• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
-BAMA-

400-425 cc drivers

15 posts in this topic

other than the r7... who else makes drivers with a head smaller than 460cc??
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

titleist 905s is a few years old but its 400cc
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i just picked up an older model titleist 983k. i love the look of it at address but havent gotten used to hitting it yet. anybody ever had one of these drivers??
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Titleist 909 D3

seriously looking into one of these...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, the 905S/T are both sub 460, i have a tour issue one upstairs, fantastic club. The 909's are good clubs, but so are the 905's and 907's.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

seriously looking into one of these...

Well, to be quite technical, the 909 D3 is 440 cc. I still play my r7 Quad.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a old Titliest 975J that i use every now and then. Im not sure of the size but i assume its around 400cc.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I definitly do not like the 460 drivers, but haven't found a new model in a couple years that is less than 440cc (which is what the Titleist 909D5 is, I think). I was just looking at the Hot List today and they have the list of sizes with a few models less than 460, but not much smaller. I would love to see some of the new technology in a smaller head. I currently play a TaylorMade R540XD and have for years. I have owned 3-4 other drivers in 460cc size since purchasing the 540, but always go back to it because I prefer the smaller size and feel it's easier to 'work' than the larger heads.

I would love to find a new driver in that 390-425 size and I expect every year that someone will come out with one. Johnny Miller in Golf Digest or Magazine said in his column a year or 2 ago that he expected to see manufacturers start to design and sell smaller headed drivers in a couple years and I'm still waiting.

(And 'Yes' I know the Cleveland HiBore models until the Monster have been less than 460, but they still look like 460 and the Callaway FT-i was also under 460, but it was too expensive and didn't feel right.)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the new nike dymos come in smaller cc versions. I want to say around 380cc's. Its the model Kim has been using and nike says that tiger is going to use when he comes back.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

try to find a r7 425 cheap of of ebay or and taylormade r510tp its an amazing driver
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The new TM R9 is 420 i believe and the the R7 limted is 440. The driver I use, Hibore XL Tour is a great river and i thnk its under 400- although it might be just over but is def under 460 and i love the small head as it is much easier to work and the 3 dgree open face suits my game perfectly
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i hit the r7 425... its just not my style...

i just hate these 460 heads... its like swinging a coffee can on a stick, i wish they'd bring back the launcher 400....

