2007 Masters in Numbers

Zach Johnson wins this year’s Masters. How did he do it? Was this the most boring Masters ever? And how’d the staff do in predicting the outcome? Find out.

The Numbers GameThe Masters is over. Zach Johnson is the winner, Tiger Woods failed to mount a Sunday charge (as did most of the rest of the field), and Augusta put up more than a fair fight. So be it.

While we’re between Numbers Game columnist, I thought I’d fill in with some quickie stats from this year’s playing of the U.S. Open, errr, Masters Invitational.

Birdies and Eagles, Oh My!

Lee Westwood and Geoff Ogilvy, T30 and T24 respectively, led with 16 birdies for the week. The field averaged 7.74 birdies for the entire tournament. Among those who made the cut, the average improves to 10.17, or just more than 2½ birdies per 18 holes. The PGA Tour leaders currently average more than 4.0 birdies per round.

Tiger Woods has 5 eagles to his credit this year. Every 57.6 holes, he scores an eagle. Masters contestants racked up only 18 this year despite having some of the most reachable par fives in major championship golf. If we lop off over 30 contestants who didn’t make the cut, that’s 18 birdies in 4320 holes of golf, or 240 holes per eagle. 240 holes per eagle puts you in 90th place on the PGA Tour with Kevin Sutherland. Who? Exactly.

The Course

These numbers speak for themselves:

Rnd     Eagles     Birdies    Pars    Bogeys    Doubles     Others
 1        2          205      991      464        54          12
 2        4          233      980      442        61           8
------- CUT ----------- CUT ----------- CUT ----------- CUT -------
 3        2          107      600      320        42           9
 4       10          175      615      236        35           9

Look at how much traditional pin placements and a little water can affect the numbers between rounds three and four. Eagles were up 500% and Birdies were up 70%.

The per-hole stats are depressing, but you can find them here (at least until the 2008 Masters rolls around).

The 40-30-20-10 Rule

How well did the 40-30-20-10 rule hold up? Given that it’s meant to be applied to a set of stats and not just one tournament, I’d say it held up fairly well. Winner Zach Johnson ranked fifth in GIR, 11th in Putting, and second in driving accuracy. Tiger Woods was 46th of 60 in driving accuracy and 31st in putting (!!!).

The predicted winner? Stuart Appleby, who was third in GIR, 19th in putting, 14th in DD, and 55th in DA. Instead, he finished T7, undone by a single triple-bogey on the 17th hole on Saturday. Zach Johnson clocks in at 2.7th place. Justin Rose and Jerry Kelly, both of whom tied for fifth, were predicted to finish at 18.1th and 20.5th. Justin can thank his 42nd place ranking in GIR and Jerry Kelly his 18th place in GIR and 43rd place in putting. Yow.

Player GIR Putts DD DA Rule Finish
Z. Johnson 4 10 57 2 16.2 1
R. Sabbatini 4 20 15 31 13.7 2
R. Goosen 2 20 12 49 14.1 2
T. Woods 8 28 17 46 19.6 2
J. Rose 35 2 55 31 28.7 5
J. Kelly 14 40 46 49 31.7 5
S. Appleby 2 16 13 53 13.5 7
P. Harrington 43 1 15 23 22.8 7
D. Toms 29 4 46 13 23.3 9
L. Donald 4 28 29 42 20 10
V. Taylor 4 55 22 7 23.2 10
P. Casey 20 34 19 31 25.1 10
V. Singh 10 34 40 7 22.9 13
T. Clark 20 20 50 1 24.1 13
J. Furyk 1 57 44 4 26.7 13
I. Poulter 25 28 49 5 28.7 13
S. Cink 29 7 6 28 17.7 17
H. Stenson 14 28 31 13 21.5 17
T. Pernice jr. 35 20 28 41 29.7 17
M. Calcavecchia 10 34 2 5 15.1 20
J. Rollins 20 16 17 13 17.5 20
L. Glover 20 20 35 42 25.2 20
M. Weir 35 10 25 49 26.9 20
G. Ogilvy 25 14 3 31 17.9 24
S. Ames 35 5 37 19 24.8 24
P. Mickelson 35 34 1 56 30 24
D. Love III 43 12 11 31 26.1 27
A. Scott 10 47 23 49 27.6 27
K. Choi 14 52 43 23 32.1 27
Y. Yang 14 47 4 42 24.7 30
S. Verplank 29 20 37 2 25.2 30
R. Karlsson 19 28 21 53 25.5 30
L. Westwood 51 2 26 23 28.5 30
F. Couples 48 7 10 60 29.3 30
D. Wilson 10 47 54 23 31.2 30
C. Howell III 14 55 24 56 32.5 30
B. Wetterich 8 60 5 53 27.5 37
A. Cabrera 43 40 13 10 32.8 37
J. Singh 35 14 53 42 33 37
R. Pampling 51 16 36 19 34.3 37
T. Herron 55 12 27 38 34.8 37
J. Henry 29 52 33 28 36.6 37
S. Lyle 25 44 44 19 33.9 43
M. Jimenez 25 28 58 10 31 44
D. Howell 35 16 52 38 33 44
B. Dredge 35 40 8 56 33.2 44
S. Katayama 51 20 56 7 38.3 44
J. Olazabal 58 7 51 59 41.4 44
J. Sluman 29 47 48 13 36.6 49
C. Stadler 43 44 59 19 44.1 49
B. Quigley 43 52 30 13 40.1 51
A. Baddeley 48 34 9 23 33.5 52
C. Pettersson 20 58 20 46 34 52
R. Beem 51 34 31 31 39.9 54
N. Fasth 29 47 7 46 31.7 55
B. Crenshaw 59 20 60 10 42.6 55
T. Immelman 55 44 34 38 45.8 55
A. Oberholser 55 40 37 31 44.5 58
B. Mayfair 48 58 41 13 46.1 59
F. Zoeller 60 5 42 28 36.7 60

2007 Masters 40 30 20 10

The Winner

Zach Johnson took 289 strokes (+1) over 72 holes. He was T2 in Driving Accuracy (80.4%) and T4 in Greens in Regulation (61.1%). He was -11 on the par fives without reaching any in two.

Titleist happily points out that in addition to Zach Johnson’s full line of Titleist clubs, Titleist was the #1 ball in play at The Masters as well as the #1 iron in play with 16 (of 96 competitors). The Forged 755 accounted for the most Titleist iron sets, racking up a total of six of the 16. Titleist’s Bob Vokey wedges also took top count in the wedge category with 64 (32%) play, nearly double the 34 of the nearest competitor.

Staff Predictions

Our annual staff predictions are always a hoot. They give us a chance to look like intelligent people or, as is more frequently the case, look as incapable of predicting a winner as crazy Aunt Elma on the day she runs out of her meds.

But never before have we scored the results! Until now.

Being the unbiased guy that I am, I’ve taken it upon myself to score our questions. Using par as a scale, let’s have a look at how we did.

Thoughts on the Course
I’m going to give myself a par here. I talked about the ruination of the course, and the weather and whatnot only managed to exaggerate it. Donald MacKenzie, Dave Koster, and Jack Waddell also tap in for par here.

Alan Olson lips in a birdie putt, calling the course a “tricked up cousin of the U.S. Open.”

Jeff Smith sneaks in with a par, though he had to hole a 10-footer to do so. Be more specific next year, Jeff! Cody Thrasher bogeys by saying the short hitters will be taken out. Many remained long into the tournament, and one of ’em won!

Winner and Score
I picked Tiger, so I bogey right alongside Donald, Jeff, Dave, and Jack. I three-jack for my bogey, though, since I had Zach Johnson on my fantasy team this week.

Alan went with Adam Scott and double bogeys, though I should give him a triple for choosing an Australian. Cody picked a guy (Ernie Els) who didn’t make the cut, earning a triple bogey like the one suffered by Phil Mickelson on the first hole Sunday.

Dark-Horse Winner
I chose Arron Oberholser, who held the lead a few times on Thursday and Friday before falling back. I bogey – he still made the cut.

Jeff, Dave, and Jack, well, I suppose we’ll give them pars for choosing Henrik Stenson, Justin Rose, and Vijay Singh. Each held the leader in the tournament later than Arron.

Cody and Alan double bogey for choosing Steve Stricker. Donald triples for picking Ernie Els – he didn’t make the cut and someone of Ernie’s caliber hardly qualifies as a dark horse!

Biggest Disappointment
I said that Phil Mickelson would “make the cut, but won’t be in serious contention Saturday or Sunday.” I birdie, alongside Jack who also predicted a bad week for Phil.

Jeff and Cody both take Adam Scott to fail and both par. Dave Koster chooses Furyk and, despite Furyk’s appearance on page two of the leaderboard Sunday, also pars.

Donald lists the snow in the northern part of the country. Given the cold in Augusta, this wasn’t as bad as it could have been. The pros were cold too, at least. Still, Donald earns a sympathy par.

Alan says Retief won’t make the cut, and since Retief held the lead on Sunday, Alan’s got to double bogey.

Largest Surprise
I said that an amateur golfer will appear on he leaderboard midway through Sunday. None made the cut, but I only bogey, because Jerry Kelly, Zach Johnson, and Justin Rose are about as close to professional amateurs as you can get <wink>.

Donald earns a sentimental par for noting Arnold Palmer’s ceremonial role.

Dave bogeys in predicting Brett Wetterich, the 36-hole leader, would finish in the top 10. He finished T37 after a horrible weekend collapse that included a Saturday 83. Jeff bogeys for thinking Aaron Baddeley will contend. Cody bogeys in thinking the leaderboard will lack star power come Sunday, saying instead that “names like Stricker, Baddeley, Olazabal” would appear. Jack bogeys in predicting a lack of success for the South Africans – Retief could have won.

Alan doubles in thinking Richie Ramsay would finish in the top ten.

Final Leaderboard

Player          H1   H2   H3   H4   H5    Tot
------          --   --   --   --   --    ---
Barzeski         E   +1   +1   -1   +1     +2
MacKenzie        E   +1   +3    E    E     +4
Smith            E   +1    E    E   +1     +2
Koster           E   +1    E    E   +1     +2
Olson           -1   +2   +2   +2   +2     +7
Waddell          E   +1    E   -1   +1     +1
Thrasher        +1   +3   +2    E   +1     +7

So there you have it. Jack Waddell, your 2007 Masters Predictions winner.

6 thoughts on “2007 Masters in Numbers”

  1. Thank you, thank you. Really, no applause needed. I’m simply gratified that I won at +1 just like Zach.

    I will say, however, I should probably be penalized for that Largest Surprise prediction that the South Africans would not do well. Not only did Retief have a shot, but so did Sabbatini and Clark. So that guess really, really stunk. So Erik, maybe we should call that a double and you, Jeff, Dave, and I can have a playoff at the U.S. Open?

  2. So Erik, maybe we should call that a double and you, Jeff, Dave, and I can have a playoff at the U.S. Open?

    Yes, the tournament committee has decided after the fact to penalize you one additional stroke without disqualifying you. The tournament committee was so bored by this year’s event that he forgot that Rory and Little Tim were both from South Africa. 😀

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *