iacas
January 3rd, 2005, 06:25 pm
There are two stances on this:
Grooves help to impart spin
Grooves channel away water, mud, grass, etc.
The 98% figure I quoted on the blog (http://thesandtrap.com/archives/tip_of_the_day/the_purpose_of_grooves.golf) is from memory, but is accurate so far as I know. However, there's a lot of misinformation out there, including information from TaylorMade (http://www.taylormadegolf.com/global/technology/t_grooves.asp) and Pat Ryan (http://www.patryangolf.com/history.htm).
Here's more evidence (http://www.patryangolf.com/smoothfacedriver.htm) to support the theory that grooves act as channels for debris and even goes a bit burther:
This means that the face roughness, or coefficient of friction, does not contribute to the backspin produced during stage 1 but contributes significantly to the forces acting against backspin in stage 2.* So, a rough surface, such as rough steel, retards the overall spin of the ball more than a lower friction material such as Teflon.* Therefore the smoother surface generates greater backspin.
The Ping irons of a decade or so ago weren't so great at imparting spin because they could "grab" the ball more, but because they were more efficient channelers of mud, grass, and water.
What do you think (and what sources on the Web can you find) to back up your theory?
Either way, I know to keep my grooves clean.
Grooves help to impart spin
Grooves channel away water, mud, grass, etc.
The 98% figure I quoted on the blog (http://thesandtrap.com/archives/tip_of_the_day/the_purpose_of_grooves.golf) is from memory, but is accurate so far as I know. However, there's a lot of misinformation out there, including information from TaylorMade (http://www.taylormadegolf.com/global/technology/t_grooves.asp) and Pat Ryan (http://www.patryangolf.com/history.htm).
Here's more evidence (http://www.patryangolf.com/smoothfacedriver.htm) to support the theory that grooves act as channels for debris and even goes a bit burther:
This means that the face roughness, or coefficient of friction, does not contribute to the backspin produced during stage 1 but contributes significantly to the forces acting against backspin in stage 2.* So, a rough surface, such as rough steel, retards the overall spin of the ball more than a lower friction material such as Teflon.* Therefore the smoother surface generates greater backspin.
The Ping irons of a decade or so ago weren't so great at imparting spin because they could "grab" the ball more, but because they were more efficient channelers of mud, grass, and water.
What do you think (and what sources on the Web can you find) to back up your theory?
Either way, I know to keep my grooves clean.