<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Volume One Hundred Eight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesandtrap.com/columns/hittin_the_links/volume_one_hundred_eight/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/hittin_the_links/volume_one_hundred_eight</link>
	<description>Golf News, Reviews, and Commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linus</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/hittin_the_links/volume_one_hundred_eight#comment-6710</link>
		<dc:creator>Linus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/columns/hittin_the_links/volume_one_hundred_eight#comment-6710</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I'm going to comment on that stupid article in SI.com about the cheating in golf. That article used the phrase "legalized cheating". WTF???? If it's legal, it ain't cheating. It's like complaining that "the Rules now allow players to cheat by using 3-piece urethane balls and titanium drivers." That's a dang odd definition of "cheat". I guess maybe the writer feels that those actions violate some platonic ideal.

          Look, some of the stuff he mentioned, like Monty replacing his ball in the wrong spot is, if true, either flat cheating, or just a really dumb Monty. But it isn't something that's encouraged by the rules. As for trying to hit the grandstand because you know you'll get a drop, a) you still have to execute it (hear that, Van de Velde?) and b) how is it any different from a basketball player drawing a foul or fouling an opponent hard to stop an easy lay-up or a football player drawing a pass interference? The rules explicitly allow it. But players shouldnâ€™t do it because some heavenly version of golf doesnâ€™t allow it? Sorry, the article makes no sense.
	So, I guess the answer to your question â€œdoes knowing the rules help you break them?â€, the answer is â€œno, it helps you follow the rules to your advantage.â€  If other players are too dumb or misguided to use every advantage offered by the rules, it doesnâ€™t make YOU a cheat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I'm going to comment on that stupid article in SI.com about the cheating in golf. That article used the phrase "legalized cheating". WTF???? If it's legal, it ain't cheating. It's like complaining that "the Rules now allow players to cheat by using 3-piece urethane balls and titanium drivers." That's a dang odd definition of "cheat". I guess maybe the writer feels that those actions violate some platonic ideal.</p>
<p>          Look, some of the stuff he mentioned, like Monty replacing his ball in the wrong spot is, if true, either flat cheating, or just a really dumb Monty. But it isn't something that's encouraged by the rules. As for trying to hit the grandstand because you know you'll get a drop, a) you still have to execute it (hear that, Van de Velde?) and b) how is it any different from a basketball player drawing a foul or fouling an opponent hard to stop an easy lay-up or a football player drawing a pass interference? The rules explicitly allow it. But players shouldnâ€™t do it because some heavenly version of golf doesnâ€™t allow it? Sorry, the article makes no sense.<br />
	So, I guess the answer to your question â€œdoes knowing the rules help you break them?â€, the answer is â€œno, it helps you follow the rules to your advantage.â€  If other players are too dumb or misguided to use every advantage offered by the rules, it doesnâ€™t make YOU a cheat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian D</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/hittin_the_links/volume_one_hundred_eight#comment-6681</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/columns/hittin_the_links/volume_one_hundred_eight#comment-6681</guid>
		<description>Wasn't the Evian Masters a Women's major for some time?  Good to see Natalie Gulbis come through in the final round and the playoff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn't the Evian Masters a Women's major for some time?  Good to see Natalie Gulbis come through in the final round and the playoff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
