Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
No1CeltsFan

What wedges should a beginner have in his bag?

64 posts in this topic

I keep reading conflicting articles online about beginners and the wedges they should have in their bag. My questions really is should I have a lob and or gap wedge in the bag?

Most articles agree that the Gap Wedge doesn't need to be in the bag, but the Lob Wedge is kind of 50/50.

Hoping some of you guys can help me out better with why or why not I should buy 1 of the 2.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I think you should go with a lob wedge (60-57), and a sand wedge/gap wedge (56-52). Right now I don't think you will need anything more than this, because more wedges are for specialty shots. Also, if you are unsure of what wedges to buy, I suggest Titleist or I heard the Scratch wedges are good. Btw, I use a 58 and 52 degree wedge. Hope this helps.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks

I got my eye on and Adams Tight Lies IDEA A1 Lob Wedge for like 20-30$ on EBay. I got the SW and I like it. Just not 100% sure yet. Hopefully I get a few more opinions.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I only have a Pw and 56*

My last few rounds have all been two or three strokes on either side of 90
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

love my 60* but for many mid-high handicappers they say it is difficult to control. I think it is like anything else (all in your head). If you are comfortable and confident with the club it will likely perform well.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep reading conflicting articles online about beginners and the wedges they should have in their bag. My questions really is should I have a lob and or gap wedge in the bag?

If you're a beginner, there's a good chance the set you're playing has an AW option. My suggestion is to extend your irons down to there, and then include a 56°. I'm pretty sure the R9s you're looking at have this as an option; get 3-A instead of 3-P.

The LW? No. I had one as a beginner, and spent a lot of time practicing with it for no gain. AW? Absolutely. It's essentially an 11-iron at this point. You can get more wedgie when you are more proficient.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A lob wedge is the last club a beginner needs to add to their bag. If you need to fill in a spot I'd go with a gap wedge-depending on what your "gap" is between your PW and SW.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're a beginner, there's a good chance the set you're playing has an AW option. My suggestion is to extend your irons down to there, and then include a 56°. I'm pretty sure the R9s you're looking at have this as an option; get 3-A instead of 3-P.

Looks like Shindig beat me to it. This post is right on point.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been wondering about this as well, and since I can't figure out the exact loft (of course, without having it measured) of the PW in my 855 (not the silver scot) set, I only have that plus a 55* in my bag. Not quite sure if I want to replace the old 55*, or what I'd go with in terms of club in general, as well as loft. Any suggestions?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're a beginner, there's a good chance the set you're playing has an AW option. My suggestion is to extend your irons down to there, and then include a 56°. I'm pretty sure the R9s you're looking at have this as an option; get 3-A instead of 3-P.

I'm almost embarrassed to ask... but what exactly is the AW? I've googled it not 2 days ago to no avail. Thanks
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i only have a pw and 56
i wish i went with the 54 / 58 combo instead cause i find i'm in the 54 range a lot more
ohw ell i'll adjust
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also might just upgrade my PW. The PW I got now is old. How old? Not sure I got it from a friend for free. I know it's not that good quality at all. I like the PW in general as a club to hit, so upgrading to a better one just might be the best option I have right now until I figure out which of the LW, GW and AW suits my game best.

I smell a Golfer's Warehouse trip coming up in the next few days to try a few of each.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO, all a beginner needs is a 52 and a 56*. Unless you are a highly skilled player, chances are you cant hit a 58* or 60* consistently anyways...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for all these answers guys. I'm glad I stumbled across this forum. I mean it's phenomonal. Much better to get back and forth between members, compared to reading an article and not being able to ask questions.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Attack or Approach wedge. I think it's another term for gap wedge, fits in between SW and PW.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Attack or Approach wedge. I think it's another term for gap wedge, fits in between SW and PW.

i dont think it's the same as a Gap, because in Tiger Wood Golf 2010 it's a completely seperate club. I'm 99% sure in the game it goes AW, LW, SW, GW, PW

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These are decisions I faced recently.

If you're a beginner, there's a good chance the set you're playing has an AW option. My suggestion is to extend your irons down to there, and then include a 56°. I'm pretty sure the R9s you're looking at have this as an option; get 3-A instead of 3-P.

This is pretty spot-on. I got a GW and a LW. The GW comes out on almost every hole, the LW stays in the bag awaiting specialty shots a couple times a round.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Scientific Studies
      Oh, good Lord! I can't believe that you entered such a completely off the mark reply! I thought you had some smarts. Valuable eyeballs? There are no such things! There are only eyeballs. Advertising rates are established on "number of impressions", in other words the number of people who see your ad. The only "value" established for those "eyeballs" is what age they are, what demographic they belong to. If you're seeking to market to a particular demographic, you might pay more to place an ad on "this" show rather than "that" show. And who said anything about "left and right"? You did! You used the phrase "industry supported research", which is a code phrase of the left to indicate research that is suspect! When have you ever heard "Entertainment Industry supported research", or "Actor supported research" in reply! And please don't try to tell me that government sponsored research is as pure as the wind driven snow. I've just realized that you may be confining your remarks to the field of physics. In that realm, they might be valid. Besides you, me, and a couple of guys behind the tree, who the hell cares? I'm referring more to "agendized" science, like climatology, nutrition, and prescription drugs. As for blind funding, that doesn't mean throwing money at any bunch of yahoos who cook up some hare brained scheme. All it means is that the people who are doing the research don't know where the money is.coming from. So they don't know who is buttering their bread! Let's face it, scientists are people, and they need to make a living. There was a line from "The Big Bang Theory" that, while fictional, makes real world sense. In one episode another physicist, Barry Kripke, is asked why he's still studying string theory. He says, "Hey, I study a theory that can't be proven, I apply for grants, and I spend the money on booze and broads!"
    • "Swing Machine Golf" by Paul Wilson
      I will apologize in advance if this post winds up being long. I went out for my first round of golf in 2015, shot a 110, went home, put my clubs on Craigslist, sold them within a day and decided to quit the game. I had been playing for 25 years but only felt I was getting worse. Then, while planning a summer trip to Las Vegas I stumbled upon Paul Wilson's golf videos. I watched a few and couldn't believe how simple he made the golf swing look. I picked up an extra driver from my garage, started trying to swing free and easy and went to the range 2-3 times a week to see if this method would really work. My first time out I shot 97. The second was a 92. The next was an 85. Then, I booked a pair of lessons with Wilson during my vacation. Long story short, Paul Wilson's teaching methods kept me from quitting the game. My handicap is down to an 11, and I am scheduled for two more lessons with him in July so I can confirm somebody who reads this forum is a Wilson disciple. While he can get pretty technical when describing his approach for me it's pretty simple - turn to the top, start the downswing with the lower body and let my arms swing loosely. I expect to break 80 for the first time in my life by the end of the year.               One more thing, which has been noted previously in this thread - if I get off track I immediately go to YouTube, que up a couple of Paul's videos and know exactly what I'm doing wrong. His web site is an incredible resource for me, and I assume it's the same for many others.
    • Muirfield Out of Open Rota, Denies Women Membership
      I was under the impression that Cypress Point had been removed from the "Crosby Clambake" simply because the membership at that course didn't like the idea of the general public trampling on their hallowed turf.  Part of that reasoning might be based simply upon the notion of exclusivity and status; on the other hand, the environment around the course is somewhat fragile and having thousands of golf fans moving around that delicate seaside plant life and sand dunes would not be good for it. You can't tell me that most of the pros who play in the AT&T ProAm don't try and pull whatever strings they have at their disposal to play a round at Cypress during the weekend or weekdays before the AT&T event given the spectacular design and the chance to play a relatively well-preserved MacKenzie design. So even now that Cypress Point has female members I don't believe we can expect that we will ever see it on the AT&T course rota again.
    • Carry-on one Driver golf club in airplane? US and to Eurpoe?
      Thanks, Iacas. I will carry on one Driver with me without  any packaging.  I will have to pass through security check and X-ray scanning. By the way, my flight will be from Toronto Pearson airport to EU, so I hope Canada will have the same regulation as US since they are part of NA (North America). I will let you know if I will get into any trouble.  (I will not do practice swing inside the plane, but I may try while I wait around boarding area. ) Thanks!      
    • 2016 Mets World Championship Thread
      This kind of makes me laugh. I heard the Cleveland Indians GM interviewed on radio before a series with KC. Turns out he's a big friend of the Royals GM. He said the Royals Gm told him that his players were joking with him about how full of themselves the NY media was. They would ask the Royals players "Have you ever seen a pitching staff like the Mets?" The Royals players would answer, "Yes! Every time we play the Indians, Tigers, White Sox, or Twins! We're used to seeing good pitching!"
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries