• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dmbisbest

Irons for 15-20 Handicapper with thin top line?

21 posts in this topic

I am looking for a solid iron that allows me room to improve but also some forgiveness. I am about a 17 hc now but hit my irons pretty solid (I tend to get into trouble off the tee). I want a thin top line, that is very important to me.

Looking at Ping I10, Cleveland CG7 (Tour?), Titleist AP2 but am very intrigued by the Nike VR Forged Split Cavity. Maybe the Bridgestone GC Mids?

Help!!! Thanks in advance.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Have you considered Mizuno MP-57 or MP-52? I started with mine at 23 handicap.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I like the CG7 Tour irons. I haven't heard anything bad about them really. Think that is what I'm going to do this summer when I get the money. I hit a few at Golf Galaxy a couple weeks ago and those things are sweeeeeet!
But it's ultimately up to you, hit a few and see which one fits your game the best.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like my Tour Preferreds. Got them when I was about a 20. Only now am I seeing are REALLY awesome they are that I'm starting to work the ball....

The only clubs I demo'd that really stood out to me aside from these. And if I wasn't TaylorMade biased I probably would've gotten were the Bridgestone J36... not the blades.... but I forget if it was the pocket cavity or the one in between.

On a side note: I think the TPs are pretty forgiving (at least for me as a 20hc) clubs from about the 5iron-PW. Not until recently am I really being able to take advantage of my 3 and 4 irons. (not sure how much of this is the +1" length clubs I'm playing, btw)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you considered Mizuno MP-57 or MP-52? I started with mine at 23 handicap.

I got my 57s at 28hcp and am down to 22 and play best with those sticks (trouble with driver/hybrid).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the Nike Forged CCi's have a super thin top line (not the cast)
as well as the Nike Pro Forged Combo's
and i guess some oldy's, Cleveland TA2's (my old irons)

im sure there are more, but some thoughts for ya
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i like the look of the mp52 which is what i think i am gonna get soon. they have a thin top line and quite a thick sole for a 'sorta players iron'
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why the need for a "thin" topline? How does that have any bearing on performance?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why the need for a "thin" topline? How does that have any bearing on performance?

For me It affects my brain. When I look down at a thick topline I'm just not comfortable for some reason and my shots end up worse. I

want to play a more forgiving club and am trying but it's worse so far than my blades
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out these irons - http://thesandtrap.com/clubs/nickent...o_irons_review

I know they're a few years old, but they're basically a player's cavity back - feels like a blade when struck properly but offers some forgiveness with minimal offset and a thin top line. Lower trajectory, but I prefer that anyway :)

You can probably find a brand new set online for $200, maybe less!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me It affects my brain. When I look down at a thick topline I'm just not comfortable for some reason and my shots end up worse. I

I guess I am lucky. I don't care what the club looks like in the bag or at address as long as the ball goes where it is supposed to.

I find I play better when I don't think too much. Like on the greens, read the put for 10 seconds and then go after the hole!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me It affects my brain. When I look down at a thick topline I'm just not comfortable for some reason and my shots end up worse. I

I totally agree w that. I really dont like it when I look down and see that fat topline. Similar to the reason I use a 425cc driver vs a 460cc driver.

thanks for the input from everyone. has anyone hit the new VRs from Nike?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree w that. I really dont like it when I look down and see that fat topline. Similar to the reason I use a 425cc driver vs a 460cc driver.

I hit the full cavities. They were ok. I didn't hit them as well as I hit the X-22 or x-22 tours. I am getting new clubs at some point and am going with the X-22 with Proj X 5.5 shafts. Look into the Adams Idea pro golds. They have a nice thin topline and dicks is closing them out for $500.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If your looking for something to grow into, I'd go with a combo set of Adams Idea forged are nice and forgiving decently cheap and have a thin blade like topline and a couple hybrids.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just splurged on a set of Ping G10s (I need a little dab of game-improvement) because of how pleasantly surprised I was with some demo clubs at the driving range. I'd definitely recommend the I10s for someone with more experience/consistency.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hogan Apex Edge. Forged, Blade style with a cavity and low sole weight. Remind me of the MP52s, $300 brand new 4-AW.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the input from everyone. has anyone hit the new VRs from Nike?

I just got back into golf this year after a 10 year layoff and I have the same mental problem with looking down at anything but a thin topline.

I bought the VR Forged set back in March and I have to say they're great.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love my AP2s. Tried the VR splits recently at a Nike demo day and just did not like them compared to my AP2s. Not sure what it was, but they just didn't feel right...and I wanted to like them. Went back and fourth between my 6 iron and the Nike 6 iron and it was a very different feel.

Each to their own though.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • My Swing (coop6)
      It pretty much is, I'm not going to debate 5 degrees with you. As I've said repeatedly, Tiger's swing and a standard swing do not require rotation. On this shot he rotated 5 degrees, not much. If you want to play with rotation to closed enjoy. I prefer to keep the club square. 
    • Struggles of turning pro
      http://thesandtrap.com/blogs/ Normally you must be an Established Member to create a blog, but I've enabled this for you now.
    • No Forearm Rotation - Biggest Swing Flaw?
      Completely bogus. The arms (forearms) rotate in every good golf swing. Here's an old thread that's appropriate for this discussion.   Also, I don't think I've ever really seen a golfer, throughout his backswing, rotate his forearms the opposite way. For short periods of time, maybe a few golfers "counter-rotate," but all end up rotating some. No, there won't be "arguments" over this, or there shouldn't be, because… like many things, this is pretty much a fact. There really doesn't need to be an argument or a discussion. It's a knowable, understandable thing. Hunter, like every other PGA Tour pro, rotates his forearms during the backswing. You're rotating your arms as you do this. It's subtle, but if you just pick the club up straight without rotating, you'll have the shaft resting against the top of your head. Look at where the back of your left hand points. Toward the target at setup, and then rotated to put the club on your right shoulder. Turn to the top when the club is on your face or the top of your head and the club will be leaning out over the target line (it'll be roughly parallel to your bend toward the ball, since it's basically just staying inline with your spine). Bending your right arm rotates your forearms. It pulls everything to the right (you can't bend your right arm straight in front of you without also bending your left arm). Then even more rotation is added after that. I agree that you don't want to be doing a lot of "things" on the downswing, but that's not how physics works. You can do all sorts of things on the backswing and not do them on the downswing. We have students who swing steep to steep, steep to shallow, shallow to steep, shallow to shallow, and all sorts of things. We have students who address the ball with a closed clubface, roll it way open, and then return it wide open, etc. The "equal and opposite" does not mean a delayed reaction - it means that if I push on something it will, right at that very moment, push back. If I fire rocket propulsion downward, the missile or space shuttle or whatever will move upward. You don't fire rockets and then, a week later, a different missile takes off as a "reaction." Furthermore, PGA Tour players have a variety of backswings. Ray Floyd was underneath, Rickie Fowler or Ryan Moore are steep or over the top on the backswing. The golfer who comes closest to the "square" or "no rotation" backswing is a guy who CAN'T really rotate his forearms: Tim Clark. And even Tim rotates some. But notice how far "out over his head" the clubhead is, despite the fact that he's well short of parallel on the backswing. It's so much more than that. I ask people in my lessons how much skill or raw natural talent it takes to set up properly. The correct answer: none. They just have to know how to do it. If golf was as simple as "set up properly and then turn" we'd all be a whole lot better than we are. Golfers can be set up the same and make very, very different backswings, and both can be successful. So Bubba is doing it wrong? And what does that have to do with the swing flaw of "rotating your forearms"? (Is overswinging a big problem? Absolutely. More, IMO, for what it tends to do to the trail elbow and the subsequent inability of the player to get the arms and hands down fast enough. I'll never really argue against overswinging, except when it's made as a blanket statement covering all golfers who go past parallel or something.) Also, you said (though it feels off topic since this is mostly about forearm rotation, n'est-ce pas?) "the more you have to wait for them to come down." That's not really true - you can MAKE them come down faster. Your arms aren't just limp things hanging from your shoulders that get dragged behind your hips and torso rotating. Because, biomechanically, making a swing with no forearm rotation would be ridiculous and resemble the golf swings of precisely no good players, ever. Tim Clark comes closest, and people don't even copy his swing, and if Tim Clark's forearms would rotate as most people's do, even Tim Clark would have a different golf swing. Modeling your golf swing on someone with a disability hardly seems like the prudent choice. My last piece of evidence, right here: This should drive the point home pretty significantly. Spoiler One last thing here. Consider the sagittal plane (in the spoiler above, just so it's not taking up a ton of space) and the back of the left hand (assuming a right-handed golfer). At address, they're parallel - the back of the left hand is parallel to the sagittal plane. Yet at the top of the backswing, what do we see? The sagittal plane (at the point of attachment of the arms, i.e. near the shoulders) is about 90° from where it started. It's inclined at about 35° or so, but otherwise just is still just a plane bisecting the sternum, neck, face, etc. What plane is the back of the left wrist on? Why, it's one that's about 90° to the sagittal plane. I've illustrated this here: In this illustration, I've drawn a little "cube" in the screen on the left. The green face of the cube is parallel to the sagittal plane (the edge of the plane is pointing "at the camera"). The blue side - perpendicular to the green side - is parallel to the back of the left hand. It too is pointing at the camera, but has rotated about 90°. That's why it's parallel to a perpendicular side of the cube. On the right, above, to make the back of Mike's left hand parallel the green face of the cube, he'd have to rotate his arms BACK about 90° to the red line. Now, then, @Golfer2223, you'd set a record as the first human being in history to present an argument as you have done and immediately recognize, given my response and a little thought on your part, that you want to take back your entire argument and completely change your position. In other words, I don't expect that to happen. A small part of me hopes it will some day, but I don't think today is going to be that day. But, realistically, that's what should happen. As I see it, you have no real ground to stand on here. Not biomechanically, not based on simple geometry, nothing. The arms rotate during the backswing in EVERY good player. Even in Tim Clark's backswing (or he'd truly have the club hanging out over his head. I will also say this, @Golfer2223: I appreciate your willingness to help, and to jump in, and to offer your thoughts on things. I hope you can take this rebuttal in the spirit in which it's intended - to help and to discuss. I don't know who you are (you should add more info to your profile), and I'm not responding just to be mean, but to help people learn, think critically, and better understand the golf swing. We encourage debate and discussion here, and that's all my response is to be taken as - more debate and discussion. Do I think I'm right? Yes. And I think I've backed up why. P.S. As someone noted above, often students need to feel like there's no rotation in the backswing. But that doesn't make it accurate.
    • Northern Michigan Courses
      I have been to Northern Michigan on several occasions. There are a lot of great golf courses but they are SPREAD OUT so keep driving distance in mind.   Arcadia Bluffs Forest Dunes True North Little Traverse Bay Belvedere Dunmaglas Black Lake Grand Traverse Resort (Nicklaus and Player Course) Lochenheath  Leelanau Boyne Hills Course   These are all EXCELLENT golf courses that are worth playing
    • Crandon/Key Biscayne or Biltmore
      Wow, tough choice! Key Biscayne or Crandon. Either one would be awesome.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries