• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
misty_mountainhop

Reflections on the Wilson FG Tour ball

4 posts in this topic

Thought I'd write a few thoughts on some recent experimentation with the new FG Tour ball from Wilson. Having seen the specs and noted the price point (~£21/$30) I thought it sounded like a ball that would be worth a bit of research with the Summer on the way.

I currently play either the Bridgestone B330-RX or the 330-RXS; both of which are excellent balls. They're mooted for slower swings but I like them a lot even though I'm probably supposed to play the B330-S on Bridgestone's fittings. I particularly like the softer feel for chipping/putting. That said, I have tried at one time or another most of the "tour" balls, the exception being those from Callaway.

I love the (in?)famous ProV1 but they're over-priced (IMO) and a I find a lot of the other equivalent balls don't have the durability that they should have given their prices.

So. I purchased a dozen FG Tours and have been using them the last week or two; sometimes alongside another "tour" ball during practice. Here are some of the observations:-

Driver:

I have no idea what my SS is really but a typical decent drive with no adverse conditions might average out at ~270 yards this time of year. The FG Tour was a very decent ball off the big stick; long without pulling up any trees so like most other "tour" balls I guess. I found it pretty similar to the ProV1, albeit with a slightly softer feel; not too mushy though. Trajectory was a nice mid-flight and somewhat lower than I was expecting (not sure why!); I've not had one balloon on me so far either. Decent carry with reasonable roll out. Not the straightest ball if you put a bad swing on it but that can be useful feature and a bad swing is a bad swing - no technology is going to save it.

Fairway woods:

Decent off these. My current fairway wood/shaft combination (Geek DCT w/ UST Proforce 75S) tends to give a lowish, penetrating flight whatever ball I use and the FG Tour is no different. Nice feel.

Long Irons:

Actually reasonably decent off these. No real trouble getting the ball airborne. Found the ball to be pretty workable when needed; after one cut tee shot (accidental!) which finished behind a tree, I was able to hit a really nice, big fade with a 3-iron around the tree onto the fringe of the green. Also able to hit a decent draw when required.

Mid-Irons:

Nice, mid flight. Good feel. Ball really shone with these. Reasonable stickability hitting into the putting surfaces.

Short Irons:

Exceptional, for me at least. Genuine "one hop and stop" behaviour with anything from the 7-iron down. Real fizz off some of the shorter irons at times when required. Mid-high flight. It's worth saying that in the week or two I was testing these we have had no rain and that there has been negligible for the ~2 weeks prior either. Courses are running fairly firm at the moment and all the greens I've been playing in to are pretty unyielding.

Putter:

Loved the ball off the flat stick. Quite soft feel which dovetails well with my insert-free Scotty.

Chipping:

I like a softer feeling ball for the short game and this fits the bill nicely. Quite similar in feel to the Bridgestone B330-RX but spins better.

Feel:

As the reader has probably gathered, I prefer a softer feeling ball but this is where some people may be put off using the FG Tour. To me at least, it's one of the softer feeling "tour" balls out there (softer than, say, the ProV1) and if you like a firmer feel off your irons/chips/putts it probably won't be for you.

Durability:

Another area where this ball shone. One ball was still good enough from the point of view of cover durability to still be in use for 56 holes. For one 18 hole round I was deliberately hitting the shorter club (and hitting it hard) when faced with a decision between two when approaching the green. Sometimes this meant really hitting all out with a GW or SW; not the most accurate(!) but the cover really stood up to the mistreatment. Far better than most other "tour" balls I've used.

Cons:

Well, there had to be some I guess. A minor con is that the cover, which is brilliant white to start with, dulls somewhat quite quickly. Not a lot, it's just noticeable. The ball may also be too soft in the feel department for some people, especially those that like the ProV1x/Z-StarX/B330 type of ball. The one major potential drawback however is this - on the 56th hole with one ball, it cracked. Not a cut in the cover, a proper crack in the ball. Now, 56 holes with the same ball is pretty good and to be fair it was getting a bit beaten up by now anyway but was definitely still playable. However, in addition to this one that I cracked a friend has told me he's cracked two himself but not sure after how many holes. Seen mention on GolfWRX of a similar instance as well; wonder what Wilson have to say on it? Not a deal breaker yet but worth keeping an eye on it.

Summary:

Good enough, especially at their price, to replace the Bridgestones in my bag as my ball of choice this Summer but will keep an eye on major structural failures. Wilson have a very good ball here but whether it will get the exposure it perhaps deserves is something I doubt.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

great review
not sure if that was you on wrx commenting on the ball cracking, BUT i have read that over there too
thats a lot of holes w one ball, but cracking shouldnt happen

i have heard good things about this ball for sure
I think Wilson Staff is making a BIG comeback
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice review, where have you seen them at £21? I haven't seen them for less than £29.99.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice review, where have you seen them at £21? I haven't seen them for less than £29.99.

I got them at £21 from

best4balls.com . Went back there the other day to order a few more dozen and they're now £24.99/doz. or £23.99/doz. for 3 or more dozen. When I got them they were £19.99/doz. for 3 or more. Free shipping on 2 dozen or more I think. Shop around; quite a few online sellers doing them at under £29.99/doz.
great review

Wasn't me at WRX. I read it before I bought them but didn't take it in until I cracked one myself and went back to make sure I didn't imagine it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Longer or More Accurate?
      That doesn't make it a trick question. People aren't so lousy with accuracy that they're off 200 yards, but their tee shots travel 200 yards toward the target fairly often. The 10% thing helps to adjust them to the proper scale. I hit my driver 270, but I don't miss by 1/4 of that distance (67.5 yards). The wildest 100-shooting golfers are about +/- 10°. Their average is about 7°. 80-golfers are around 6°. 70 golfers probably about 5°. PGA Tour pros are around 3.5°. So 10% of those numbers are 0.7, 0.6, and 0.5°, with 0.35° for PGA Tour players. And yet, give each of them a full 1° (or  14% more accuracy for 100-golfers, 17% more accuracy for 80-golfers, 20% more accuracy for 70-golfers, and nearly 30% more accuracy for PGA Tour players… and they still come up short (or, at the PGA Tour level, only begin to break even). This means that the poll is biased, indeed, but in the opposite direction you think, @Marty2019. The poll could have said "would you choose 25% more accuracy or 10% more distance" and everyone (generalized to groups, not individuals) would STILL be better off choosing the distance. The only "trick" is that people value accuracy way, way too much, to the point where many are happy to take only a 10% improvement in accuracy while even a 25% improvement still can't account for the added value of driving the ball an extra 10% farther.
    • Pace Problem
      Do I think our GM and Pro would adopt what I am suggesting as a course policy? No.  
    • New shoes
      I am looking for a new pair pair of golf shoes.  Since I am a cheapskate trying to stay under $100. Any ideas I like to walk and need them to be waterproof. 
    • Pace Problem
      You (or your mangers) still don't seem to understand that catching another group and playing through them is slower for both groups (and for any groups following them) than if they are all simply required by policy to keep the pace.  The rules are just swell, but playing through should only be something that happens in cases with extenuating circumstances, not a regular habit.  The Rules of Golf were never intended to be used as an excuse for a chronic inability to keep pace with the course. When the course allows certain groups make a habit of playing so slowly that other groups overtake them and have to play through, then you have failed in establishing and maintaining an effective pace of play policy.  That policy is mired in a time warp from the era when courses were never full.  Those days no longer exist and different steps must be taken if a course is really serious about their pace of play.  It's apparent that your course is more concerned about the minority than they are about the majority.  I hope that doesn't eventually bite them in the behind.
    • Pace Problem
      Again, that's been our tactic for seven years, and has not generally worked.  There is not a suggestion made in this thread that we don't do or haven't tried to speed slow groups up.  Some do, but mostly slow groups stay slow. As a rule of thumb, marshaling 18 holes takes about an hour.  If you attempt to "teach" the first time around, and then discover that you're a bad teacher or the slow group is a bad student when you come back around, by the time you "enforce", you have lost half a round of golf and you have forced faster groups to play the slower group's pace. When I see a group going to 9 at 2 1/2 hours, I tend to say, 'Oh, shit." to myself, because I know we've lost the Pace and it's next to impossible to get it back until that group has left the course.  Sadly, because of staffing cutbacks, that's often the case.  When I say something to the GM or Pro like, "If you want a good pace, you have to be out there from the beginning," it is not received well. If, OTOH, our policy is Pace has Priority on the Course, let faster groups play through, and that is what they hear when they pay, and from the Starter, and that's what the sign in the carts' signholder says, they have no leg to stand on the first time the marshal comes by and sees groups piled up behind a slow group. Yeah, I know, it's different than what everyone's used to. But if you always do what you've always done, you always get what you've always got.    
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. TessaEdin
      TessaEdin
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries