<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disappearance of the Big Five</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesandtrap.com/thrash_talk/disappearance_of_the_big_five/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/disappearance_of_the_big_five</link>
	<description>Golf News, Reviews, and Commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Watson &#124; The Sand Trap</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/disappearance_of_the_big_five#comment-2342</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Watson &#124; The Sand Trap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 18:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/uncategorized/disappearance_of_the_big_five/#comment-2342</guid>
		<description>One of the PGA Tour's all time greatest players, Tom Watson compiled an amazing record in only a few short years. He won his eight majors in eight years and added some of golf's greatest moments.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the PGA Tour's all time greatest players, Tom Watson compiled an amazing record in only a few short years. He won his eight majors in eight years and added some of golf's greatest moments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bay Hill Invitational Preview &#124; The Sand Trap</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/disappearance_of_the_big_five#comment-2341</link>
		<dc:creator>Bay Hill Invitational Preview &#124; The Sand Trap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/uncategorized/disappearance_of_the_big_five/#comment-2341</guid>
		<description>The 2007 event will be called the Arnold Palmer Invitational but could easily be called the Tiger Woods Invitational as he goes for his fifth win here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2007 event will be called the Arnold Palmer Invitational but could easily be called the Tiger Woods Invitational as he goes for his fifth win here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/disappearance_of_the_big_five#comment-2340</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/uncategorized/disappearance_of_the_big_five/#comment-2340</guid>
		<description>The "Big Five" was what everyone was talking about when Tiger was in his slump. Now that he's returned to his former self by crushing the competition it has become apparent again that its Tiger against everyone else.

I don't think any of the so-called "Big Five" are going to assert themselves at this point. Vijay's 2004 was out of this world and repeating that now is a good thought but a little unrealistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The "Big Five" was what everyone was talking about when Tiger was in his slump. Now that he's returned to his former self by crushing the competition it has become apparent again that its Tiger against everyone else.</p>
<p>I don't think any of the so-called "Big Five" are going to assert themselves at this point. Vijay's 2004 was out of this world and repeating that now is a good thought but a little unrealistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: golfanatic</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/disappearance_of_the_big_five#comment-2339</link>
		<dc:creator>golfanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/uncategorized/disappearance_of_the_big_five/#comment-2339</guid>
		<description>I agree totally with your article, and also with your feelings about Ogilvy and especially Luke Donald.  I think golf performance is directly proportional to putting prowess more than any other aspect of the game, and I do NOT mean putts per round.  I personally maintain my putting stats based on every time I use the putter, even from just off the green.  I don't believe it's correct to "reward" poor GIR stats by inflating (lowering) putts per round stats.  Keep an eye on the putting prowess of all the top pros.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree totally with your article, and also with your feelings about Ogilvy and especially Luke Donald.  I think golf performance is directly proportional to putting prowess more than any other aspect of the game, and I do NOT mean putts per round.  I personally maintain my putting stats based on every time I use the putter, even from just off the green.  I don't believe it's correct to "reward" poor GIR stats by inflating (lowering) putts per round stats.  Keep an eye on the putting prowess of all the top pros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Day</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/disappearance_of_the_big_five#comment-2338</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/uncategorized/disappearance_of_the_big_five/#comment-2338</guid>
		<description>I can't speak for the others, but do you suppose Phil is a bit bored. He has his two majors and can't seem to beat Tigre in a head on confrontation. Where does he go from here? Second, third are not interesting enough to keep him interested. Maybe some of the younger golfers will rise to the challange. I am with you, although I understand that Tiger may be the best it is boring when all else play for second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't speak for the others, but do you suppose Phil is a bit bored. He has his two majors and can't seem to beat Tigre in a head on confrontation. Where does he go from here? Second, third are not interesting enough to keep him interested. Maybe some of the younger golfers will rise to the challange. I am with you, although I understand that Tiger may be the best it is boring when all else play for second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Day</title>
		<link>http://thesandtrap.com/columns/thrash_talk/disappearance_of_the_big_five#comment-2337</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesandtrap.com/uncategorized/disappearance_of_the_big_five/#comment-2337</guid>
		<description>I can't speak for the others, but do you suppose Phil is a bit bored. He has his two majors and can't seem to beat Tigre in a head on confrontation. Where does he go from here? Second, third are not interesting enough to keep him interested. Maybe some of the younger golfers will rise to the challange. I am with you, although I understand that Tiger may be the best it is boring whenall else play for second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't speak for the others, but do you suppose Phil is a bit bored. He has his two majors and can't seem to beat Tigre in a head on confrontation. Where does he go from here? Second, third are not interesting enough to keep him interested. Maybe some of the younger golfers will rise to the challange. I am with you, although I understand that Tiger may be the best it is boring whenall else play for second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
