TheSandTrap.com  ›  Blog  ›  Swing Thoughts  ›  Player says New Equipment is Ruining the Game 

Player says New Equipment is Ruining the Game

May. 20, 2005     By     Comments (3)

Gary Player wants to take away the metal clubs used by pros and put wooden clubs in their hands. My reaction? Nice knowing you, Gary. Have fun in La La Land.

Gary Player SwingingI've got all the respect in the world for Gary Player. His record is spotless. Oh, well, except for that cheating thing. But really, Gary Player, a brilliant guy and a great player with a good head on his shoulders. Oh, well, except for those stupid comments he made last week.

Gary Player is asking governing bodies to impose "drastic" restrictions to the equipment used on the professional tours. Says Player, a short hitter even in his prime, "There's not even a debate. There must be a premium on driving." New equipment is "ruining the game of golf."

Player elaborated, saying "I play on the Champions Tour now, and there are guys on it who are shooting scores that they could never shoot when they were young men. It just doesn't make sense, and it's ruining golf."

Never mind that today's senior golfer is better conditioned, or that today's senior tour player is going for millions of dollars. The motivation is there, and so are the exercise regimens. Gary Player, a lifelong health nut, should realize the impact that staying in shape can have on a player's game.

Gary then goes on to talk about his "solution" to the problem: bifurcation. Gary doesn't want to take away your Titleist 905 or your Pro V1x, but he does want to take that equipment out of the hands of the PGA and European Tour members. Why? Because "golf courses are becoming obsolete."

Gary Player's own passage into the realm of obsolete began long ago, yet he labors on: "We mustn't change the equipment for the average golfer, but on the tour, we've got to change things. If an amateur hits a ball 50 yards further, usually that will also mean he is 50 yards further in the rough. But they will get enjoyment out of it, and we have to satisfy them."

Because, as you know, Gary Player is all about satisfying "us." Today's ball is longer and straighter, and Gary's comments reinforce how out of touch he's become with the real world of golf. Not the world of golf inhabited by Jack Nicklaus or Ron Sirak, but the world of golf played by 99.9% of the golfers out there. It's a problem that commonly plagues golf's "talking heads," but Gary Player has tossed in an unhealthy dose of nostalgia as well:

Synopsized Stupidity
The remainder of Player's have me seriously questioning his mental state at the time of the comments. They're quoted in full below along with an appreciably catty response.

I just hate to see what's happening today with golf clubs that I consider to be illegal. I'd stop the grooves being so deep (on the ball), and I'd stop the trampoline effect in the wood.

The way to solve all the problems is to quit making metal clubs and go back to wood, but I say that with tongue in cheek. If you gave Jack Nicklaus the conditions these guys play in now, none of them (modern-day players) could live with him. Also, there's nobody on the tour today who could hit the ball as well as Lee Trevino or Ben Hogan.

If I could somehow transport a 22-year-old Jack Nicklaus to 2005, I'd wager that Nicklaus couldn't win half of his 18 majors. Nicklaus didn't earn the nickname "Ohio Fats" for no reason: he was out of shape, a beer-belly toting "golfer of yester-year" at 22. I don't doubt that Jack would do well for himself, but I'd give him six majors. "Ohio Fats" would simply not be conditioned to play the modern game of golf any more so than Gary Player is equipped to comment upon it.

The point here is simple: Gary Player, sans any factual evidence, is guessing at things, grasping for straws, and trying to push an agenda. Whether that agenda is nostalgic in nature, rooted in his golf course design business, or has its roots in some other realm of his psyche remains to be seen.

All they have to do is spend a little bit of money and change the mold (of the ball) and let the ball go back 30 yards. There are no such things as par-5s now really in professional golf, unless they move the tees back.

