• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Want2PlayMore

The Golf Channel Amateur Tour

153 posts in this topic

I have seen numerouns ads about the Amateur Tour. Who thinks that it is worth it? I was thinking about as I my peoples don't like to golf as much as I do and I wanted to try and compete with others since I don't hoop or play football anymore.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I have seen numerouns ads about the Amateur Tour. Who thinks that it is worth it? I was thinking about as I my peoples don't like to golf as much as I do and I wanted to try and compete with others since I don't hoop or play football anymore.

I've been thinking of the same, but for different reasons. But not until my handicap is below, or at least near, 20 to fit into one of their brackets. I'd like to at least have a game of some sort.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I was under the impression that they had brackets for people that had high handicaps like us. Am I wrong?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that they had brackets for people that had high handicaps like us. Am I wrong?

There's one for 20+ handicappers... somehow, I have it in my head that it's scratch competition within the brackets. Perhaps it's handicap based, but then why bother with brackets?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I think that is very possible.These guys used to that when I played the 3 on 3 hoops tourneys in the 90's. I only played high school ball but the guys we played against put on the entry form that's all they played.But they really played D-1!CHEATERS! But I think that there is something in the seeding where if you continue to score well they are going to move you to lower handicap bracket.Hopefully that will keep the better players from sandbagging and lapping the field.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So how exactly does this amateur thing work? I ve seen the commercials but how does it all work? Whats the purpose?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the purpose is for people like me that are not that good(like me) to get competition in along with maybe a little tour-ish feeling play.For me it would let me try and beat the guy I'm playing against.I like winning,losing....not so much!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im starting to get interested in this golf channel tour the more I hear about it. Does anyone know if there are any kind of money prizes with this tour? I know the actual membership is $200 then around another $200 to enter each event. So whats the payoff for winning an event?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So how exactly does this amateur thing work? I ve seen the commercials but how does it all work? Whats the purpose?

It is to play some organized golf tournaments that don't rely as much on a given club hosting a tournament at the same course over and over. And maybe you can convince yourself that you'd make it on a mini-tour.

Kind of like those vacations where you drive a car quickly on a closed course and shoot paintball guns, pretending to be 007. Only far more frequently, and you're actually hitting a golf ball with golf clubs.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Im starting to get interested in this golf channel tour the more I hear about it. Does anyone know if there are any kind of money prizes with this tour? I know the actual membership is $200 then around another $200 to enter each event. So whats the payoff for winning an event?

I think sometimes it cash and other times it's prizes. but i think that there is a limit to what they can "pay" you so.if they "pay" too much one would lose amatuer status.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The purpose is to give the casual amateur player an opportunity to compete in a local/regional/nationwide tour. You play in handicapped brackets, stroke play, and within your bracket you play gross. It's a lot of fun, you get the opportunity to play interesting courses, and you meet some interesting characters.

I've played in two tournaments in the "Los Angeles" tour, neither of which were in Los Angeles, but close enough. They have both small and big events. For the big ones, they combine several local tours into a regional event, and the field is bigger and stronger. The next LA tour event I'm playing in is in Phoenix!

I think it's a great idea, and if successful, could be effective in promoting and building golf on the amateur level.

Will
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The purpose is to give the casual amateur player an opportunity to compete in a local/regional/nationwide tour. You play in handicapped brackets, stroke play, and within your bracket you play gross. It's a lot of fun, you get the opportunity to play interesting courses, and you meet some interesting characters.

Thanks very much for the info. When I get my handicap (and skill!) down enough that I can reasonably compete in one of the brackets' gross competitions, I plan on joining. Maybe I'll run into you one day (although I suspect different brackets)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

How true are the handicaps? I have heard of tournaments (not Golf Channel tournaments) where a 26 handicapper somehow had the best weekend of his life and combined a 72,75 to win. I assume there is something in place to ensure this doesn't happen?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How true are the handicaps? I have heard of tournaments (not Golf Channel tournaments) where a 26 handicapper somehow had the best weekend of his life and combined a 72,75 to win. I assume there is something in place to ensure this doesn't happen?

I suspect most tournaments that are held outside of established clubs reserve the right to change your handicap for the tournament based on performance. Others might only count your handicap for the first round or two (with reservations of change) and thereafter count only rounds you shoot in a tournament. Then it costs you $2000 to sandbag when you can't win that much by sandbagging.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Anyone a member? How well are the tournaments run? Feedback? Is it worth it for someone in Northern CA? Thanks in advance!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I played a season in the NE tour.

Basically, you paid 125 bucks to play a course that would usually cost you half the price to pay.

Some of the guys that played were cool... but the entire A flight rarely broke 80. Weekend golfers mostly...

VERY VERY SLOW PLAY.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They had a Golf Channel Amatuer Tour tournament at the course I play at (Hardscrabble CC in Fort Smith, AR) a few months ago. I didn't play in it, but from what our pro told me it was just something for people to pay money to come play a private course they wouldn't otherwise have access to.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, you paid 125 bucks to play a course that would usually cost you half the price to pay.

Same here, we saw these guys setting up a few years ago...asked the price to play...we laughed all the way to the bar...$125 buys a lot of beer!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I think you seriously underestimate the difference in the level of dominance each had, when you lump them together as standouts of their caliber, because the calibers were not the same at all.  For the years 1997 through 2007 Tiger was the best player for every single year except 1998 and 2004, and for both 1996 and 2008 he was clearly the best player for the portion of the year he was active. You will find it a challenging task to find anything like that number of years for which Jack was the best.  He was always in the top 3 or so, but not that many years where he was the best.  That is why he has so many fewer POY awards and NO Vardons. Not only did Tiger have more years as the best player for the year, his dominance in those years was far beyond anything Jack ever did in HIS best years.  Tiger had winning streaks of 7, 6, and 5.  Jack's longest was 3 (which isn't even as long as Tigers 4 consecutive MAJORS).  There is the consecutive cut record.  The record setting winning margins in various majors.  The record setting margins by which his stroke averages beat his competitors.  
    • How do I organize a charity tournament to be a raging success?
      26 and a stroke? Holy smokes. Very sorry to hear that.  I have no idea how to organize a tournament but I have played in my share. The best ones are scrambles where you can organize your own team. The outcome has rarely ever mattered to us as long as we were well fed. Find a local restaurant (usually a bbq place) that wants to help you out and give a discount for advertising and spend your money there. Everyone will love to come for a good meal. Some nice prizes and maybe a raffle with some local companies offering you something if you are able to convince them it is worth it to give something to the cause.  Another thing I have seen work well is a silent auction at the end with donated items. I donated airline miles of which I have tons and 100,000 miles went for $205. Free gift for me and the cause got $205. 
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Haha - I get a couple of reputation points for a post and then go and have a blow up hole. Good drive, left myself 145 in down hill (8i), aimed #deadcenter, pulled 2 shots 25 yards left out of bounds, made 9 (+5) in a 9 hole round of (+11). A better way to avoid blow up holes - play stableford!
    • Donald Trump for president?
      Come on now, that's a bit uncalled for in Bernies case.  His political ideals might be way left, but he is at least honest and virtuous.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I'll have to examine your other post closer. That's a good point to consider about the expansion to Continental Europe. Largely explains the poor showing of UK & Ireland in the 60's with many top tier European players not eligible. But considering the 200 million U.S. population base to 63 million in the U.K. & Ireland at the time, the latter did surprisingly well if population base was all that matters. IMO an established competitive golfing culture matters in producing elite players too. Those same European players excluded from Ryder Cup were always eligible for the Majors. The Ryder Cup is also a limited field event. It concentrates the 12 top players of the European Tour. From what I've read, depth of field is still stronger for the 'typical' PGA event, though some non-major Euro events are now stronger than some of the 'minor' PGA events. That is a significant change in Euro competitiveness from the 60's. To some extent that 30% drop sounds like it could be due to simply more international players occupying slots in the fields. If the period you mention covers when majors started to use OWGR for automatic qualification that has some not insignificant inherent issues in terms of strength of field. Having a guaranteed start rather than having to qualify would certainly make for an easier decision to travel to the event. But I'm not arguing against the policy decision facilitating international competition with a little points boost just trying to point out that field strength may not have been as weak in Jack's day as you seem to think. Compared to his peers, which is really the only thing I think you can do without speculative nuance I agree there's no question he's the best golfer. I'm really just arguing that standouts of their caliber (so many more wins so many more majors) than typical players among already elite fields are so rare, that I expect they both represent near the achievable human pinnacle in golf talent, which I don't think really differs within a few generations. The nuances of comparison across eras is interesting to me so I'll debate relative points, but I'm against arguments undervaluing Jack's achievements against 'weak fields'. They both faced very stiff competition.   I'm not dissing Jack. I think his achievements are amazing. I also think the same of Tiger's record. IMO winning percentage per start in the Majors is a very significant stat and Tiger has that in his favor (they are both top 10 and within ~ 2% of each other's number). That number is not the official one for Jack though, I truncated his Major starts to end at age 47, which I think is a reasonable cutoff for competitiveness. If Tiger competes as long as Jack did his major win % (up to age 47) might stay about the same, increase, or decrease (more likely), but he certainly won't match the 18 Majors if he doesn't get like 22+ more major starts between now and age 47.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. glinks
      glinks
      (43 years old)
  • Blog Entries