Posts by flanagan

Maybe they're just a degree out of whack from playing and need to be flatter just to get back to where they were. Anyway, you know what's best for your game.

Originally Posted by iacas http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/colum...bob&id=4470699 Guess I (and millions of others, I assume) was right in how I read Snedeker's reactions on the green. Good get.

Originally Posted by LongballGer The image you get of tour pros on tv is kinda messed up. There are always pros in the tournaments that hit shanks, chunks, blade shots etc... Of course they don't show that on tv so...

This doesn't make sense. You don't necessarily "beat the game" by shooting under par. Course conditions change, your personal health and mental state change, "beating the game" (assuming that makes sense) might be...

The Golf Channel should have some more original, instructional programming. I like Breed and I believe he enjoys what he is doing and is good at it, but the format is too frantic and his use of toys a little too contrived at times. ...

Originally Posted by colin007 does anyone else get the impression that when a pro hits a shank like johnson did today, the network almost seems to cover it up? they dont show replays of it like they do of good shots. ...

He had to know he was on the bubble, I can't imagine, as quickly as the landscape was changing and how close everything was that he knew exactly where he stood, which is why the casual third putt shocked me. After the Masters, then...

Send him a Fed Ex this week, that should clinch it!

It depends on where your head is when you start. I don't have my head completely behind the ball with my wedges, but I don't move it forward when I swing with them. As for the range thing, if it's all going wrong, what I do is work...

Nicklaus played like that, but in most of the reading I've done, I haven't found it to be the most common theory in terms of ball position. Like many others I subscribe to the ball moving progressively back for shorter clubs, but I...