• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Sherlockian

Drive short shaft experiment has merit.

14 posts in this topic

Last night, I was reading a current article on Anthony Kim and his gripping down clubs. He is 5'10" and essentially plays his driver at 42'. I am 6' and still play steel shaft small cc drivers(Steelhead) most of the time, but the article provoked me to try and experiment. I have 2 GBBII 415cc drivers with Aldila NV shafts, one regular and one stiff. I ended up cutting the stiff shaft down to 43.5". I stopped by the driving range on the way home today and all I can say is, wow. I had the consistency/accuracy of my 3wood and a little more distance than my normal driver. I am not a long hitter by any stretch of the imagination. Without carry added in, I usually hit my drives around 240. The short shaft driver added around 10 yards, and 7 out of 10 were landing in the same area. The other few were only slightly left(my normal flight is a draw). Most with roll ended up around the 275 marker, I have never hit balls that far repeatedly. I am looking forward to giving the shorty a go on the course Friday. The fall winds have been killing my tee shots with the 3 and 5 woods, to the point I have been hitting alot of low 2 irons.

Has anyone else had the same experience?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

i havent had the same experience and i havent tried that yet, but i did read the article. i would think it would benefit the longer hitters too, cuz obviously anthony does it. i might check this out soon
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last night, I was reading a current article on Anthony Kim and his gripping down clubs. He is 5'10" and essentially plays his driver at 42'. I am 6' and still play steel shaft small cc drivers(Steelhead) most of the time, but the article provoked me to try and experiment. I have 2 GBBII 415cc drivers with Aldila NV shafts, one regular and one stiff. I ended up cutting the stiff shaft down to 43.5". I stopped by the driving range on the way home today and all I can say is, wow. I had the consistency/accuracy of my 3wood and a little more distance than my normal driver. I am not a long hitter by any stretch of the imagination. Without carry added in, I usually hit my drives around 240. The short shaft driver added around 10 yards, and 7 out of 10 were landing in the same area. The other few were only slightly left(my normal flight is a draw). Most with roll ended up around the 275 marker, I have never hit balls that far repeatedly. I am looking forward to giving the shorty a go on the course Friday. The fall winds have been killing my tee shots with the 3 and 5 woods, to the point I have been hitting alot of low 2 irons.

Wow, a 17 handicap that can hit a 2 iron stinger you have gained my respect

. I cant even hit my 3 iron . But on the topic of cutting down your driver, I think it has some merrit but I think it would be better if you just put a 3 wood shaft in a driver head, so it wouldnt screw around with the flex that much.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah for some reason, I have always been able to hit the long irons well. I may not get the distance a lot of guys do, but I hit them solid. When I was in high school, I caught alot of flack because my only wood was a 3. The 1 and 2 irons were my tee box clubs back then. My handicap is primarily a result of poor decision making. I just started back playing the game after many years of a "relaxed" lifestyle. I have a problem trying to hit shots that I could in the 90's when I carried a 7 index. At some point I will realize I am almost 20 years older, and my much heavier, less flexible body can't play like it used to.

About changing the shaft characteristics/flex, I cannot tell any difference in feel or impact, only control. I don't feel that the NV85 is affected as drastically as some shafts would be. Also this was an knee jerk/right now type of experiment on a driver that I rarely pulled out of the closet.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't cutting down the shaft dramatically change the swing weight? If you cut it down from 45" to 43.5" then didn't you go from something like D2 to C6?

I tried that with a Callaway Hyper X driver and didn't like how it felt at all. One of the clubmakers I know said I needed to add lead tape back to the clubhead to re-balance the club, but it was kind of a pain. I'm thinking of just having a shorter driver made to fit me and see how I like it.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I was planning to do this last Sunday, and I started par-par. Then I hit a hook on the par-3 third and my mental state evaporated, so I forgot to do this for a few holes. I remembered off-and-on the rest of the day to do this, and the few good shots I remember were the result of this.

Of course, my friends won't believe I'm doing it to get better. They'll believe I'm doing it because AK does it. But if I get better, I don't care what they think my motivation was.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am not a "tech" golfer, I don't get all the little nuances associated with clubs such lie angle, swingweight, dispertion, torque, mid-kick flex, MOI, etc. I worry about my swing and striking the ball. I let the golf shop and clubmaker worry about the technical side of the clubs. I am sure the swingweight changed, but I can't tell. The point was that I am hitting the club better, longer, and more accurate than I ever have. If the short driver continues to help/please my game, I will be visiting the the shop to get one fitted correctly.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After playing the shortened driver today, I am sticking with the short shaft. I played one round today and for the first time ,since I picked the game back up, I played my driver on all the 4 and 5s. There were a few bad shots, but overall I was hitting the driver 10 times better than before. I now have confidence with a large volume driver (415cc vs 205cc). After the round, I went to my local shop with the driver to get a better fit on the shaft. After a little hitting on the "golf tron", we decided on a 43.5" TT Dynalite stiff STEEL. With this shaft and length, I am renaming the club: Great Big Bertha TIHEAD II.

I also picked up a cool American Bison(Buffalo to some) headcover for it.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will have to try this. I am also over 6 foot tall. Right now, my goal is accurate driving.
Did you just choke up or did you actually have the shaft shortened?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i've tried choking up on my driver with varying results...i think the characteristics of the shaft have a lot to do with the success of this. but i have found tremendous success with my longer irons chocking up. i've long known that my 8 iron is my favorite club...when i set up it feels just perfect and natural and i can carry 155-160 with a slight draw pattern. i started experimenting choking on clubs longer than my 8i trying to emulate the same length so that i can make roughly the same stroke and what do you know i'm hitting every iron in my bag cleanly and perfectly at a very high percentage. what i've noticed most is the shorter length give me more confidence to hit down on the ball and really apply pressure on the ball.

i'm planning on building a snake eyes driver, i might build it with a shorter shaft so i can finally get that control with the driver i've been looking for.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I was reading the same article in "Golf Magazine". The choking up doesn't work for me really.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really, I think it works great as well and I feel like I gain alot of distance and control doing so as I am making better contact more often.

Now if I could only put................
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I was planning to do this last Sunday, and I started par-par. Then I hit a hook on the par-3 third and my mental state evaporated, so I forgot to do this for a few holes. I remembered off-and-on the rest of the day to do this, and the few good shots I remember were the result of this.

I wrote this a few weeks ago and barely touched a golf club since, until this morning. I went to the range and hit a small bucket, gripping down on my irons. I also used the wedges and my "new" 5-Wood, although I didn't end up taking out the 3-Wood or the driver. In any case, I really like the way this worked. I hit a few really thin - literally hit just the top half of the ball. But for those, I feel I was way too far from the ball at setup.

In any case, I really liked the way this felt. I'm going to experiment with this a bit more.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I grip down when the hole calls for a draw as it makes it easier to draw the ball. I don't notice much difference in distance choked down.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • My Swing (coop6)
      It pretty much is, I'm not going to debate 5 degrees with you. As I've said repeatedly, Tiger's swing and a standard swing do not require rotation. On this shot he rotated 5 degrees, not much. If you want to play with rotation to closed enjoy. I prefer to keep the club square. 
    • Struggles of turning pro
      http://thesandtrap.com/blogs/ Normally you must be an Established Member to create a blog, but I've enabled this for you now.
    • No Forearm Rotation - Biggest Swing Flaw?
      Completely bogus. The arms (forearms) rotate in every good golf swing. Here's an old thread that's appropriate for this discussion.   Also, I don't think I've ever really seen a golfer, throughout his backswing, rotate his forearms the opposite way. For short periods of time, maybe a few golfers "counter-rotate," but all end up rotating some. No, there won't be "arguments" over this, or there shouldn't be, because… like many things, this is pretty much a fact. There really doesn't need to be an argument or a discussion. It's a knowable, understandable thing. Hunter, like every other PGA Tour pro, rotates his forearms during the backswing. You're rotating your arms as you do this. It's subtle, but if you just pick the club up straight without rotating, you'll have the shaft resting against the top of your head. Look at where the back of your left hand points. Toward the target at setup, and then rotated to put the club on your right shoulder. Turn to the top when the club is on your face or the top of your head and the club will be leaning out over the target line (it'll be roughly parallel to your bend toward the ball, since it's basically just staying inline with your spine). Bending your right arm rotates your forearms. It pulls everything to the right (you can't bend your right arm straight in front of you without also bending your left arm). Then even more rotation is added after that. I agree that you don't want to be doing a lot of "things" on the downswing, but that's not how physics works. You can do all sorts of things on the backswing and not do them on the downswing. We have students who swing steep to steep, steep to shallow, shallow to steep, shallow to shallow, and all sorts of things. We have students who address the ball with a closed clubface, roll it way open, and then return it wide open, etc. The "equal and opposite" does not mean a delayed reaction - it means that if I push on something it will, right at that very moment, push back. If I fire rocket propulsion downward, the missile or space shuttle or whatever will move upward. You don't fire rockets and then, a week later, a different missile takes off as a "reaction." Furthermore, PGA Tour players have a variety of backswings. Ray Floyd was underneath, Rickie Fowler or Ryan Moore are steep or over the top on the backswing. The golfer who comes closest to the "square" or "no rotation" backswing is a guy who CAN'T really rotate his forearms: Tim Clark. And even Tim rotates some. But notice how far "out over his head" the clubhead is, despite the fact that he's well short of parallel on the backswing. It's so much more than that. I ask people in my lessons how much skill or raw natural talent it takes to set up properly. The correct answer: none. They just have to know how to do it. If golf was as simple as "set up properly and then turn" we'd all be a whole lot better than we are. Golfers can be set up the same and make very, very different backswings, and both can be successful. So Bubba is doing it wrong? And what does that have to do with the swing flaw of "rotating your forearms"? (Is overswinging a big problem? Absolutely. More, IMO, for what it tends to do to the trail elbow and the subsequent inability of the player to get the arms and hands down fast enough. I'll never really argue against overswinging, except when it's made as a blanket statement covering all golfers who go past parallel or something.) Also, you said (though it feels off topic since this is mostly about forearm rotation, n'est-ce pas?) "the more you have to wait for them to come down." That's not really true - you can MAKE them come down faster. Your arms aren't just limp things hanging from your shoulders that get dragged behind your hips and torso rotating. Because, biomechanically, making a swing with no forearm rotation would be ridiculous and resemble the golf swings of precisely no good players, ever. Tim Clark comes closest, and people don't even copy his swing, and if Tim Clark's forearms would rotate as most people's do, even Tim Clark would have a different golf swing. Modeling your golf swing on someone with a disability hardly seems like the prudent choice. My last piece of evidence, right here: This should drive the point home pretty significantly. Spoiler One last thing here. Consider the sagittal plane (in the spoiler above, just so it's not taking up a ton of space) and the back of the left hand (assuming a right-handed golfer). At address, they're parallel - the back of the left hand is parallel to the sagittal plane. Yet at the top of the backswing, what do we see? The sagittal plane (at the point of attachment of the arms, i.e. near the shoulders) is about 90° from where it started. It's inclined at about 35° or so, but otherwise just is still just a plane bisecting the sternum, neck, face, etc. What plane is the back of the left wrist on? Why, it's one that's about 90° to the sagittal plane. I've illustrated this here: In this illustration, I've drawn a little "cube" in the screen on the left. The green face of the cube is parallel to the sagittal plane (the edge of the plane is pointing "at the camera"). The blue side - perpendicular to the green side - is parallel to the back of the left hand. It too is pointing at the camera, but has rotated about 90°. That's why it's parallel to a perpendicular side of the cube. On the right, above, to make the back of Mike's left hand parallel the green face of the cube, he'd have to rotate his arms BACK about 90° to the red line. Now, then, @Golfer2223, you'd set a record as the first human being in history to present an argument as you have done and immediately recognize, given my response and a little thought on your part, that you want to take back your entire argument and completely change your position. In other words, I don't expect that to happen. A small part of me hopes it will some day, but I don't think today is going to be that day. But, realistically, that's what should happen. As I see it, you have no real ground to stand on here. Not biomechanically, not based on simple geometry, nothing. The arms rotate during the backswing in EVERY good player. Even in Tim Clark's backswing (or he'd truly have the club hanging out over his head. I will also say this, @Golfer2223: I appreciate your willingness to help, and to jump in, and to offer your thoughts on things. I hope you can take this rebuttal in the spirit in which it's intended - to help and to discuss. I don't know who you are (you should add more info to your profile), and I'm not responding just to be mean, but to help people learn, think critically, and better understand the golf swing. We encourage debate and discussion here, and that's all my response is to be taken as - more debate and discussion. Do I think I'm right? Yes. And I think I've backed up why. P.S. As someone noted above, often students need to feel like there's no rotation in the backswing. But that doesn't make it accurate.
    • Northern Michigan Courses
      I have been to Northern Michigan on several occasions. There are a lot of great golf courses but they are SPREAD OUT so keep driving distance in mind.   Arcadia Bluffs Forest Dunes True North Little Traverse Bay Belvedere Dunmaglas Black Lake Grand Traverse Resort (Nicklaus and Player Course) Lochenheath  Leelanau Boyne Hills Course   These are all EXCELLENT golf courses that are worth playing
    • Crandon/Key Biscayne or Biltmore
      Wow, tough choice! Key Biscayne or Crandon. Either one would be awesome.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries