or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by luu5

Thx, just read about it on another forum.
 But this may move you back to cart path. So better check carefully before picking up the ball.
 But there has to be a "reasonable possiblity" of assisting or interfering. So the rule can not be abused and each case is unique. From decision 22/3: 
 Perhaps it speaks more about your club?
 True, what I mean is that there is no need to make things more complicated when in this type of situation. Just take unplayable and that's it. All done by the book.
 This is true and it looks like OP did that, except we do not know if he added the penalty. No need for special rules.
 Perhaps knowing the real reason would ensure the law suit ending up (quite) right? http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/26/us-malaysianairlines-boeing-lawsuit-idUSBREA2P0PP20140326
 I did not suggest that he prys the ball out trying to find water. His ball was 4 inches below surface, so unplayable is most likely. If he then sees water in the hole, I would say it is casual water. I can see Ignorant's point in not giving free relief. But to say that water is not casual water would be odd, what water that then is?
 If you hit a ball four inches below surface, most likely you would take unplayable, i.e. you lift the ball, find water in the hole, casual water. Or do you mean casual water has to always be visible without any action (except taking a stance)?
 In decision 25/3 the player is also creating the condition but is allowed the relief. What about deeming ball unplayable, digging the ball up and then finding out the casual water, a'la decision 28/13?   Maybe @fourputt is on his way back to/from the mountain?
New Posts  All Forums: