Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
I KyotE I

grip question

11 posts in this topic

today I went to the range and I found out that if I grip with my right hand having the thumb pointing straight on e top of the grip I slice bad. Now when I turn the club closed alittle grip it and then make it so the club is square, this makes my right hand fingers point up...not the most comfy grip but when I did it I hit everything straight. I was wondering if anyone else has had to do this. and if needed I can post pics. I know it isn't easy to visualize what I am saying.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Rotating your hands to the right on the grip (as you described) is called strengthening your grip. You can also strengthen your left hand grip. Having your right thumb directly on top of the grip would be considered a pretty weak grip. Typically, a strong grip will close the clubface more at impact than a weak grip. Your slice could've been at least in part due to a weak grip (another major factor for many golfers is an outside to in swing). Good luck with the new grip!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tend to place my thumbs off the top of the shaft when I grip. The left thumb is at 1:00 (if the top of the shaft is 12:00) and my right thumb is around 11:00. I never place my thumbs at the top of the shaft for wood and iron shots. I do place the thumbs near the top for my putter, though.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the input. I am still looking for some lessons as I am almost sure on the outside to in swing could be hindering me as well. Is a strenghening my grip a bad thing? I know there is no one right swing or anything but is that considered a band-aid to my swing?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. Strengthening your grip is a very good thing. Very hard for most any amateur to square the club face with a weak grip. You want to be able to see at least the two biggest knuckles on your glove hand as you address the ball. Weak grip promotes slicing action and more severely, the shanks....
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Strenghtening the grip is not a bad thing. You will know when you get too strong. Also consider that what now feels like a strong grip, may be very neutral. I'm not ashamed to admit that it took me some 2 years to really get my grip where I want it. Grip changes always feel very unatural at first.

I wish there was more attention payed to the grip (which I understand is a boring subject to many) than to all the full swing mechanics, checkpoints and theories. IMHO if you are getting a straight ball flight, you are squaring your clubface pretty well. It's hard to square the clubface with a poor grip. Once I started hitting a straight ball I knew my grip was getting close to where I wanted it. But then I was hitting straight pulls. Before my grip changes, if I pulled it, my poor grip put a cut on the ball and made the results WAY better than the swing. A pull cut can still center cut the fairway.

Only after I started hitting a straight ball (straight pull) with a good grip was I able to know I was coming over the top. After filming myself I was able to see what needs fixing and I'm now working on that. But I would have never gotten to that point had I not worked my grip into a nice position.

I'm amazed at how much I held the grip in my palms in the past. Now, with the butt of the club set really deep in my fingers, I can hold the club with almost zero grip pressure. My wrists hinge naturally. If I resist the urge to hit, and just let it flow, the face squares naturally with no manipulation whatsoever.

Sounds like you are on the right path! You are starting where the rubber meets the road - or in this case where the hands meet the club.

Good Luck!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have often fought a slice in my game and yes like most amatures i probably do have the outside to inside swing but this thread has got be thinking about my grip. When i just went and grabbed a club and gripped it and looked at my golved hand i can see the first knuckle easy but the second one is barley visible. I rotate by thumb to the 1 o'clock postions like someone said before and it seemed to square up the face at adress even more. Is this what it is supposed to do? My only question is when i didn't that it seems i need a little more grip pressure to hold the club.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i feel in the minority both my thumbs are in the middle,which someone said was weak hmm i fel strange now.lol
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JMHO knuckles and thumbs and such are OK indicators of your grip. But you can grip the club poorly, twist your hands into position and have what looks like a good grip.

I think it was Sam Snead (maybe not) that Harvey Pennick told the story about that went like this.

The amateur asked the pro (Snead?) if he could see the calluses on his hands. The pro said he didn't have any calluses, although he obviously had hit a ton of balls over the decades. Pennick went on to say that blisters and calluses come from putting your hands on the grip and then twisting them into what looked like a good position. He said to get your hands in the right position the first time.

I am no expert obviously as my handicap will show. I've just really been thinking about the grip a lot lately. The feeling of a good grip is a lot like casting an open faced fishing reel. I bass fish in a lot of ponds where the moss is so thick you can only use a plastic worm with no weights or sinkers. To really throw that extra light bait out there you need to have fluid wrists, and not try to over power your cast. The only way I've been able to do this is by holding the rod loosely in my throwing hand in my fingers. It's a finesse thing more than a power thing. That same feeling reminds me of a good golf grip.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i feel in the minority both my thumbs are in the middle,which someone said was weak hmm i fel strange now.lol

I use the same grip, with both thumbs on top, because it feels natural, and a "strong" grip produces a hook for me.

Not sure why its called weak. I suppose its refering to how aggresively, or unaggresively, the club face is turning over during and after impact.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure why its called weak. I suppose its refering to how aggresively, or unaggresively, the club face is turning over during and after impact.

I always wondered that myself. If I had to guess I'd say you are right. It is a problem for a lot of beginners, that misnomer as it were. I know it was for me. If someone said grip it stronger, I'd probably have squeezed like hell.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • My Swing (PumaAttack)
      Dude, he like, literally, answered some of the questions you're asking in this post in the post you quoted. You are right about one thing, though.  If you're already working with an instructor, you shouldn't be muddying the waters with advice from other sources.  In fact, Erik and Mike make points to not offer advice when they know that, so you should have just mentioned that from the start.
    • My Swing (PumaAttack)
      @mvmac @iacas I have a friend who is also on Evolvr and got feedback today from his coach that his swing is looking great and has no changes at this time. I looked at his swing.  He goes from really shallow at A3 and then slightly steeper at a5.  Why is that ok for him and not for me?  Seems a little hypocritical, eh?
    • 2016 DEAN & DELUCA Invitational
      Still a shot for the top 3 players in the world to all have won the last tournament they played at the same moment in time, which I don't believe has ever happened in the history of the game.  #pgatourhasneverbeenbetter    Ok, that hash tag was a little douchy, but c'mon, this shit is good.
    • Lowest score you've seen?
      Lowest ive ever witnessed is 71 twice by me.Thats saying something considering I play in tournys with very good players.My 71s were not in tourny conditions though.
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      But because they play on courses that are considered quite difficult compared to the average home course, wouldn't their up & down % be expected to increase due to having closer misses on average - particularly with slower greens to hold approaches? The comment above is not to discount this, but only emphasize how the two go together. If you apply a fantastic long game on a shorter course on average they will have an easier time being more consistent and hitting the ball closer to the pin on average and therefore making more putts. Or do you think they would have the same expected proximity on one of our home courses as they would on the tougher tour courses and setups? I get you on the tournament prep being very different to hitting a course blind, but to some extent the OP is comparing how we play on our home courses day-in, day-out vs. the tour pros moving from place to place. How would we score visiting a course blind relative to our home course where most of the scores are posted and we are very familiar with the layout and greens. Granted pros make it a point to know this stuff with yardage books and memory. Still switching between venues and conditions rather suddenly vs. gradual changes we would tend to experience on a home course must add some difficulty. I came across a good study that analyzed all PGA tournament scores for 2007 including field average adjustments. He had the unadjusted scoring average that year as 70.704. If you figure the average course setup is ~ CR 75 and add one stroke for 'tournament conditions' (and added difficulty of Major setups) then that was about 5.3 strokes below average rating. So relative to a Course Rating (slope should not matter to a pro), and assuming a standard normal distribution, 95% of the scores should range between -6.7 and -3.9 below the rating. However, his analysis detected two interesting features, the curve (with a ton of samples) is approximately symmetric with a ~ .4 skewness. This right skew means the most frequently expected result (the mode) is actually slightly lower than the mean. So that implies that even on tour setups the lower than average scores are expected just a bit more frequently (the left tail and shoulder are slightly thicker and probability for scores lower than the mode slightly higher.). Here's an approximation of what the distribution would look like relative to strokes below the CR. In comparing courses with higher average scores (like the U.S. Open) the study found that the standard deviation of scores increased. The 'tougher test' created more of a separation between the players. Also the players whose scores tended to skew left were poorer players on average in terms of results. They averaged a relatively high score, but they could go really low sometimes. The relevance this has to the thread is that on the easier home courses that most of us tend to play, the tour players would be more bunched in their expected scores with higher probabilities around the mean of -5.3 relative to the CR and possibly more toward the low side with the left-skewing, less-consistent scorers reducing the size of the right tail and extending the left while holding the 'field average' the same. It could skew the distribution toward lower expected score (though the most frequently expected value would still be around the mode). But what would you expect as a total spread for the average scratch population? You agree that with the average population of golfers by handicap there's a decrease in score variability with increasing skill versus the average population at each handicap level having the same average scoring distribution, yes? IMO, the answer to the OP greatly depends on the CR. On my course from the tips, they'd be expected to shoot under 65 over 50% of the time. On a CR of 72, I'd expect  below 67 over 50% of the time. At Oakmont (in non-Open setup), under 73 over 50% of the time. And that would be without accounting for a possible 'going low' effect from the typically easier home course setups we face (not including Oakmont there. They would face some hazards you don't find on tour either - lost balls could be an issue for some. I'm not sure I agree that they'd expect to putt worse. At the least because I would expect their proximity to the hole to increase on all shots due to the typically shorter length (shorter irons on average into each hole) along with relatively slower, softer greens.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bigtosh90
      bigtosh90
      (26 years old)
    2. dopplegvnger
      dopplegvnger
      (24 years old)
    3. Frank62
      Frank62
      (54 years old)
  • Blog Entries