Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Newcomer

Has anyone tried these Taylormade clones?

41 posts in this topic

TurboPower Ti11 Driver (TaylorMade R11 clone)

TurboPower Ti11 Woods (TaylorMade R11 Fairway clones)

TurboPower Ti11 Hybrids (TaylorMade Rescue clones)

TurboPower Fire 3.0 irons (Taylormade Burner 2.0 iron clones)

Heater 3.0 white Irons (TaylorMade Burner 2.0 iron clones)

Just wanted to say that I'm somewhat of a beginner. I have a set of old, second hand, worn out mixed bag clubs right now, but I'd like to upgrade to something better. After doing some searching and comparing, the Taylormade R11, and Burner 2.0 irons have certainly caught my interest. But with TaylorMade prices so high, I'm gearing toward these clones as my first real set of clubs.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

as a beginner i played with clones because i couldn't tell the difference between good and bad clubs. for the price i was a fan. i am sure lots of guys here would disagree but that is just my opinion.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by Newcomer

. . .  I'm gearing toward these clones as my first real set of clubs.


A bag of clones would be real clubs compared to your current clubs? How bad are they?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by sean_miller

A bag of clones would be real clubs compared to your current clubs? How bad are they?

Well... If I had to guess, I'd say they are over 20 years old (some of the irons are Northwestern Tom Shaw Autograph if that says anything, lol).

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZEUS

as a beginner i played with clones because i couldn't tell the difference between good and bad clubs. for the price i was a fan. i am sure lots of guys here would disagree but that is just my opinion.


Thank you for your input... I Just don't want to go out and spend over $500 for a complete set of clubs right now... I'm just getting into taking the game seriously and I can always upgrade my clubs as I progress.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your replies. I'm kind of looking at a different set now... Adams Tight Lie Plus clubs.--- http://www.adamsgolf.com/products/irons/tightlies1014_plus_set.php (But in Blue --- http://www.worldwidegolfshops.com/mm5/graphics/00000011/adams-tightliesplus-premium-set-xl.jpg )

I posted a new topic on them trying to get opinions and reviews on them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

think about the amount of money you are going to spend on clones. if you are serious about golf you will want a new set in a year and a half probably. why not spend the money now to get a good set that you probably will be spending in a year and a half anyway. you dont need high end equipment to get good at all, but i think there are 3 turns you can make...2 good one bad. the 2 good being used clubs, or new low end clubs from a reputable company. one bad turn would be "clones" like these. The pinemeadow are very nice, but what your looking at is no where near that in my opinion. The adams set you posted would be a perfect starter set. goodluck.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a word of advice.  I was in the same boat as you at the beginning of last season, in fact, I have a post on here regarding clones that got a crap load of input from people.  I purchased a set of clone Ping G10 irons for under $200 bucks and 3 weeks later I found a real G10 set on craigslist that was barely used for $250.  So, I actually spent more money than I initially wanted to.  I say that, to say this.... go ahead and browse the market for a lightly used set of quality clubs for your first set and save yourself the second guessing that WILL come when you buy clones, depsite how the club functions.  I still believe clones are "good enough" clubs, but I must admit that the real thing does feel/fly a bit better (could be mental though).

Heck, I'm thinking about selling my Pings now and getting AP2s.  Good thing is, I will be able to get all of my money back for my Pings, maybe even make a little.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m new here but not new to club making. There is no one answer to if clones are as good as the brand names or not.

Historically when forged irons were the benchmark of quality clubs it was all in the quality of the steel and the makers ability to match the right shaft to achive best swing weight and lie for the individual player. When investment castings for irons and wood heads came in to vogue is when it became practical for cones to compete with major brands.

The reason for this is that almost none of the major brands actually cast their heads. The major brands will design the head then turn the proof over to a foundry to produce the raw casting. This has lead to a lot of copies made by the foundries with lesser grade casting materials and sold to the clone market for a fraction of the price they are paid by the brand name club companies. Typically the major brands will trademark and or paten the major features to prevent copping of proprietary designs. However one single small change in the features of the irons overall design can keep a cone company outside the patens restrictions.

There are very good clones, there are cones that actually better playing clubs for a given section of the market and then there are really bad clones. In this day and age most clones in the ½ off the brand name price range tend to be pretty good clubs over all. The ones that are in the 1/3rd of brand name price range are hit and miss and the ones less than 1/3 rd the price tend to be crap. Back in the day when the majority of Golfsmith’s business was cloning clubs they set the standard for quality clones by engineering their clones honestly compete with the major brands. However they saw the ever changing technology revolution coming and got out of the clone market for the most part while the getting was good.

All this said you can take a top quality clone set of irons and with detailed attention to weighting and fitting you can make a set of irons worthy of praise. But that is the real key that most Sunday golfers forget. Even the brand name manufactures build clubs built for a 5’11”, 190lb player with ground to wrist distance of 35”-35 ½” and a swing speed with a driver of 80-90mph. So if you don’t fit very closely in this niche then the clubs regardless if clone of major brand don’t really fit you ideally. One of the biggest issues I see in regards to mid to high handicap players is shaft flex and shaft length. Everyone wants XS printed on the label of a 46 ½” driver shaft. Even when they are 5’8, 135lb and have 75 mph driver club head speed. Macho will always be macho even at their own expense.

So here is my take. If you want to save some money find a top raked clone you like at about 1/2 the price of a top line major brand. Buy just the heads and then go to your local club maker and have them fit the clubs to you and your swing. You will end up paying about ¼ (or more) less than the cost the major brand names and have a set of clubs that you can swing consistently. What I am saying it is just as important to spend a bit of money to get your clubs fitted to your body and swing speed as it is to buy a good club. Regardless if it is a clone or a brand name.

By the way fitting is something that really needs to be done in person. IMO fitting by internet is an oxymoron.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started playing late in life and I could buy what I thought was the best. I bought Ping I3 irons w/custom fitting, reg.shaft, and Ping 10.5 degree driver. I had been playing cheap clubs. I expected my game to improve. It didn't. The irons had so much draw I had to aim almost off the fairway. I had made a mistake. I sold the clubs at a 50% loss. In the last 15 years I have played only clone clubs. I now "build" my own. The problem with buying clubs is that there is so many factors involved. The most important thing is the shaft. It all depends on your swing. I hit the ball very low with a low draw for irons but fade a driver. For me, I had to go to a very low torque (3,5 or less). shaft to prevent fading my driver. It took me three drivers and four sets of irons to maximize my game. I couldn't afford to buy that many name brand clubs. Now I use a Tour model T11 (Taylormade clone) with a 12 degree loft. I use a 3.5 low torque shaft with a low kick. The best driver shaft for me is a Tour model 63oz,. low kick with 3.5 degree torque. It cost only $29. The head cost $46 at Momark Golf. You don't need to spend a small fortune on clubs to play good golf if you can determine what type of club will work for you I now play T11 Taylormade clone irons.also..
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Newcomer

TurboPower Ti11 Driver (TaylorMade R11 clone)

About a month ago, I saw a guy hitting one of those drivers on our driving range.   The sound at impact was absolutely HORRIBLE.   It sounded like he was hitting balls with a soda can..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I purchased the Ti11 from Monark Golf just as the last comment stated. He is correct. I even joke that I am hitting with a Folger's coffee can on a stick. I hate the sound. With that said, I have never hit a driver longer or straighter. I am 5' 9' tall with a swing speed just a tick under 100. I can consistently drive the ball 290+ with boomers in the 320 range with the right conditions. I joke with my gof buddies about the sound. They say wear earplugs and enjoy the view. Take it for what it is worth.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by poble

with a swing speed just a tick under 100. I can consistently drive the ball 290+ with boomers in the 320 range with the right conditions.

no you dont.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have a 83 MPH and can drive it 400 yards on 18 at Kapalua with a 50 MPH wind at my back. A 100 MPH swing speed might hit it 250 on a level hole with no wind, 290 you're dreaming.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • alternatives inside the well being
      alternatives inside the well being university, launches a manufacturer new digestive and immune Beard Czar  product Probiotic   Viatropin  evaluation Probiotic American American that entails newly realized traces of micro organism worthwhile to more than a few wellness issues. It has a difficult technique to alleviate digestive problems and toughen whole physique wellbeing.An educated health practitioner and wellness advised who studied comfort on the tutoring of California, perfect Biotics is a gut yeast complement that has the capabilities to absorb diet and minerals safely, fight off infections and strengthen healthful digestion," experiences James.When requested involving the selections of excellent Biotics, Dr. Cary outlined, "There are two types of micro organism decided all through the digestive tract, hazardous micro organism and worthy micro organism.  http://drozforskolin.org/beard-czar-reviews/
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      Here's some more below about the lowest you might expect - even on an easy course. I think this is largely true, but pros don't tend to play a lot on 'easy' courses so there doesn't seem to be even much anecdotal stuff. The quote below describes what's considered the 'perfect round'. I guess you could also consider a 'go-for-green' perfect round where you also hit all the par 5's in two and one-putted those for eagle for a 'go-for-green perfect' score of 50. Obviously the likelihood of doing this in a single round defies the essence of golf, but it's a good a hard theoretical lower limit that probably depends more on the par than the course rating. Likely the odds grow exponentially as the percentage of birdied / eagled holes rises. I think we can discount albatrosses as a 'perfect round' option. Most tournament pro scores don't get below 56 and 59 with about an 80/20 rule separating the more frequent 59s from the 58's. That's 4-5 strokes (assuming par 72) over the 'perfect round' and 8-9 over the 'go-for-green perfect round', each of which represent grabbing about 75% and 61% respectively of the potential shots under par realistically available. I suppose a short par-4 would add another potential eagle opportunity, but we'll discount that as I'm not sure how universal they are. The lowest tournament round was 55 (par of 71) by one single golfer out of how many total tournament rounds by pros and plus HCP amateurs over the years? So while 55 is humanly achievable it's super rare and likely represents the lower limit of any possible likelihood. That would put the absolute lowest threshold around 17.8 below the course rating (72.8) and 16 below par. So there's a lot of room to go below even a low course rating or par of 70. I don't think the expected scores would get too squished and the distribution would still likely be normal in shape. The thing that is probably unrealistic is how narrow the range of expected scores is. The field is extremely consistent, but I think a single individual player (whose average score is the same as the field) will have a score variance significantly larger than the field. I think the mode likely stays the same while the distribution flattens / spreads out more into the tails with a little more probability to both go low and high and less certainty of shooting within a stroke or two of the mode / most likely score.  
    • Difference in These Putters Besides Price?
      My mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts! Someone beat me to it, but there are obvious differences in the appearance of those two putters. The most obvious is that the alignment marks don't align! And the mark on the instep (if that's what it's called), looks like it was hacked in with a machete or maybe a cold chisel. Never mind that it looked like it laid in a barn for 10 years! Hey, I'm a senior and retired, so I'm always on the lookout for a bargain, but I refuse to buy cheap crap just because it's cheap. I remember a radio show I heard years ago where the discussion was about value vs cost. A woman called in and said she didn't have a lot of money, so she couldn't afford to buy "cheap". The host asked her what she meant. She replied that buying cheap stuff that does not perform and wears out early is more expensive in the long run than buying top quality goods that do the job and will last! Admittedly, they weren't talking golf equipment here, but the idea is the same.
    • Graduate School Study. Please fill out this 5 minute survey.
      Please take 5 minutes out of your day and complete this survey for our research paper.  Thank you very much! https://usfca.co1.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_5pRgiaKHZleaZjT
    • http://www.athleticgreensfacts.com/lift-x/
      Therefore, use a nurturing day cream to which at least a Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 15 has been added. If you spend the day out in the sun, use a sunscreen with at least SPF 30. Anti if you have oily skin, it is wise to opt for oil-free sunscreen creams. Sensitive lift x  skin: do's and don'ts in skincare Uiterlijk8 April 2016 sensitive skin: Do's and Don'ts Sensitive skin often needs additional attention. However, a wrong approach can be harmful to your skin, leaving your delicate skin exacerbates rather than reduces. http://www.athleticgreensfacts.com/lift-x/
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries