Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ronaldkuntoro

Optimum Driver Loft Calculator

20 posts in this topic

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Hmm, interesting, but I don't really believe it. This is why; my last driver had a measured loft of 11.8*, (but on the bottom of the club head it said 10.5*). Anyway I was able to hit it 260 yds, but with a ball rpm of 5600 which is way toooooo much spin.

LOL, after I put in my ave. ss of 107 mph it came up with a 11.7* driver for 247 yds hit at sea level. I live in Portland Or so I'm pretty much at sea level so IMO they are way off.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There a so many factors influencing the ball flight.
Swing speed and loft are among them, but there are also shaft, swing path, impact position, grip, driver head features.

I would not rely on this "formula" when buying a driver.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There a so many factors influencing the ball flight. Swing speed and loft are among them, but there are also shaft, swing path, impact position, grip, driver head features.

Yes, your actual launch conditions are more than just swing speed & club's loft. However, lots of magazines also suggest higher lofted drivers would benefit the majority of players. Looking at recent "winner's bags", Camilo Villegas, Jason Bohn, Adam Scott, and Jason Day are all using 10.5* drivers -- and i'd guarantee their swing speed is faster than 95% of readers of this forum! (However, i'm not sure if most of our ego's could take playing a driver with more than 10.5* loft, as they're often labelled "senior" or "ladies").

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I am saying: don't pick your driver based on your swingspeed.

Looking at recent "winner's bags", Camilo Villegas, Jason Bohn, Adam Scott, and Jason Day are all using 10.5* drivers -- and i'd guarantee their swing speed is faster than 95% of readers of this forum! (However, i'm not sure if most of our ego's could take playing a driver with more than 10.5* loft, as they're often labelled "senior" or "ladies").

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Titleist 975J 10.5 that I hit high and carry 230. I also have a 907 D2 that I hit worse than my 2h. The 975J has a 65 gram R shaft and the 902 has a 75 gram S shaft. I don't know much about shaft technology, but that has to account for a lot of the difference in the way I hit those two clubs.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, your actual launch conditions are more than just swing speed & club's loft. However, lots of magazines also suggest higher lofted drivers would benefit the majority of players. Looking at recent "winner's bags", Camilo Villegas, Jason Bohn, Adam Scott, and Jason Day are all using 10.5* drivers -- and i'd guarantee their swing speed is faster than 95% of readers of this forum! (However, i'm not sure if most of our ego's could take playing a driver with more than 10.5* loft, as they're often labelled "senior" or "ladies").

Very good point. I'd like to see their launch numbers.

This could be a condition of a tour players swing path versus the rest of us. As a tall guy with long arms, I likely swing too upright with my driver in comparison to a tour player. With an 8.5 and a 75g mid-kick shaft, I am launching right around 12.5 degrees, with 2600 rpms of spin. Higher lofts generate way too much (3500+) spin for me. check this out: http://www.rotaryswing.com/golf-inst...ch-monitor.php
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Titleist 975J 10.5 that I hit high and carry 230. I also have a 907 D2 that I hit worse than my 2h. The 975J has a 65 gram R shaft and the 902 has a 75 gram S shaft. I don't know much about shaft technology, but that has to account for a lot of the difference in the way I hit those two clubs.

Forgot to mention, the 907 is also 10.5 degrees.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got on the launch monitor when getting my driver, and the 10.5* driver with midkick, R shaft gave me the best results. Launch angle was about 13*.

On the Probable...Calculator: I plugged in my 85 mph swingspeed, and it said I should have a 14.4* driver, and would get 210 yds. total distance. With my current driver 10.5* driver, I get about 230 yards total distance on level ground.

And for drglew on fact Villegas and other winning pros have a 10.5* driver: I bet none of these guys have my R-flex, midkick shaft in their big stick. Shaft is at least as important as loft in club choice.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

yea thats not even close to accurate. using the swing speed i got off of the launch monitor at dicks (also not accurate), it says i should hit a 10 degree driver 258 with carry and roll. how could they assume that by only using swingspeed? on a average drive that i hit on the fairway it goes more like 290 and i have a 102-105 ish swing speed. my golf partner had a 105-108 swing speed and he hits it like 250 when he hits the fairway.

and that was a cool link that delav put up.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have a 103 mph swing speed. I use a 10.5* driver. The calculator showed me having a 253 yd carry plus roll, and a 12.5* had 254 yds. I play in Texas where there is usually a good wind to play against, and hard fairways to run the ball down, so I'll take the 10.5 all day long over the 12.5.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a load of crap! It's telling to hit a 12 degree driver! I hit a 8.5 now and I'm a fairly high ball hitter. I would be hitting moon shots with a 12 degree!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a load of crap! It's telling to hit a 12 degree driver! I hit a 8.5 now and I'm a fairly high ball hitter. I would be hitting moon shots with a 12 degree!

+1, i agree. Seems to me like the website is driven by a basic kinematic equation for projectile motion, not taking into account the angle of attack of the club in the overall "loft" equation.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

+1, i agree. Seems to me like the website is driven by a basic kinematic equation for projectile motion, not taking into account the angle of attack of the club in the overall "loft" equation.

Holy crap, could you say that in English!! Ha! Lol!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Holy crap, could you say that in English!! Ha! Lol!

Sure. Projectile motion is driven by x and y equations. The angle of launch can be split into x and y velocities, where the velocity in the y direction is fighting against gravity (determines max height, time) and the x velocity determines how far something travels given time (t), as derived by the vertical motion equation.

The website doesn't differentiate between angle of attack, loft and speed. Setting up a goofy spreadsheet like that based on the angle of the initial velocity is easy, and I'd bet the nerd that created it confused "loft" for launch angle in completing his c/s capstone or something.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure. Projectile motion is driven by x and y equations. The angle of launch can be split into x and y velocities, where the velocity in the y direction is fighting against gravity (determines max height, time) and the x velocity determines how far something travels given time (t), as derived by the vertical motion equation.

Now I know why I hated Math in High School!!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The physics behind the golf ball is more than just projectile motion. The materials on the face of the club, the characteristics of the golf ball, how those interact, were on the clubface, moments of inertia, friction, wind resistance, direct of wind, spin, its just nuts. The best thing i found was an excel file, if you google, Golfball.xls it should come up. What it will do is a 4th level iteration with a specific equation to calculate the trajectory and carry. I think its pretty accurate, but it doesn't take into consideration any side spin at all.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The physics behind the golf ball is more than just projectile motion. The materials on the face of the club, the characteristics of the golf ball, how those interact, were on the clubface, moments of inertia, friction, wind resistance, direct of wind, spin, its just nuts. The best thing i found was an excel file, if you google, Golfball.xls it should come up. What it will do is a 4th level iteration with a specific equation to calculate the trajectory and carry. I think its pretty accurate, but it doesn't take into consideration any side spin at all.

Right, it's much more than projectile motion. If you read my posts, you'd gather that. My point was that the website referenced above fails to acknowledge any element other than loft. Discussing MOI, smash factor, friction, spin, etc would be trivial to the point this thread, which is replying to said loft calculator.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • My Swing (PumaAttack)
      I have been working with an Evolvr coach for a while and he has not addressed those concerns at a2 and in fact called my position a perfect example and something he would show to other students.  So your instructions do not match up for me.   It is frustrating to hear you make comments like that when they don't match up with what my coach says.   I still don't get why it matters if it goes from shallow to slightly steeper on the downswing.   Look at Furyks swing, is he hitting all the key positions?  If I hit A5 to A6 why does A3 matter anymore? If Robert Rock had the same angle at 5 as he does at 3 he would miss the ball too..  What is the difference in steep to shallow?  OR shallow to steep, but still outside the ball?  
    • Anyone Else Use 'Good Shots' to Measure How Good a Round Was?
      No because it's pretty rare I hit a really good shot. Many are happy accidents. Good is relative to par for me. If I gave myself a chance it's a decent shot. But most don't end up as I conceived it in my mind and I know that in my planning that it's a big target. I think in certain areas, miss right to get up and down if I know going for the green brings trouble into play. If it ends up right of the green and leaves me a pitch uphill it's good whether I hit it to my number for that club or chunk it 15 yards short.
    • My Swing (PumaAttack)
      @pumaAttack I didn't tell you to "model" your swing after Ko's, I was giving you an example of someone that is doing the opposite of what you're doing. Face looking "down" at 2, standing the shaft up at 3, this will make the shallowing move a lot more natural.  Exactly, you have to consider the entire motion. When the swing goes "shallow to steep" consistency is going to be hard to achieve because of the compensations you have to make with the sweetspot. Yes at 6 you may be pointing the shaft outside the ball but it's also steeper than you were at 3, these things matter. If you had the same shaft alignment at 5 that you do at 3 you'd miss the ball, so you in order to make contact you have to steepen the shaft. While the shaft is still outside the ball at 5 the sweetspot is going to move differently than if you were "steep to shallow". @pumaAttack I wasn't aware that you were still on Evolvr or that they had already made recommendations, I'm sure your instructor has mentioned the backswing and that it's part of their gameplan to address it. I was just trying to help, you mentioned you are trying to shallow the shaft on the downswing, I saw where you were on the downswing so I figured I'd post.
    • My Swing (Jeremie Boop)
      Forgot to post my DTL video. Nothing new here really unfortunately. Main positive is I'm still doing a pretty decent job of keeping from cupping my left wrist on the backswing because it's pretty flat at the top. That's nice to see since it's something I struggled with for a long time. Thing is I've no clue what I did to fix that.  
    • What'd You Shoot Today?
      Played well at Washtenaw Golf Club (formally Polo Fields - Washtenaw).  Short game was spot on and posted a 6.9 differential.  No birdies, lots of pars, a few bogies and a disaster on the short par 3 #12 where I had a double par 6.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bigtosh90
      bigtosh90
      (26 years old)
    2. dopplegvnger
      dopplegvnger
      (24 years old)
    3. Frank62
      Frank62
      (54 years old)
  • Blog Entries