• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jmurdock

Ping S58 irons

19 posts in this topic

Anyone playing these? Opinions?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

My swing coach has a PING contract and gets clubs for free (basically a staffer), and he lets me try his irons sometimes at lessons, and generally I try his S59's and S58's. Now my coach, he got his S58's last year and played them once and went back to the S59's.

After hitting both, sometimes side by side, heres my comparison:
  • S59 are smaller than S58
  • S59 feel lighter than S58 (stock weight)
  • S59 have a bit lower launch than S58

Personally I like the S59's a lot more than the S58, and like I said earlier, so does my coach. Now granted they are both great irons, and I might buy the S58's from my coach, but again I just think the S59's are a much better set, and the are cheaper

Also, if you are willing to wait PING is coming out with new irons (S57), but I am not sure when they will be released, but I could find out if you would like me to. This would also make the S59' cheaper, as well as the S58's.

Hope this helps, and good luck finding some irons.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be great if you could find out. Thanks

...I think the S57 is only being released in Japan...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No they are going to be released here in America, my pro mentioned them to me at one of my lessons. He was like, "Today I found out that PING is going to come out with new irons, the S57's"
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I weren't on staff with Callaway, I would definitely be playing the S58 or S59s. I LOVE those clubs!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ping have released the S57's - true - but only in Japan at the moment. There have been pictures all over the net for the last few months.

The S58's are the nicest club i've ever hit. What 907golfer says is true about the S59's over the S58's (cheaper, smaller, heavier, lower ball flight, more workable) but I wanted a club that was a little bigger, a little more forgiving but still a players iron. Granted, they cost more but I feel the premium price is justified. The finish is beautiful - not that shiny chrome look that I dislike.

The top line is pretty thin as far as Pings come - it's similar looking than the Titleist 755 and a little thinner than the AP2's. I was a previous Titleist iron-player (DCI 962's for 8 years) but I would go for the S58's over any Titleists today. The S57's look sweet - well the orange bit at the back looks gimmicky (like the 755's - and i've seen a couple of them falling off) - they have that same tungsten weight as the Tour-W wedges too.

My pro is a Ping staff man, he plays the S59's mostly but has put the S58's back in the bag for some forgiveness. I didn't think many people would have this iron becaues it's a Ping - but at the top level: Angel Cabrera won the US Open with them, Lorena Ochoa wins every week with them, Gregory Havret won the Scottish Open with them and at the Walker Cup last year I counted 6 sets among the 20 players - making it the most played iron there.

One thing I would say if you are getting them is - get yourself fitted. You can do it online (I did - and then my pro measured me, same fitting: +1/2, blue dot) though I think the shafts aren't stiff enough for me. I'll look into getting new shafts this summer but the S58 heads are staying for a long time!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i went with the s59, but i've hit the 58's very nice sticks

-matt
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I talked to someone at Ping and they said that they are not planning any new releases (S57) this year in the States.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone else out there playing the S58's???
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are on my radar. What I have hit of them I like. Maybe a tad too light of a club for my liking. But I would get a different shaft to combat that. I think they default a D0 or D1 swingweight, I THINK am not 100% sure. Everyone I know who has them loves them.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are the S59 forgiving at all?

Yes they are - they're not uber difficult to hit, but in relative terms they require a little more consistency to produce good shots than S58's. I had a choice between the 2 and the little bit of forgiveness swayed it for me.

The S57's look a little more blade-y than either - with less offset and tinner top line. I'll give them a look if they get released in the Western world.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it make sense that these were a gold medal winner on Golf Digest's hot list in 2007, but a silver medal winner in 2008?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried them for the first time a couple days ago, ABO****LY loved them, not matter how bad I hit it it felt amazing!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Were you fitted or did you just hit the standard black dots?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Were you fitted or did you just hit the standard black dots?

Standard black dots, Didn't even hit them well and it was going good.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it make sense that these were a gold medal winner on Golf Digest's hot list in 2007, but a silver medal winner in 2008?

I guess it makes sense - in that the judges decided that there were better clubs in 2008 in comparison. I saw that too - They were gold when I got them and now they're silver!

Well it doesn't really matter what GD says - they are a great club, Lorena Ochoa and Angel Cabrera will tell you as much. Pre GD 2008 and post.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      I know your pain, somewhat. I, unlike you, can usually pin it on a club. My 4 iron can get me into trouble. For whatever reason, I tend to ground it more than any other club, to the point I deliberately stand a bit more upright to counter it. Something about that 4, it just makes me want to drop my lower body a little more or something. So, just to use my example, I changed my stance to counter a bad habit because it got to the point that I made that move consistently, and the countering stance change has mostly fixed my problem. Now, my problem is the sub-50 game, especially in the range of 1-10 yards from the green. My short-range chipping just needs work. I've started treating it more like a wedge putt, but that light push doesn't fit well with an uneven surface (clipping a small hill that kills the speed and gets the ball nowhere). It'll mostly come down to recognizing what kinds of things you screw up. Like people said, those "hero shots" can be a killer because they usually require perfection, and when you don't get it, you're in a position that can add 2 more to the score to get out of those woods or that sand trap. Damage control's a big thing to recognize and strive for. Anyone here can only help you so much, especially with a general "how do I do better?" question like this. If your screw-ups aren't a consistent problem, a solution is hard to find beyond "play more, get better." You kind of have to eat the occasional bad hole because you're not striving for perfection and putting in the hours many have over the years. It's not to suggest an inability to improve, just to say that if you can't identify where you're making mistakes most, there's no way anyone here can.
    • 2016 TST Initiative: Forward Tees Tournament
      In Lowest Score Wins, we recommend that golfers play from the forward tees in order to experience "breaking 80" for the first time, or shooting 65, or having more birdie putts than they've ever had, or whatever. This year, in 2016, we're taking it one step farther: we're encouraging everyone here to work with the head pro at your home course (or, if you play multiple courses, the head pro at each of them!) and to set up a serious "Forward Tees Tournament." A Forward Tees Tournament (FTT) will be: FUN! Enlightening Unique Challenging I'll give anyone who creates and/or participates in a FTT this year the special achievement/award seen to the left. Anyone with this award will be entered to win a TST prize to be determined at the end of the year (and I'll do my best to make it a fairly good prize, but that shouldn't be the main reason why anyone should do this). You can play: With or without handicaps. With or without brackets/divisions/flights. Stroke play or match play. 18, 27, 36, 54+ holes. One day, two days, three days. Etc. I think golfers will love playing in this type of tournament. I think it will challenge them to think about how they play and score. I think it will result in faster play, more fun, more birdies, more chances to hit 7-iron into par fives and feel like a Tour player for once, and… lower scores (or higher scores for the dumb players!). So there you have it. What can you do from here? Pledge here in this thread to talk to your head pro. Recruit your buddies and local golfers to play in your event. Work with your head pro to make the event a success. Play in the event! Post here after your tournament has been played to claim your super-exclusive award/achievement! I'm in. I'll be doing this, hopefully at multiple courses this year. Are you?
    • Posting old scores
      I haven't had an official handicap for about 15 years because in the past several I've only been able to play 6-8 times per year. This year I joined a club so that I could play in tournaments and since I need five scores to get a handicap, I entered some scores in GHIN from my last few rounds in 2015 (since I play so rarely, I can remember them). When I was doing this, I forgot to change the date when posting a score from August so it defaulted to today and is now my most recent reported score. GHIN won't let me change the entry but says to "contact my club" to fix it, which seems like a hassle for everyone involved. It's not my lowest score but it's close, so it will probably be included in my handicap calculation for quite a while unless the date is changed. How big of a deal is this?
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Another thing is sometimes to 'give up' on par. For example, as a bogey golfer, if I hit a bad tee shot and end up say 220yds from the hold on a par 4 rather than the usual 130yds, play the hole as if bogey is the new par. You've made the hole more difficult for yourself and rather than trying to hit the green with a 3 wood (a green designed to be hit with a mid/short iron), take 2 shots to get on the green and 2 shots to get down. 1 220yd par 4 is an easy hole (could even make birdie (which becomes par and a great save) whereas a 220 yd par 3, not off the tee, is asking for trouble. Not always the best way to play golf (read Lowest Score Wins) but the best way to avoid blowing up.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Find it yourself please. I don't think that would provide much insight. Courses, technology… all very different. Too many differences. People who qualify for the Opens rarely actually compete for them. The winners and top finishers almost always come from those who qualify automatically. I'm not. Very few foreign golfers played on the PGA Tour in the 60s. It's been steadily growing - and travel has made it easier, too - through to now. And even now we're starting to see Asian golfers really take over. The only Asian golfer many could name who competed against Nicklaus was Isao Aoki. Maybe Jumbo Ozaki. I'm just talking about the number of golfers. There are a ton more now. I don't care. I realize perhaps your condition forces you to take everything literally, but I wasn't being literal here. The PGA Tour takes the best 150 players or so out of X. As X grows, the amount of separation between those top 150 players narrows. We're in a very narrow phase right now. When Jack was playing, the gap was significantly wider. No. Tiger was quite a bit more dominant and "above" even MORE highly competitive fields. Both halves of that are true: Tiger won by larger margins and against stronger fields. I agree. And I've said similar things. No…? You don't say? (On page 273 of a thread doing just that…)? You seem to be the only person who regards WGCs as weaker fields that offer a "competitive break." It says a lot about how others should consider your opinions on strength of field. You're assuming or haven't read many of my posts in this thread, because I've said several times that I'd put it within a few points of 50/50. Maybe 55/45. Hardly what I'd call "strong." Of course we're both "estimating." Tiger's record, IMO, against significantly stiffer competition, puts him ahead. Not by a lot. Not really. If only 30 players had a realistic chance to win a tournament, adding players beyond that 30th player does little to affect the strength of the field. The WGCs could add 200 club professionals that would never win and… the strength of field would remain exactly the same. Where have I said this? Because even if I did, it doesn't support whatever you're trying to force it into supporting here. The odds of a club pro beating anyone on the PGA Tour these days are slim to none. They were slightly more likely back when fewer "A" players played the PGA Tour… like in the 60s and 70s. A "C" player's game almost never varies enough - not for four days - to beat even 10 or 15 "A" players. Here's an opinion, but one I could probably back up if I cared enough to take the time (I do not): a modern WGC has a stronger field than many (perhaps all) of the majors Nicklaus won. I've said this before, and will say it again here: In Jack's day, there were maybe 10-15 "A" players, 25 "B" players, and the rest were "C" players. Today there are 100+ A players and the rest B players. I'm also going to request, mostly because of the number of times I've had to repeat myself in this thread, that you not quote or respond to me, @natureboy, in this thread. I'm not keen on repeating myself about something that, ultimately, I don't care that much about. It is what it is, their records are what they are, and they could only beat the guys they played against.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries