• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ipark1303

Amateur status and Tour Pro winnings: what happens to the money prize?

17 posts in this topic

I was following Tadd Fujikawa and I got curious on this issue....

On CNNSI.com, they say: "Had he been a pro, the finish would have been worth about $56,000."

Any suggestions on where the money goes?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I believe he is skipped over when they are figuring the winnings.. If he finished 21st, then the professional who finished 22nd gets the 21st place money and down the line just like that. He is ignored in the prize winnings.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is skipped as far as official money goes, like he wasn't there. I am sure though he was given a nice fat gift certificate in the pro shop. Mind you the GC still can't be more than $700.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Sorry my ignorance....

so, let's suppose an amateur wins a major..... he does not get anything from the 1-million and plus 1st prize????

isn't it like you win the lottery and they tell you, sorry you cannot cash the money because you are a student??!?!?!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry my ignorance....

Again unless you have declared yourself a professional (which by the way is really easy, just say hey I am a pro now) then you are ineligible for any cash prize on the PGA tour. The catch is you must declare yourself a pro or amateur BEFORE the event. So regardless of the place you take in a tournament an amateur cannot receive any money.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

If he had declared himself pro before the event chances are the sponser would not have given him the spot.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he had declared himself pro before the event chances are the sponser would not have given him the spot.

He got in by monday qualifying I believe, shooting a 67 for low round, but I bet that he is going to get a lot of sponsors exeptions now if he wants then, the kid can compete, outplayed a lot of pros out there.

Ball in a divot on 3, hits into a lake, double bogie, bogies the next, then bounces back and comes in at 72 . . . that course was TOUGH, windy, long, tricky, you saw the leaders crumble. That's awesome playing.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again unless you have declared yourself a professional (which by the way is really easy, just say hey I am a pro now) then you are ineligible for any cash prize on the PGA tour. The catch is you must declare yourself a pro or amateur BEFORE the event. So regardless of the place you take in a tournament an amateur cannot receive any money.

really?!?!?! In europe you need to prove that you can play and have the basic knowledge to play the game. Once you have passed all playing tests and classroom time then you receive a PGA card of Germany. Before you get this you are unable to claim yourself as pro status.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry about that I thought he got a sponsers ex like Wie did.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tadd won a local country club tournament that was a qualifier.

I am curious though... does his caddie get anything? They should give all the winnings to the caddie. That would be cool.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

really?!?!?! In europe you need to prove that you can play and have the basic knowledge to play the game. Once you have passed all playing tests and classroom time then you receive a PGA card of Germany. Before you get this you are unable to claim yourself as pro status.

There is a difference between being a PGA pro and just a golf pro. Anyone can call themselves a golf pro in fact taking money in excess of $700 makes you one automatically. Make a hole in one, win a car, congrats your a pro now. The PGA program to become a class A PGA teaching pro is a long road including several trips to PGA school in Florida, a playing test and several "workbooks" to complete that rival any correspondence course. It is also fairly expensive, my buddy who is currently working his way through it will end up paying well more than $10,000 by the time he is finished. But you cannot be a head pro at a golf course without your PGA accreditation. Or you can make it on tour and become a PGA pro that way. Most of the guys playing on the mini tours are not PGA professionals.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

So if Amateur won a PGA OR Nationwide Event which is probably going to happened. At Children's Hospital Invitational Tournament in Colombia Ohio cause starting the final round the final pair is two amateurs if one of them wins will the cash prize just go to the highest pro or possibly to charity? Just wandering if anyone new? The 2 college kids are playing great golf this week. Kid from Georgia is averaging 328yds. A drive over 3 rounds & hasn't had a bogey in last 40 holes. That's impressive!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
Originally Posted by NM Golf View Post
None

Anyone can call themselves a golf pro in fact taking money in excess of $700 makes you one automatically.

Make a hole in one, win a car, congrats your a pro now.

That's incorrect. Per the USGA: http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules-of-Amateur-Status/Rule-03/

An amateur golfer must not accept a prize (other than a symbolic prize ) or prize voucher of retail value in excess of $750 or the equivalent, or such a lesser figure as may be decided by the USGA. This limit applies to the total prizes or prize vouchers received by an amateur golfer in any one competition or series of competitions.

Exception: A prize, including a cash prize, for a hole-in-one made while playing golf may exceed the above prize limit.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by hjimzaf

That's incorrect.

That was the rule for decades until it was changed a few years ago , shortly before the post from January, 2007 was made.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Haha! I didn't see how old the thread was. All I saw was that the last post was made yesterday.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by rockytopcamaro

So if Amateur won a PGA OR Nationwide Event which is probably going to happened. At Children's Hospital Invitational Tournament in Colombia Ohio cause starting the final round the final pair is two amateurs if one of them wins will the cash prize just go to the highest pro or possibly to charity? Just wandering if anyone new? The 2 college kids are playing great golf this week. Kid from Georgia is averaging 328yds. A drive over 3 rounds & hasn't had a bogey in last 40 holes. That's impressive!