Vijay Singh, with 55 rounds under his belt, is -98 on the par 5s he's played. That works out to a scoring average of 4.51, or less than half a stroke better than par, and Vijay is the leader in the category. Tiger Woods is tied for 22nd. In the past ten years, the leader never dropped below 4.44 and was as high as 4.66. These players don't have tap-in birdies at every par 5, despite what Player thinks, and the simplest of investigations bears out that argument.

I'll leave Player's understanding of the equipment making process alone. If you believe reducing the distance a ball travels by 30 yards is as simple as "changing a mold,", then I've got some oceanfront property here in Erie, PA to sell you.

The Same Old Distance Debate
We've covered the "distance debate" several times here at The Sand Trap (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) and no doubt we'll talk about it more. The points of view can typically be broken down into two categories: emotion or fact. Gary Player, seemingly longing for the days of the gutta percha, is making an emotional, fact-less appeal. Gary Player, owner of a golf course design company, thinks that the costs of keeping up with the distance players hit the ball these days is solely the fault of the equipment they're using. After all, as a golf course designer he's forced to build larger, longer golf courses that cut into land previously set aside for real estate sales, eating into the property owner's budget and consequently, his paycheck.

It may not be quite that simple, in fact, but the motivations behind the various talking heads are quite easily illuminated with the simplest of logic, reason, and a few quick trips to Google.

The governing bodies, the golf course developers, the real estate folks, a few golfers who are no longer competitive (including Jack Nicklaus), and a crazy old guy in Georgia are asking that the ball go shorter. Who isn't? The players. You. Me. Golfers.

Gary Player, we bid you adieu, as you've officially crossed the Swilcan Burn bridge to blissful ignorance. Enjoy your stay.

Photo Credit: © NYT.

Discussion

  1. Cody Thrasher says:

    This article just makes me laugh a little. Of course I started watching golf around the time Tiger started playing the PGA Tour, but come on.

    The last time I checked, the tournament scores are still similar to what they have been in the past. -10 is still going to be a strong finish and even win some tournaments. All of the recent tournaments have had decently low scoring.

    Anyone can talk about the equipment, but as long as the courses are playing tough, it shouldn't matter. If everyone is playing the same equipment or have the opportunity to play the same equipment, then everything is fine as far as I'm concerned.

    Nice write-up though. :)

  2. ElGavilan says:

    I can expound on this upon demand. The problem is not length, it's immaculate, wide fairways, kind or no rough, smooth,consistent easy bunkers and absolutely perfect greens.

    Without bothering with the details of today's players with today's equipment on yesterday's couses, the newer course have it all wrong -- they are adding lentgth which adds expense for the initial land purchase and additional maintenance on a day to day basis. To make a course more difficult add trees, higher and nastier rough, slower fairways with longer grass to cut back on spin and roll, difficult greens and inconsistent bunkers. With just some of these things, old courses like Quail Hollow and Shinnecock eat the Tour Pro's lunch.

    Sure, it's equipment and conditioning, but it's also courses and the way they are designed and set up.

  3. Michael Flannery says:

    I side with Player and find little if anything to ridicule in his statements. The overly-long ball is a classic example of the equipment industry wagging the golf dog.

    Unfortunately, Gary didn't also mention the excessive number of clubs. A great opportunity was missed in the 1930's to introduce a manageable number such as seven or eight, which would have ensured shotmaking and required a higher level of individual skill.

    The staggeringly repetitious nature of professional golf is already of stultifying. There is really nothing fresh or original in the game today, and unless a new element of meaningful competition is introduced, golf will find itself with dwindling spectatorship and less coverage from specialist and general media. If you think this can't happen, take a hard look at the demise of Pall-Mall, golf's most influential forefather In its cross-country form (a la chicane), mail was arguably the most skillful of all club and ball games, one that survived a good seven centuries. In the end, the professionals played with such a degree of perfection that not only the betting public, but they themselves were bored with it.

    Look at history before you have another go at the opinion of an insider like Gary Player, who sees the writing on the wall. That you can't is thanks to vested interest and myopia.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.