investigate the MOI limit, saying that "further increases in MOI could reduce the challenge of the game by reducing the skill required to hit the ball straight. In addition, that could also result in an increase in average driving distance by reducing the likelihood that swinging faster will produce a poor result."

Naturally, some clubmakers are pissed. John A. Solheim, chairman and CEO of Ping, says:

They are eliminating the things we can do and I'm worried about the long-term effect on the game and the industry. It scares me. It could have a huge effect on the health of the game. Our kids are not going to be able to get significantly better clubs a few years from now. It's going to get to the point where golf clubs are merely a commodity and it won't matter where they come from or who makes them. The tradition of the game has always included innovation.

Matt Ipsan (whose initials are also "MOI") has more on this story. Hey, Matt, at least they're not going after your balls!

Discussion

  1. Sullivan says:

    This is getting ridiculous. They want to limit the amount of resistance to twisting? They want to protect the difficulty of hitting the ball straight? If the USGA continues to worry only about the pro game and devise rules that make golf harder for weekend players, ultimately weekend players will decide to ignore the USGA's rules. These guys are divorced from reality and will soon render their own organization irrelevant to weekend players.

  2. Unbelievable. So the USGA is just going to shoot down any further technological advances? Great leadership. Way to "protect the game," you pompous combovers. Do something that will impact the miniscule number of scratch golfers in the world, and limit the options available to average golfers.

    Oh, wait. Most average golfers stopped caring what the USGA had to say a long time ago. Never mind.

    I can just see it now. Company X discovers that hardened marshmallow fluff is the perfect material for a super-forgiving new driver design. Within a month, the USGA will have a new "proposed" rule to eliminate marshmallow fluff and restore the sanctity of the game. Innovation? Who needs it? Let's protect par!

    Morons. They are writing one of the last chapters in the history of the USGA with such stupdity. It will be right before the chapter on how the USGA tried to kill tournament golf with the US Open setups.

  3. Travis Penner says:

    There should be some skill required to hit long and strait drives. You shouldn't be able to buy your game. It should be based on skill at all levels. And I'm sure that there will be companies that make non-conforming clubs for those that just want to go out and hit long and strait drives into every par 4 to show how manly they are or how much they can afford to spend on a quick and unsporting addition to their game.

  1. [... E. Michael Johnson of Golf World has published an article which says that the USGA sent a memo yesterday to manufacturers announcing a proposal to limit the moment of inertia ...]

  2. [... E. Michael Johnson of Golf World has published an article which says that the USGA sent a memo yesterday to manufacturers announcing a proposal to limit the moment of inertia ...]

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.