To answer your question, the first place prize money goes to the highest placing professional so in the case of today on the Nationwide Tour Kyle Reifers collected first-place money of $144,000.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

You can go pro easy, the way back is not as easy.

Ones you go pro, you can't compete in amateur matches,

there is no support from the country golf federation or what so ever,

so basicly it's hard for the guy he didn't get the money, for him it's

just good experience that he can compete with these guys, it will not take

long before he goes pro, but than he well have every thing sorted out with

sponsors and other kind off support.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • Iron Game Suffers when Driver Going Well
      For high handicappers myself included, this is typical.   I think it is b/c we don't have the same swing for irons and longer clubs.  If we get them both right in the same round, it is probably by pure luck or coincidence.  Grin and bear, and enjoy the journey.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      The topic title is the question who is the greatest golfer, the poll is the question who was the best. Two different things in my opinion. There's no doubt to me Tiger was a better golfer. How could he not? Spieth, McIlroy, Day but even guys like Wiesberger, Luiten and Donaldson play better golf than Jack. The game evolved so much over the years, and got so much more professional. If Jack would have been around in this era he would benefit from all that as well and be a better golfer than he was (and probably top those guys I just mentioned). But who was the greatest. How do you measure that (can you)? Tiger was dominant in a stronger field, winning more titles than you can count. Jack was the first of a kind, winning the biggest titles (majors) over an enourmous span and having the most of them. Isn't it mostly a matter of personal who you find 'greater'? For me Johan Cruyff is the greatest Dutch football player of time, but I have no doubt that Dennis Bergkamp and Arjen Robben were/are better because the game evolved. 
    • Making a Murderer Discussion Thread (Spoilers Likely)
      Obvisously... she took his case about a month ago. On one hand I hope Avery is guilty as hell, on the other hand it would be an amazing story and twist if turns out to be set up and she can prove that. I think that chance is less than 1%, but still..... Possibly, good point. Should be quite some blood though since they found 'drops', meaning it was dripping from (in this theory) his glove. Exactly my point. I don't think the blood was freely flowing, because than there should be a lot more blood in the car. They found blood consisting with bloody hair. Seems to me, and I know I'm not an expert, that she was already dead when she was in the car, because that would explain the little amount of blood found (no pumping of the heart, no flow of blood) and the place it was found (in the back). One can easily argue that he killed in the garage, moved her to the car, and only then got the plan to burn her instead and moved her again; to the pit. But the 'problem' is that that's not what the DA said what happenend. In my opinion that blood in the car contradicts the story (or truth) he wants us and the jury to believe, and contradicts also with the story of Dassey which is the only thing that links Dassey to the case: his own words. That doesn't mean Avery is innocent, but it might raise some doubt. The DA should stick with the facts, not filling in the blanks with guessing. If he can't prove exact chronologically he shouldn't state it as 'fact'.   Absolutely. I'm not convinced in anything, not in my opinion, not in yours, not at all in the people who made the documentary. Also not a fan of conspiracy theory's. I don't think the murder was planted on him, but I do think some mistakes were made by the justice system. Mistakes that possibly should have lead to his and maybe even more Dassey's release, even though there's a big chance he did it. That's for me perhaps the most interesting part in this case and in the discussion. If we want a justice system where the chance is close to 0% that we convict someone innocent, and the prosecution and police need to follow the rules, it means sometimes the guilty walk free. I think everything they found on the compount while Manitowoc detectives were present should have been excluded. I think the DNA on the blood of the bullet should have been excluded. I think the 'confession' of Dassey should have been excluded. I think Dassey should have given at least a new trial, but that was denied by the same judge which handled his initial case (?!).
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      A long time ago, by Tiger's own admission,  said a golfer's career is measured by "majors won" . So if Woody does not break Jack's major record, then according to Woody, his career will be second to Jack's. Now Jack has said that he expects (expected) Woody to break his major record. So Jack is saying he expects Woody will have the better career.  These are the only two guys who would know who had the best career.   Neither one is going to be the GOAT. They will just be a GOTE. 
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Nope, you blindly worship Jack.  It is obvious that you have not read much, if any, of the thread.  But hey, you saw Jack.  In person, yet.  So what.  I did too.  I saw him win his last USGA championship at Cherry Hills.  I saw Tiger play as well - although in person I only saw practice rounds.  So what.  That does not make my assessment of their respective careers more or less credible.  Geee, I never saw Hogan play so I guess we cannot count him in the discussion.   You think Jack was better.  That is fine.  You are entitled to your opinion.  Just don't spoil it with specious reasons or arguments.  Because those we will slice apart like one of Klinger's salamis.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries