• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
mrbillinoc

Longest hitting driver?

13 posts in this topic

Question...With the good 'ol "Iron Byron", the robot they test clubs with that repeats every swing EXACTLY...wouldn't it be easy to figure out which driver really gives us more distance?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Question...With the good 'ol "Iron Byron", the robot they test clubs with that repeats every swing EXACTLY...wouldn't it be easy to figure out which driver really gives us more distance?

It wouldn't be as easy as you think. Although you would be able to tell what driver gives the longest distance for the robot, it doesn't have a perfect swing. As a result, everyone would benefit from the combination of a different driver, loft and shaft combination. I don't have the same swingspeed as you and my swing is probably very different so the longest driver on the "robot" test could work perfectly for you but spray the ball all over the course for me.

The solution to finding the longest hitting driver is to get fit, then you'll find the best one for YOUR game.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no because its not just the driver head that gives EVERYONE the most distasnce.

Its a combination of driver head, shaft, and YOUR swing. Meaning, one person's best distance driver can be the next person's worst.

aka, the robot can test out 500 drivers and find the one best distance driver... which could very well be the worst distance driver for me, since I have a different swing than the robot.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tests show that skilled golfers can sometimes hit a club better than Iron Byron - the golfer can make adjustments to stance and grip to correct for oddities of a given club.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just install a 50" shaft on your driver, I hear it's what TM will be doing next year =P
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As others have said, yes and no. Because distance is a result of clubhead speed, spin and tracjectory, different heads and shafts will yield different distances per player. It may be possible to estimate which head produces the most ball speed, all things being equal, but a players distance is largely a result of proper head and shaft selection.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Longest would be whatever Jamie is swinging!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just install a 50" shaft on your driver, I hear it's what TM will be doing next year =P

I thinking you mean 52 inch. But your in the right direction! Then taylormade will also being out new drivers every 3 weeks that will add another inch. :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a well known fact the universal longest hitting driver is... whichever one Tiger Woods has been paid to advertise this year.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, the new TM will feature a telescoping shaft that allows you to adjust the shaft from 40" up to 60". ;)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's a well known fact the universal longest hitting driver is... whichever one Tiger Woods has been paid to advertise this year.

Firstly, Tiger is not even long compared to the Bubbas and Justins and JBs hitting stupid drives recently. I think even Phil can consistently outdrive Tiger at this point. Secondly, even if Tiger can get all of it, it's likely nowhere near the fairway. So Tiger is not a advertising his Nike drivers very well as of late.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, Tiger is not even long compared to the Bubbas and Justins and JBs hitting stupid drives recently. I think even Phil can consistently outdrive Tiger at this point. Secondly, even if Tiger can get all of it, it's likely nowhere near the fairway. So Tiger is not a advertising his Nike drivers very well as of late.

i may be wrong but i think he was joking.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only variable factor is the individuals swing. Head, shaft, ball and swing speed (e.g. 80,90,100,110) can all be isolated and tested, right? Possibly can include transition tempo to test shaft flex and kick points.

So, we could produce a series of data points for these items and get a fairly accurate idea of which driver is longest or is the swing that big a factor that it will throw doubt on the entire "study"?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Question on Twitter: Easiest Way to Shoot Lower Scores in a Week
      Something that would probably save most golfers a couple of strokes without any extra effort would be aiming at the center of the green on approach shots. Best bang for your buck practice wise would be short game practice. 
    • How long should my ball test be?
      Just wanted some thoughts on how long I should test each ball Im considerring. What is a good sample size. 9 holes, 18 or even longer?
    • Question on Twitter: Easiest Way to Shoot Lower Scores in a Week
      What I have learned as I have improved and keep reading about in Bob Rotella's books is that the best way to shoot the score of your life is to focus on practicing the short game, but mostly developing confidence in your putting. Since most of our strokes consist of the short game, by getting just a percentage better there it will translate to more overall success than anywhere else.
    • No Forearm Rotation - Biggest Swing Flaw?
      @Golfer2223 what does forearm rotation have to do with the shoulders?-They are not connected. Forearms can rotate regardless of what the shoulders are doing.
    • No Forearm Rotation - Biggest Swing Flaw?
      Correct. For example: He also says that the forearms rotate during the backswing. Which we know that they do, and quite a bit. How much is too much? On the left, below in both images, is his depiction of zero rotation: On the right, in both images, he demonstrates nearly 90° of turning at the wrist. based on what I know, little of this comes from the upper arm - the majority of it comes from the forearm. Do you disagree with any of that, @Golfer2223? Notice one thing, then, too please. On the left, the plane of the left wrist is pretty much parallel to the sagittal plane. On the right images, it's perpendicular to it. What do we find at the top of the backswing of the game's best players? The issue now appears to be simply trying to determine what in the world you mean by the bold above, particularly because there's really nothing "natural" about the golf swing. What feels natural to you, or seems natural to you, is definitely not natural to all or possibly even the majority of golfers. in my experience I've learned that you can't really talk about the golf swing in terms of what's "natural" or not. The truth of the matter is that for golfers who do this the right amount "naturally" then it simply isn't something we talk about in a lesson. For golfers who do it an improper amount, it may or may not be their priority. Here's a wrist graph from AMM for a very, very good golfer. Note that the wrist (blue line, top left) starts with 50° of supination. It pronates, relative to the upper arm, to a position of 16° pronation at the top. That's a pronation from 50° on one side of the zero mark to 16° on the other side - a pronation of 66°. This doesn't even account for how much the upper arm rotates - the forearm has rotated 66° from the setup position. (Note that above when I said 25° or 32°, that was relative to totally neutral, not to the setup position. The forearms rotated quite a bit more than the 25-32° cited, because they started somewhat supinated.) This graph and these numbers are not unusual. Look, @Golfer2223, it's somewhat incumbent upon you to be clear in what you're saying. It's far from ideal to say things like how you expect to see "zero forearm rotation" (or whatever) but then to claim that it's "relative to the natural shoulder motion" (obviously both paraphrased). Nobody has a clue what you mean by the "natural shoulder" whatever, and many would disagree that anything in this topic area is "natural" to begin with. So, please clarify what you're saying, and be precise and use specific words, or at least define them, provide examples, or both.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries