Jump to content
IGNORED

rangefinders.


Note: This thread is 5609 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

hi guys i am really sorry to post
yet another thread on rangefinders/gps, but as i am reletivly new to golf
i would like to now, wat ones are the best basic ones, i dont need ones that choose clubs and all that, what the difference is between gps and rangefinder, how u use them, the pros, the cons, and really any think else you guys have to say on the subject, thanks in advance.
sam
Link to comment
Share on other sites


As you have either noticed or correctly guessed, there are numerous posts on this very subject. You can find those easily by going to SEARCH option at top and entering search work of "rangefinders".

This is a subject of great debate for many reasons. The first being 'which techology is better - rangefinder (laser) or GPS? After that such questions as which of these is easier and faster to use and which is more accurate.

Once you're decided which technology best fits what you want and fits your needs best, then you can look at specific brands and models in each. At that point it comes down to price, features, ease of use, accuracy, adaptability, etc. to decide which specific model is for you.

My advice is to look over the other posts, then if possible do actually look at some of these in a retail golf store if possible and see for yourself which you like best. There are numerous reviews online for just about every model available for both rangefinders and GPS units. I personally carry a GPS unit that I am fairly happy with (iGolf Neo), but it does the minimum (and thus has low cost). Some GPS units will do just about everything short of hitting shot for you (I'm sure they're working on that, too).

The biggest complaint with GPS units is usually related to accuracy, how the course was mapped and the fact that the mapped points are static. Biggest plus is simplicity and line of site not required. Rangefinders major complaints consist of some being hard to lock on target and they can be slower to use (experience helps improve this). Most common advantages are adaptability/dynamic targeting and accuracy (they tend to be potentially more accurate by a few yards). Most of these points are discussed in depth between the other posts.

Good luck.
Driver: SQ DYMO STR8-Fit
4 Wood: SQ DYMO
2H (17*), 4H (23*) & 5H (26*): Fli-Hi CLK
Irons (5-6): MX-900; (7-PW): MP-60
Wedges (51/6*): MP-T Chrome; (56/13): MP-R ChromePutter: White Hot XG 2-Ball CSPreferred Ball: e5+/e7+/B330-RXGPS Unit: NEOPush Cart: 2.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites


There was also an article on this in I believe Golf Digest this month (that or Golf...I get both and don't remember). They compared GPS devices for their "best" but I also seem to remember them talking about the differences on GPS vs range finders. Might be able to find that article on golfdigest.com

Myself...I chose GPS for ease of use. No steady hand required, no worries about getting a false reading from a tree or not being able to get one because of no direct line of sight, etc. And I'm a 10 handicap....the 2-3 yards more accurate the range finder might be isn't going to matter to my skill level. True, I do have to pay a yearly subscription fee but that's about the same as buying a box of balls.

All comes down to personal preference.

WHAT'S IN MY BAG

Driver: TaylorMade RBZ 9.5 degree; 3-Wood: TaylorMade RBZ 15 degree; Hybrids: TaylorMade RBZ 19 degree; Irons: Titleist AP1; Wedges: Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 54/60; Putter: Scotty Cameron Studio Select Fastback; Ball: Callaway Hex Chrome+  Grips:  PURE Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5609 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Hello all.  I'm about to be 57 yrs old, started playing when I was 16, and have quit and restarted the game more times than I can count.  I had started playing a weekly round with a friend, and finally made the jump to Senior A shafted Tour Edge clubs.  Instantly gained 10 yds with an easier swing (why didn't I make that jump sooner???).  Glad to be a part of the group. Cheers all,
    • I think I like this hole.  It is a clear "Risk-Reward" choice.  Since most of the shots in your cone cleared the bunkers I would say they are a minor risk and not a big issue.  Playing the aggressive line may give you 70ish yards in from what looks to be playable rough while conservative play is 120ish from fairway.  I know you said 70 vs 120 is minor for you but how does the approach angle in impact your results?  I figure both strategies are playing for Birdie since holing out from either is mostly luck. Looking at your proximity hole I think it says @ 50 feet when hitting from the fairway from 100-150 and 40 feet if hitting 50-100 from the rough.  Neither of those is an easy birdie putt.   I like the approach angle from the rough between the bunkers & the adjacent tees over the angle from @ 120 in the fairway but I really do not like the idea of hitting onto the adjacent tee boxes and that may impact my confidence with making the shot.  Also, too far left may be a worse approach angle then from the fairway short of the bunkers. For me this may come down to how confident do I feel when I reach that tee box.  If I am stroking it well off the tee leading up to the hole I would try for over the bunkers and the better angle in but if I am struggling that day I would likely opt for the fairway to take more bad stuff out of play.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨🟨🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,035 1/6 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Finally. Been waiting for this.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨⬜🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...