<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angles of Error</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesandtrap.com/the_numbers_game/angles_of_error/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/the_numbers_game/angles_of_error</link>
	<description>Golf News, Reviews, and Commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: View From The Rough &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pulling out the Protractor</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/the_numbers_game/angles_of_error#comment-5859</link>
		<dc:creator>View From The Rough &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pulling out the Protractor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/columns/the_numbers_game/angles_of_error#comment-5859</guid>
		<description>[...] Sand Trap posted an excellent article on how the angle of your clubhead can affect your shot. Pulling out some geometry, the article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sand Trap posted an excellent article on how the angle of your clubhead can affect your shot. Pulling out some geometry, the article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Waddell</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/the_numbers_game/angles_of_error#comment-5852</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Waddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 19:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/columns/the_numbers_game/angles_of_error#comment-5852</guid>
		<description>Very good even if incredibly daunting info, Erik. Reminds me of a story I'm probably repeating, but it's so germane here goes:

I was doing a video at the USGA test center some years ago for Frank Thomas and his crew. The guy responsible for ball testing with Iron Byron was not a golfer, but an engineer of some repute. Over time the steel shafts in the drivers they were using would fatigue and break. When they did it took him hours to replace the club and recalibrate Iron Byron to duplicate the speed and launch conditions needed for the test.

Dealing with a perfect machine and measurable parameters, and being an engineer to boot who understood the physics and variables involved, he was quick to declare that the skill displayed by professionals were inexplicable and impossible. If a perfect machine couldn't replicate perfection, how could mere humans?

Which I guess goes to your point, Erik, that we are all better than we might imagine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good even if incredibly daunting info, Erik. Reminds me of a story I'm probably repeating, but it's so germane here goes:</p>
<p>I was doing a video at the USGA test center some years ago for Frank Thomas and his crew. The guy responsible for ball testing with Iron Byron was not a golfer, but an engineer of some repute. Over time the steel shafts in the drivers they were using would fatigue and break. When they did it took him hours to replace the club and recalibrate Iron Byron to duplicate the speed and launch conditions needed for the test.</p>
<p>Dealing with a perfect machine and measurable parameters, and being an engineer to boot who understood the physics and variables involved, he was quick to declare that the skill displayed by professionals were inexplicable and impossible. If a perfect machine couldn't replicate perfection, how could mere humans?</p>
<p>Which I guess goes to your point, Erik, that we are all better than we might imagine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NM Golf</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/the_numbers_game/angles_of_error#comment-5851</link>
		<dc:creator>NM Golf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 19:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/columns/the_numbers_game/angles_of_error#comment-5851</guid>
		<description>Very nice article, I have already shared it with several people. It's no wonder golf is such a difficult game. Although I can find no solace in the fact that flunking geometry in high school has indirectly contributed to the fact I cannot putt! :wink:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice article, I have already shared it with several people. It's no wonder golf is such a difficult game. Although I can find no solace in the fact that flunking geometry in high school has indirectly contributed to the fact I cannot putt! <img src='http://thesandtrap.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=':wink:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allin</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/the_numbers_game/angles_of_error#comment-5850</link>
		<dc:creator>Allin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/columns/the_numbers_game/angles_of_error#comment-5850</guid>
		<description>A great perspective, but I would still love to hit a 300 yard drive sometime.  Given the controversy on how far PGA players hit the ball, how do you think course designers should react to this information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great perspective, but I would still love to hit a 300 yard drive sometime.  Given the controversy on how far PGA players hit the ball, how do you think course designers should react to this information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FromTheRough</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/the_numbers_game/angles_of_error#comment-5846</link>
		<dc:creator>FromTheRough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 15:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/columns/the_numbers_game/angles_of_error#comment-5846</guid>
		<description>Very interesting numbers. We just had a conversation this weekend while watching the Players about "everything" that goes into making a great shot. If you take into consideration - the wind, club, swing, contact (angle, good, etc...), green or landing area, etc... These angles start to break some of that down. 

Tiger's lack of fairway hitting is better explained with these calc's. At 300 yds the importance of angle is so great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting numbers. We just had a conversation this weekend while watching the Players about "everything" that goes into making a great shot. If you take into consideration - the wind, club, swing, contact (angle, good, etc...), green or landing area, etc... These angles start to break some of that down. </p>
<p>Tiger's lack of fairway hitting is better explained with these calc's. At 300 yds the importance of angle is so great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