im not consistent enough to get one of the titleists drivers....
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The older callaway erc fusion is smaller but easier to hit than the titlest..that was a great driver if you can get over the sound, and there was a 2005 model cobra that came in a 400cc size that was supposed to be aimed at middle handicappers
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • No Forearm Rotation - Biggest Swing Flaw?
      That's not my username. Which is why it didn't tag me. I disagree that "forearm rotation" (of any kind, really) is the "biggest swing flaw." I think there are many things I'd rank as bigger flaws than this. I don't find that I have to cover this a ton during my lessons. There are several things I cover more frequently. I would say that everyone has a different amount of what's "correct" for them. (And it's not actually perpendicular, and the amount that it's off from perpendicular depends as much on how high the lead arm is at the top of the backswing, which has nothing to do with forearm rotation or arm rotation of any kind, really.) I have no idea what that actually means. There's nothing "natural" about something being perpendicular. We're talking about the human body, after all, and to get it to be perpendicular it takes 90° of rotation! Also, as I said above, they're not actually perpendicular, and the degree by which they're off of perpendicular depends on how high the lead arm is, not any rotational amount. If your arm exactly matches your shoulder plane, they have a chance of being perpendicular, or very close, but few people swing at exactly on that plane. You've yet to define "natural motion," nor do you in this post. Weight transfer does little to disrupt the center of the golf swing (not that there is truly a point that is the center of the golf swing - I'm speaking somewhat colloquially). A weight transfer primarily involves the hips going forward during the downswing, not the point between the shoulders that sort of acts as a "hub" in the center of the swing arc. Again, the "center" is more of a smallish region and not actually a specific point, but… it generally stays in the same place in good players, so the weight transfer has little to do with it. In other words, robots can accurately reproduce the golf swing if they simply have a wrist, because the "center" of the golf swing is a pretty small region. But, I don't want to spend much time talking about this as I have no idea how it relates to your idea that there should be zero forearm rotation during the swing. I don't know what graph you're looking at. In the last one I posted, the right wrist starts at 54° pronated and supinates 83° to end up at 29° supinated. In case you were referring to another graph, though it had to be one with the right wrist shown (only one other graph), also shows the lead wrist as about 50° pronated going into about 16° supinated thought the backswing. I'm not sure you know how to read these graphs or where 0° truly exists. It's not got much to do with how your arms hang at your sides. The measurements are relative to the proximal segment. You've said a lot of things earlier, including "the forearms should rotate zero degrees" (paraphrased). And, again, the right wrist starts out 50° pronated, and supinates 66° (or more - it supinates 83° in the other graph) throughout the backswing. If you want to talk about the rotation, you can't just talk about the rotation after it passes a zero point. Imagine a golfer's wrist started at "80" and ended up at "0" (I don't care if it's supination or pronation for this particular question) - would you say that golfer didn't rotate his forearm because it was at 0 when you chose to take a measurement? Or would you say the golfer rotated it 80° throughout the backswing? The latter is the only answer that makes any sense. The golfer rotated it 80°. Not 0°. Not 20°. Please stop saying things as if they're fact. Who is to say 40° is "too flat"? Who is to say 5° is "too steep"? Maybe for that particular player they're appropriate. Plus, again, in the examples above we saw supination of 66° and 83°. We saw pronation of (in the same two graphs) of 50° (32° to -18°) and 66° (50° to -16°). The initial measurement has quite a bit to do with grip strength - how turned the hands are clockwise or counter-clockwise on the grip. It has quite a bit to do with the elbow location, too. The right wrist supinates during the backswing. It doesn't pronate. You made this mistake frequently. Again, it doesn't turn or rotate only 20°. More like 50, 66, 83°… The shoulder turn doesn't flatten appreciably with a longer club. Re: the fifth point… this is from another thread, but here's Tiger hitting a driver and a short iron. The line is across his lead arm, but his shoulder pitch is nearly the same at this point, as you can see. Both of the numbers read "42°." I imagine you'll find if you study good golfers that the shoulder plane does not change appreciably with different clubs. I'll stop here, except to ask a simple question about the video at the end… honestly because I haven't got a clue what you're saying the rest of the way. You seem to imply that Tiger and Sergio have bad full swings because they don't do whatever it is you're talking about. You implied, if I read it correctly, that Tiger won because of his short game and putting, and is injured because of his full swing. You implied, again if I read it correctly, that Sergio is has a poor full swing, and that his backswing sequencing is off… Yet… Tiger gained more strokes with his full swing (even driving) than he did with his short game and putting. Tiger's full swing has been a HUGE factor in why he's been so dominant, and why he wins as often as he does (or did). Look at that… he gained 1.64 strokes with his approach shots and less than half that with his short game and putting combined. That year was not an anomaly, either: Tiger dominated largely due to his ballstriking, not his short game and putting as you seem to want to contend. Here's another look: Sergio, too, btw is well regarded for his ball-striking. He's consistently been one of the top 20 golfers in the world for a long, long time now. He's currently 16th in the OWGR. Sergio is also pretty high up on the list of strokes gained for driving and approach shots (or tee-to-green). What does that video have to do with anything? It is curious, though, that the robot also rotates its mechanical "forearms" quite a bit in making its backswing.
    • My Swing (coop6)
      Best drills for me are piecing it together the way I want it but always hitting a ball.  I like to go to p2 correct, then Pivot to the top without any arm lift. I then get to p5 where I want it and hit the ball with a good MOrAD p8/8.5 position.    Then I'll do the same except pause at p4 then hit it from there exaggerating my changes. My issues is over flexing the rt arm and over hinging wrist. I'm trying to feel the rt elbow leading and moving faster than the shoulder.
    • My Swing (coop6)
      @coop6 Assuming you guys are working on the connection as you stated earlier, I'm curious to see how you fix it. I struggle with the connection when I'm having off days, and I can't find a good fix. The towel under arms is the original fix, but i structors don't like it, I don't like it, and even Dufner seems to have inconsistencies, though he uses it in his warm up routine. I saw that your drill was moving the arms first from the top to about hip level, and rehearsing this motion several times. I'm trying to find or think of other drills. If you find something you're willing to share and your instructor doesn't mind would love to try it myself.
    • Share a Fact from Your Job
      Moreover, why would a bank bother to provide mortgages at all if they are losing money on them?
    • PGA Tour Caddies file class-action suit against PGA Tour for use of likeness, bibs
      The tour doesn't fine the caddies in any way, they just fine the player because the player didn't follow the stipulated rules of the tournament. The player can fine the caddy because the player employs him, the PGA does nothing with the caddies besides provide the players with uniforms for them to wear.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries