Posts by sacm3bill

Quote: Originally Posted by Golfingdad  Quote: Originally Posted by MS256  Hmmm...4% grade. 12 on the Stimp. Hit the putt with the same force as a 12 foot level...

Quote: Originally Posted by Rulesman  Quote: Originally Posted by sacm3bill    Not sure exactly what stance you're taking, but Woods' case was different because irrefutable...

Quote: Originally Posted by iacas  Quote: Originally Posted by sacm3bill  Not sure exactly what stance you're taking, but Woods' case was different because irrefutable evidence came to...

Quote: Originally Posted by chico713  49 yrs old. Same handicap. Same scores. Lessons. New equipment. Play 3 times per week. Still shoot 85 almost every time. Am I alone here??   On the bright side, at least...

Quote: Originally Posted by Rulesman  Ridley said that they got dozens of 'call ins'.   No doubt all of them resulted in the committee deciding no action was needed. So they never spoke to the player....

Quote: Originally Posted by Dormie1360  IMO with your last hypo, the official not seeing the infraction ( or actually seeing it for that matter), and not saying anything is different than the...

Quote: Originally Posted by Mordan  There are only two cases of a DQ being waived like this that I'm aware of. In both cases the committee or official made an error based on the facts in front of them. Whether or not...

Quote: Originally Posted by turtleback    Yes there is an element of randomness.  Just as there is an element of randomness in a lot of aspects of golf.  So what?  It is golf.  If it...

Quote: Originally Posted by Mordan  In the Janzen case the rules official clearly witnessed Janzen wiping the grass (altering his stance or lie) but failed to recognise that it was a rules violation. As the official...

Quote: Originally Posted by bplewis24  For what it's worth, I disagree that the hypothetical situation would result in a DQ.   But why is that? Because an attempt was made to contact the player even though...