1995 to 2005 in Numbers

Looking into the past may gives us a better idea what will happen in the future. 11 years worth of data shows us a few things.

The Numbers GameWe’ve seen a lot of things over the last 11 years in golf. Most notably is the emergence of Tiger Woods. But there have been technological advances, course lengthening and a fitness revolution. All of these have had an effect on golf.

Some of these may negate others. Some may not. Hopefully the past numbers over the years will give us a little bit of insight into how future trends of stats will play out. Those who don’t know their history are doomed to repeat it, they say. We can’t save you from such a fate, but we can look back and learn a little about the (possible) future of golf.

Scoring Average
Of all the stats, scoring average was the steadiest. Take a look for yourself:

1995-2005 Scoring

Sure the low average score dipped in 2000 with Tiger’s amazing year, but the average for the entire PGA Tour was a flat line hovering slightly above 71 every year. For all the talk about how tough and long and crazy (i.e. “bikini waxed”) courses have gotten over the years, scoring never took a serious jump in either direction. I don’t know if the PGA Tour is trying to keep this number steady, but they sure are doing a good job of it.

Greens in Regulation (GIR)
GIR is another stat that remained relatively flat. After seeing scoring remain flat, this isn’t a surprise since GIR has been a big component of scoring and earnings.

1995_2005_gir.png

There was another big jump in the high GIR in 2000, again, thanks to Mr. Woods’ stellar year. After that bump, the data slowly drifted back down to where it was in the 90s. It’s pretty easy to make a prediction on this as well:

Average GIR will be within one percentage point of 65%.

Interesting Fact: Tom Lehman’s 33rd place finish in GIR last year was his worst since he has been fully exempt on tour.

Putting
This one was a bit of a surprise. I really thought that putting average was going to, if anything, go slightly up in the past 11 years… but I was wrong.

1995_2005_putting.png

Now I know that this isn’t exactly a meteoric drop, and that PA has actually risen in the past four years, but that actually might be the nugget I was looking for. What I was expecting was a gradual increase in PA over the years as greens have gotten firmer and faster (i.e. Whistling Straights).

Is it possible that “Tiger Proofing” started to take effect in 2001 after the aforementioned year Tiger had? Maybe… and maybe not. I find it interesting though. I’ll be keen to see how this stat continues over not only this year but the following ones. In an age where everyone talks about the long ball, putting should be watched a bit more since it means more to a players score.

Interesting Fact: 119-5-115. Not a lock combination or something from the DaVinci Code, but John Daly’s PA ranking 2003-2005. His rankings from other years are just as crooked as his backswing.

Driving Distance
OK. Here’s a graph with a bit of slope in it. Finally.

1995_2005_dd.png

You can’t tell me you would be surprised to see this. In 11 years, average driving distance has risen from slightly over 260 yards to just under 290: a difference of 25.14 yards to be exact. This has been due to many factors, I won’t go into those since they have been hashed and re-hashed multiple times on this site. Let’s just say that it is not just the ball or course conditions or player conditioning.

For the last few years, the average has been pretty steady though. It jumped in 2003, but the year-over-year increase after that has been nominal. I think that we’ll see more of the same this year. A slight increase to around 290 yards per drive.

Interesting fact: Tiger Woods has never led the PGA Tour in driving distance.

Driving Accuracy (DA)
Here’s another stat that had a bit of a slope. This time in the other direction.

1995_2005_da.png

In the past 11 years, DA has dropped from an average of almost 70% to just under 63% last year. Most of that drop off was seen in the last four years. I have talked about Flogging in a previous Numbers Game and this one of the causes of the decline in DA. The other, in my opinion, is the ever-tightening of courses. Fairways are narrower and courses are changing by adding more obstacles.

I think the trend will continue, but the drop off has gotten sequentially smaller in the previous two years. I’m hoping it will bounce back, but I would expect the average DA this year to be above 62%.

Interesting Fact: Fred Funk has been in the top three in DA all but one of the last 11 years and finished first in seven of those.

3 thoughts on “1995 to 2005 in Numbers”

  1. Great info as always. How about the effect of longer golf courses on the stats like scoring and GIR? Do improved conditions offset the length and shot making impriovements?

    I enjoy the thought provoking information you provide.

  2. Good points. I may try and save and research some of the stats for each of the tournaments this year. That way I can look at GIR/DD/DA/etc by length of course.

    To answer your second question, I think that improved condtions does offset length to some degree. There are a lot of factors at work, but it is definitely one of them. It’s not easy to prove, but it is almost impossible to say that roll has not increased tremendously over the years.

  3. Your stat analysis is most interesting. I wish we could see more of this from “experts” providing opinions in the media or other forums. Long term scrutiny is the only way to really make valid observation. If I may add a comment on driving accuracy, I think the decrease is linked to factors you mentioned, but also to the new risk reward situation: 30 yards more on average makes for easier, shorter recovery shots. I am not original in this remark because we have often heard on TV that longer hitters (ex: Vijay Singh)will use more drivers because getting back with a 9-iron or wedge will be easier or leave you with a short chip shot.

    On the other hand, I think it has become imperative to provide driving distance stats with carry and roll figures. It is useless to lenghten and narrow courses if you are going to give the players concrete fairways. Furthermore this distinction is particularly obvious on the LPGA tour.

    Keep up the interesting work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *