I strongly considered responding to some of the more interesting comments affixed to part one, but I'll remain the catalyst for mudslinging and not a participant in the action which I provoke (which usually seems to be calling me and/or my writing "pointless" or "stupid").
It's nice both to hear words of encouragement and dodge the tomatoes which are being hurled my way. Keep it up. Before I get to the other major points, I'd like to say that one of the main reasons for all the specific "anti-Tiger" complaints is the man's sheer overexposure, and indeed many of his flaws (foul language, relative scarcity, photographer abuse) stem, I think, for his overexposed status. That is, he's asked to don a persona, which is mostly his creation, but which is, to some extent, a washed out facade, all the time.
True, there are great rewards in being "Tiger Woods," but the man also exists within very apparent boundaries, which seem to be ever encroaching, thus his inherently defensive posture. This isn't so much of a justification for behavior, but rather an attempt to identify root causes, for what it's worth.
Anyway, on with the rest of the letter.
Continue reading »