• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
zrlaegel

How much does your clubhead speed change between clubs Driver-LW?

14 posts in this topic

How much does your clubhead speed change between clubs Driver-LW?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Shorter shaft, steeper angle, less arc. Pretty simple math, there. Personally, i would never take a full swing a LW so i guess ill never know..
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i cant remember ever taking a full swing with one either. i get the math idea. the reason i was asking is because i was in the 90s with a 3 wood but im well over 100 with a driver and i was curious to see if anyone had the same experience or if i was just off.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. Im similar. I swing my driver between 105 & 110 but im somewhere in the low 100's- high 90's with a three wood.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently tested a 76mph 7-iron clubhead speed. No idea what my driver speed is, but I'm pretty certain I'm in the R-flex range.

A buddy of mine tested 87 7-iron 105 driver. Not sure if this information helps you.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Angular velocity is proportional to the radius from the point around which the point (club head) is moving, assuming the point is moving at a constant rate in degrees/sec or radians/sec (ie, the point makes a circle around the axis of rotation in the same amount of time regardless of distance from the axis). So your swing speed for a 7i should be approximately equal to the length of your 7i divided by the length of your driver times your swing speed for your driver.

Obviously this is pretty rough, but it works out for Shindig's example numbers.

Say a standard driver is 44", and a standard 7i is 36.5" (from http://www.golfspyder.com/golf-club-length.html ). Then the driver speed for Shindig's friend should be 87 * (44/36.5) = 104.87, which is obviously quite close to 105!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I average 110 driver, 90 six iron. I usually reserve the 60 for around the green, but I've tried a full swing with a 60 at the driving range, and it only went about 70 yds. You could go for a smoke break waiting for it to come down though... :)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I average 110 driver, 90 six iron. I usually reserve the 60 for around the green, but I've tried a full swing with a 60 at the driving range, and it only went about 70 yds. You could go for a smoke break waiting for it to come down though... :)

And your hitting 5.5's???

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No one takes full swings with a lob wedge? It's a great club, it goes about 85 yards, and you can drop it on a dime every time. I swing the driver like 115, and the LW about 65.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And your hitting 5.5's???

Yea, I screwed up. My S57s had 6.0s and I was hitting them fine, but someone (who should know) recommended I try a slightly softer shaft. Wife and I are looking at renting a house in a few months, and then I'll setup a build/repair station in the garage. I'll probably replace them then.

That's what I get for listening to someone elses's recommendations, instead of using my own judgement. That will teach me eh?
No one takes full swings with a lob wedge? It's a great club, it goes about 85 yards, and you can drop it on a dime every time. I swing the driver like 115, and the LW about 65.

I don't leave myself that yardage in, so I only use it when I miss my approach and short-side myself, have to flop one on a green that slopes away, etc.. If I hit a full LW into a green it would never hold. It would come zipping right back at me. The courses I play are kinda soft. :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does swing speed even matter when it comes to a LW? I want control, not overall distance. In reality, what is more important than swing speed is the timing of the swing. The swing should take the same time with a LW as with a driver. The LW is swung slower and shorter, the driver is longer and faster, but the time from beginning to end should be just about the same.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does swing speed even matter when it comes to a LW?

Maybe he was just curious...?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I don't leave myself that yardage in, so I only use it when I miss my approach and short-side myself, have to flop one on a green that slopes away, etc.. If I hit a full LW into a green it would never hold. It would come zipping right back at me. The courses I play are kinda soft. :)

You should really work at it, its by far the most valuable club in the bag. I swing about the same speed as you (driver 115 or so) and have spun off plenty of greens, but I can cut the spin out of it, or leave the spin in it. The lob wedge is actually quite easy to get the spin out of. The key is to use the ball position to control spin. Put it forward and sweep under it to get a nice soft landing, and put it backward and rip into it for bite.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm 18hcp, and hit a P wedge 88mph yesterday, but probably hit about as full as I would ever want to hit a wedge, and it was off a carpet.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • How do I organize a charity tournament to be a raging success?
      26 and a stroke? Holy smokes. Very sorry to hear that.  I have no idea how to organize a tournament but I have played in my share. The best ones are scrambles where you can organize your own team. The outcome has rarely ever mattered to us as long as we were well fed. Find a local restaurant (usually a bbq place) that wants to help you out and give a discount for advertising and spend your money there. Everyone will love to come for a good meal. Some nice prizes and maybe a raffle with some local companies offering you something if you are able to convince them it is worth it to give something to the cause.  Another thing I have seen work well is a silent auction at the end with donated items. I donated airline miles of which I have tons and 100,000 miles went for $205. Free gift for me and the cause got $205. 
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Haha - I get a couple of reputation points for a post and then go and have a blow up hole. Good drive, left myself 145 in down hill (8i), aimed #deadcenter, pulled 2 shots 25 yards left out of bounds, made 9 (+5) in a 9 hole round of (+11). A better way to avoid blow up holes - play stableford!
    • Donald Trump for president?
      Come on now, that's a bit uncalled for in Bernies case.  His political ideals might be way left, but he is at least honest and virtuous.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I'll have to examine your other post closer. That's a good point to consider about the expansion to Continental Europe. Largely explains the poor showing of UK & Ireland in the 60's with many top tier European players not eligible. But considering the 200 million U.S. population base to 63 million in the U.K. & Ireland at the time, the latter did surprisingly well if population base was all that matters. IMO an established competitive golfing culture matters in producing elite players too. Those same European players excluded from Ryder Cup were always eligible for the Majors. The Ryder Cup is also a limited field event. It concentrates the 12 top players of the European Tour. From what I've read, depth of field is still stronger for the 'typical' PGA event, though some non-major Euro events are now stronger than some of the 'minor' PGA events. That is a significant change in Euro competitiveness from the 60's. To some extent that 30% drop sounds like it could be due to simply more international players occupying slots in the fields. If the period you mention covers when majors started to use OWGR for automatic qualification that has some not insignificant inherent issues in terms of strength of field. Having a guaranteed start rather than having to qualify would certainly make for an easier decision to travel to the event. But I'm not arguing against the policy decision facilitating international competition with a little points boost just trying to point out that field strength may not have been as weak in Jack's day as you seem to think. Compared to his peers, which is really the only thing I think you can do without speculative nuance I agree there's no question he's the best golfer. I'm really just arguing that standouts of their caliber (so many more wins so many more majors) than typical players among already elite fields are so rare, that I expect they both represent near the achievable human pinnacle in golf talent, which I don't think really differs within a few generations. The nuances of comparison across eras is interesting to me so I'll debate relative points, but I'm against arguments undervaluing Jack's achievements against 'weak fields'. They both faced very stiff competition.   I'm not dissing Jack. I think his achievements are amazing. I also think the same of Tiger's record. IMO winning percentage per start in the Majors is a very significant stat and Tiger has that in his favor (they are both top 10 and within ~ 2% of each other's number). That number is not the official one for Jack though, I truncated his Major starts to end at age 47, which I think is a reasonable cutoff for competitiveness. If Tiger competes as long as Jack did his major win % (up to age 47) might stay about the same, increase, or decrease (more likely), but he certainly won't match the 18 Majors if he doesn't get like 22+ more major starts between now and age 47.
    • Wedges, Bounce, and Ground Conditions
      Typically more bounce (or a "healthy" amount of bounce) helps in any condition.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. glinks
      glinks
      (43 years old)
  • Blog Entries