The more I think about it, only a magazine/company that is in decline would find the need to do something like this Just a guess (I could be wrong). That's all fine and dandy. Still doesn't explain why they couldn't have placed at least 1 LPGA golfer on their cover in the last 6+ years (that's what, +/- 72 covers or so and not at least 1 LPGA player). There is no excuse.
4/8/14 at 1:12pm