• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
andy-golf

how to get height on my 3 wood

17 posts in this topic

i have been playing golf for six months.i am playing weell with most club bu i cant get any hight on my 3 wood

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

The easy way to get more hight is to hit down on the ball and not sweep it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but when i do that i start to hit the ball fat

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you tried to move it back in your stance?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Try to have your hands leading the shaft when you hit the ball.  The club head should descend into impact and hit ball then turf.  If you hit the turf first your hands are behind the shaft and you need to go back to hands leading.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My stock 3 wood shot off the fairway has the ball a little forward in my stance and taking an aggressive swing. The key for me is making sure the takeway is slow and smooth. Then at the top I have a very slight pause and after that I don't make any conscious moves but I'm basically in rip mode at that point. When I hit it solid I feel the impact in my fingers as the club head releases. I'm much more a sweeper with my woods so height generally isn't a problem provided I have the club head accelerating through impact.

I see a number of tour pros take what looks like a small divot with their fairway woods. It looks like a slight descending blow but I'm not sure what that's all about. They are tour pros, there is nothing they do that isn't a freak of nature.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can appreciate all the comments above about ball position, swing technique, divots, etc, but I had the same problem, I couldn't get a 3 wood in the air consistantly.  I consider myself a decent golfer, but I hated this club.  I'd hit maybe 20% the way I wanted to.  So, I practiced and practiced and hit 100's and 100's of balls at the range......I still hated that d*mn club.  So I called a professional club fitter.  After a week or 2 of going back and forth, by email and telephone calls I had him make a 3 wood for me.  After about 10 minutes on the range I was laughing at the distance and how easy this thing was to hit.  I can hit it high, low, left, right, wow.....its totally funny as h*ll.   I've gotten to the point that I can hit the 3 wood 260 yards off the turf.   My regular distance when I started with this club was about 230-235.  I've never owned a club this easy to hit.

Its such a great club that I'm expecting my 5 wood and 7 wood from him today!!

He made this club, as well as my 5 and 7 woods, +1", Grafalloy ProLite Fairway stiff shaft (low kick), over size grip.  All my irons are +1" but are regular flex.  My drivers and woods are all +1" stiff flex.

Try a different shaft, not neccessarily a new head ( though I did change club heads too), but the shaft may be all wrong for your swing.....mine was...but it ain't no more....I love it!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by golfyboy4

The easy way to get more hight is to hit down on the ball and not sweep it.



Is this actually true? I'm surprised if it isn't that Iacas hasn't had a thread about it. :) I feel like the more down I hit the lower the ball goes. It seems like as you increase the amount of swinging down you decrease the amount of loft on the club. (Think hands way in front of the ball) I also watched a video on youtube where the commentators showed in slow mo how (baddley maybe) hit the ball so low off the tee by hitting down on the ball.

I also find that when I hit the ball as level as possible with my wedges I get the highest ball flight and the most spin. So whats the deal?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kinda starnge ha?

The term "hitting down on the ball", I believe, is all relative.  You really can't tell someone to hit down more to get the ball to go higher unless you see their swing and setup and know that they aren't hitting down already and there is something else wrong.  Just telling someone to hit down more to get the ball to go up is misleading.

For example:  If you move the ball back off your right toe, with an 8 iron, you are forced to hit down on the ball and trust me....it ain't going up, its coming out low and long, just like I planned it.  So if someone tells me from this position to get the ball to go higher I have to hit more down.....ouch....this is gonna be bad and ugly.

For some people, with their swing  and the club they are using, say a 5 iron, they can take the advice of hitting down more and the ball can go up.  Most people that can't hit a 5 iron because they aren't "pinching" the ball and taking a divot with the 5 and they are trying to actually hit up on it, which we all know does not work.  So in this case, the advice of hitting down may be appropriate.  If you, like me, hit hands in front with a W the ball stays normal launch.  If I sweep that ball, its gonna spin, go high, and short.  but this also depends on my body position at impact, thus making the ball go longer then normal : (

So.....what I'm getting at is what I said earlier.....its all relative and it all depends!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the vast majority of golfers having trouble getting the ball into the air "hitting down" is pretty good advice.  They're very often swinging up or flipping.  They are only very basic, basic tips, but "hit down" and "ball first" are truisms for a reason.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys will take on that advice.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also i am having trouble marking my card in points coould use tell me how this works

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by andy-golf

Also i am having trouble marking my card in points coould use tell me how this works



What do you mean points? Like the Stableford system?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

According to Wikipedia:

Points Strokes taken in relation to adjusted fixed score
0 2 strokes or more over, or no score recorded
1 1 stroke over
2 Same number of strokes
3 1 stroke under
4 2 strokes under
5 3 strokes under
6 4 strokes under

"Adjusted fixed score" is par.

They used to play with a Stableford system in the International, a PGA Tour tournament, but it was scored with an adjusted scoring system:

Points Strokes taken in relation to par
+8 points Albatross (3 strokes under par)
+5 points Eagle (2 strokes under par)
+2 points Birdie (1 stroke under par)
0 points Par
−1 point Bogey (1 stroke over par)
−3 points Double bogey or worse (2 strokes or more over par)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

also im having trouble figuring out why this thread is in Tour Talk can some one help? thx

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by Williamevanl

Is this actually true? I'm surprised if it isn't that Iacas hasn't had a thread about it. :) I feel like the more down I hit the lower the ball goes. It seems like as you increase the amount of swinging down you decrease the amount of loft on the club. (Think hands way in front of the ball) I also watched a video on youtube where the commentators showed in slow mo how (baddley maybe) hit the ball so low off the tee by hitting down on the ball.

I also find that when I hit the ball as level as possible with my wedges I get the highest ball flight and the most spin. So whats the deal?



You don't want to hit down on the ball, you sweep the ball off the fairway with fairway woods. The one thing you need to do is make sure you get of your weight to your left side and not to hang back on your right. The club will be on a downward path "hands leading" towards the ball do to lag and maintaining your right wrist angle pressure.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • The Films and Movies Thread
      A little late finding this - X-Men, Days of Future Past Quicksilver scene in realtime.   
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I'd be curious to see just what Jack said. I think "10 or 15" having a chance to win for typical PGA Tour events in any era is an exaggeration of the relative weakness of the fields. Even before there was a depth of talent in the U.S. and the 'golf craze' here took off, the money drew top level golfers from overseas who were following the better money available here in tournaments and pro positions. I accept there's been a general strengthening of fields as the expansion in prize money and the total population of competitive golfers (see chart below) have forced top golfers to have more preparation and polish, but I don't think there's really ever been a lack of generally elite level competition on the PGA tour or at the Majors since about the 20's or 30's. I think if the effect of a tiny number of truly top level competitors taking on a bunch of club pro relative 'dubs' was as strong as you seem to think that most of the top multiple Major winners would be golfers from the early days of the tour. But to me it looks pretty balanced across eras. I'll see if I can work up some actual numbers. By the 1920s there were likely about 1.5 million golfers (in the U.S. alone), which is a pretty healthy base from which to draw potential 'top talent'. Total participation in golf from when Jack started to when Tiger started roughly tripled. As far as rating 'achievement' you play in the era you play with the existing disadvantages and advantages. IMO, if Jack had grown up as a contemporary of Tiger with the same advantages of technology and swing instruction / coaching and the same disadvantages of a greater number of potential competitors that they would both have risen to elite levels and would have regularly been battling for Amateur and Major Championships. I don't think the potential ranges of human abilities / talent really change much in a few generations. Would I consider Tiger more competitively vetted, yes. Do I think that means his talent level and achievements were automatically greater than Jack's? No. I could see valuing Tiger's win total more than Jack's (and certainly Snead's with some 'iffy' events in the total) because of the relative talent base depth, but not sure that transfers as readily to the performance in Majors, particularly the Opens. I think it would have been amazing and exciting to be able to see them compete at their peaks rather than a boring foregone conclusion.  
    • 2016 Waste Management Phoenix Open Discussion
      I really like Hideki's takeaway... Nice smooth swing.
    • 2016 Waste Management Phoenix Open Discussion
      Fowler is one the fastest on tour, anyone is going to look slower than usual playing alongside him.
    • AMA Thread (@iacas)
      I mowed lawns when I was a kid. I don't think that quite counts. I delivered local "coupon newspapers" (the "Greensheets") when I was also a kid. That sucked, but I was paid something like nine cents per paper delivered. I hated it though. They weighed a lot, and I had to pick them up every Friday and deliver them for a few hours every Saturday morning. Year-round. I washed cars for a month (on weekends) at a local car dealership. I got to drive a Dodge Viper around the block. They didn't care that I was 15 and didn't have my driver's license yet… Yeah, I still don't know what they were thinking on that one. I had my learner's permit, but… so what? I was driving cars from the lot into the street and down to the washing bay half a block away, and then back up to the lot. I worked at the Erie Zoo (which ran the ice rink next door during the winter) for about a full year. I often ran the carousel. I still hate certain songs, particularly the ones we played during the annual Zoo Boo. "I put a spell on you…" makes me irrationally angry.  (Not really, but I still hate hearing the song.) That was an actual job, with a W2 or a W9 or whatever stuff you fill out. Concessions and rides and whatnot at the Erie Zoo. I'd like to think I was a good employee. I once even got a speeding ticket (the cops loved to sit, I'd later discover, at the base of a very large hill near the zoo) and still made it to work and punched in before my start time.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. onthehunt526
      onthehunt526
      (29 years old)
  • Blog Entries