Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Philfest

Which Rangefinder is best

0  

  1. 1. Which Rangefinder is BEST

    • Bushnell Pinseeker 1500 W/slope
      0
    • Bushnell Pinseeker 1500 W/no slope
      7
    • Bushnell Pinsekker Medalist
      1
    • Other
      2

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

19 posts in this topic

I am considering a new Range Finder ( I know a lot of players are against them), but I think it could be very handy.

Any experiences or opinions on this.....?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I use the Pinseeker 1500 without the slope feature. It is easy to use and very helpful. It has not transformed my game but it has made club selection easier and I don't have to hunt around for yardage markers. I chose the model without the slope feature because mine is sanctioned for tournament use, the one with slope is not. Also, I don't have to download programs or worry about going from course to course; it works the same everywhere. All in all, it has proven to be a very simple, useful device, if not indispensable.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a Bushnell Yardage Pro. It is not as powerful as the pinseekers but is much more compact, and is quite a bit cheaper. My father has a pinseeker and when we walk the course (which is most of the time) he leaves his in the locker and uses mine. Mine works very well out to about 225 from the flag and can give yardages on trees from 300+. It does everything I need it to and is as valuable to me as any of my clubs are. If you walk and carry your bag I would strongly urge you to take a look at it.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

dosent matter which one you get cause any bushnell is great but i like the PS1500 the best personally...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don deal... It's the P/S 1500 in the bag.

Good for you. I hope you enjoy it as much as I enjoy mine.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use my Pinseeker 1500 no slope at practice too - getting to know how far my different wedges go - with different length backswings etc. . . How far a soft 7i goes versus a hard 7 etc . . .

Also use it's 7X magnification to scope out greens up closer before choosing exactly where to aim . . .


Love it! You will too!!!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought the Nikon Monarch 800 and love it. The Pinseaker is also a good unit but somewhat less versitile. I went with the Monarch becasue I also intend to use it for hunting and the Nikon is completely water and fog proof. The target priority aquisition mode can be easily changeed on the Monarch from far target (best for many hunting situations) to near target priority, which is obviously best for golf.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the Slope edition is a better choice if you don't play tournaments...it gives you yardage, plus elevation and adjusted yardage. Would be good for a beginner to get the idea of how much a difference downhill or uphill shots are affected.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the Slope edition is a better choice if you don't play tournaments...it gives you yardage, plus elevation and adjusted yardage. Would be good for a beginner to get the idea of how much a difference downhill or uphill shots are affected.

I think it's a waste of the extra $50. It's a guess what the "adjusted" yardage is and it's absolutely useless in tournaments, if you ever play them. Even if you just play a scramble someone will probably get upset with you if you have it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Erik,

It's illegal and thus a waste of money. I didn't feel as though I commented much on the "slope" feature - everything else I reviewed is the same in the non-slope version. I called the slope feature "quite handy" and "somewhat accurate" but that's about it. If your ball flight is not a "standard" one - higher or lower than normal - you're out of luck.

And again, given the illegality of it (no such rule existed at the time of my review - it was just legal for handicap rounds and that sort of thing), it's not worth the extra $50. You'd literally need to buy a second without slope if you want to use it in a tournament.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I agree about the prohibition of use in tournaments of the sloped version...in fact it is something I would take into consideration if and when I buy one, although I don't know how many tournaments I will ever play in, I am just picking the game back up (well for 2 summers now) after 10 year hiatus for shcool.

I also see people getting upset about them in scrambles with larger prizes on the line. Thanks for the insight...and keep the reviews coming, your guys analysis of the products is great and really helpful.

PS, keep you eye out for one with a dispersion mode to tell me how far my imminent fade to slice will go, I would buy that in a second, maybe it can even predict the winning lotto numbers.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the price, the Tourney edition makes the most sense since it's legal and costs less. However, the slope edition would be a great scouting tool because you can track the slope on the range and get more accurate readings and take that to the course. It would be great for taking notes pre-tournament because there are subtle slopes on new courses that you may never realize.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the price, the Tourney edition makes the most sense since it's legal and costs less. However, the slope edition would be a great scouting tool because you can track the slope on the range and get more accurate readings and take that to the course. It would be great for taking notes pre-tournament because there are subtle slopes on new courses that you may never realize.

I don't believe in judging any distance-related things on the range. Heck, I don't even judge trajectory based on the range. The balls are very much different than the ones I use on the course.

I disagree that the sloped version is worth an extra purchase. Very few people scout a golf course like you're suggesting - I'm far more likely to hit a few shots from a yardage to see if a shot plays longer or shorter if I'm confused. If you have an extra $50 to burn, will never use it in an actual competition (i.e. will limit its use only to practice/scouting rounds), and are close enough to the ideal trajectories built into the unit for the "adjusted" yardages to be somewhat accurate - if you meet all those criteria - then maybe the Slope version is a good purchase. But the people that meet those criteria are a very small minority.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

SG 4 here too. But only because where I work is affiliated with Sky Golf GPS so I got it for a discounted rate. God I love working for a marketing firm.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone else have experience with the Yardage Pro, like NM commented on? Very interested in this model.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • When is the weather "too bad" to play?
      Its the same at Stoneleigh, recovered from aerification, and the rough just loved all the rain.  Member-Guest is next weekend, fairways will be important.
    • Jr Tournament play?
      For the junior tournaments where I worked as a rules official, the parents were not allowed near the players or their balls.  They had the status of being observers or fans, nothing more.  No coaching was allowed, and certainly they did not race ahead to the area where the balls lay after a stroke.  In fact the only carts allowed for family were for those who were disabled - all others walked.  Such potential interaction as you describe would not have been allowed.
    • The Dan Plan - 10,000 Hours to Become a Pro Golfer (Dan McLaughlin)
      Dan is the first to my knowledge to formally challenge the Talent Code, a non gifted individual who would commit to 10,000 hours of practice with the established goal of being a PGA Tour player.   Many members here that claim they want to be a pro golfer are younger kids who show some potential in the sport and are deluded or convinced into believing they have the raw talent required to become a professional.  I don't think we've had someone actually document their journey with the level of transparency Dan provided in the beginning of his "plan".   I started following him later in his plan and while I was initially rooting for him I eventually started to question his approach and commitment, as well as his transparency in his progress.  
    • Using the tee box markers?
      The player is not using equipment in an unusual manner since the  tee marker is not equipment - it is nothing more than an obstruction which is deemed to be fixed (i.e. immovable) when playing his first stroke from the teeing ground of the hole being played.  After that they are movable obstructions.   There is no prohibition about standing on an obstruction, immovable or movable, with one or both feet, when making a stroke as long as nothing is done that would constitute building a stance. As far as being a device, the all encompassing dictionary definition goes well beyond the meaning of the term as it is applied in the Rules of Golf.  A device is an obstruction, and it may be equipment if it meets that definition, but not all obstructions are equipment or devices. This is simply a case of trying to read into the rules something that isn't there.  If it isn't prohibited, then it is permitted.  I see nothing that would lead me to rule against putting one foot on or against a tee marker, provided that the tee marker doesn't move during the process.
    • Chipping from tight lies?
      I agree. Bounce is your friend. I had a pretty straight forward punch shot yesterday.  For short punch shots I like to use more of a pitch motion. An 8 iron has about 4 degrees of bounce. #NoGlide  In terms of difficult lies. I'd say a soggy fairway is the worst. I rather hit of concrete than soggy fairway. It's just tough to let the club glide when the ground has that much give to it. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Adunifon
      Adunifon
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries