• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
TN94z

New desktop

16 posts in this topic

In the past, I have had a Macbook and really liked it.  Now we are thinking about getting a new desktop and I would really like to go with Apple there as well.  I have looked at them in Best Buy but it has been a while.  What would be the best desktop to go with but not spending top dollar?  I work for AT&T; and I believe we get a small discount as well.  I am not a BIG mac user so a little nudge in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Originally Posted by TN94z

In the past, I have had a Macbook and really liked it.  Now we are thinking about getting a new desktop and I would really like to go with Apple there as well.  I have looked at them in Best Buy but it has been a while.  What would be the best desktop to go with but not spending top dollar?  I work for AT&T; and I believe we get a small discount as well.  I am not a BIG mac user so a little nudge in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.


There are a lot of ways you can go.

For example a lot of people are buying laptops (MacBook Air, Mac Mini) and enjoying the heck out of them, even if they use them in the same place fairly often.

We use a Mac Mini - wonderfully priced, particularly if you have a display that works well (even if you need a small adapter) - at our building downtown. They're very capable machines for the size.

And if you want to get the full kit (i.e. computer, display) and you're definitely not moving it around much, the iMac is still at the top of its game.

This guide is helpful and indicates that the Mac Mini is a good buy now, but if you're in the market for an iMac, it may be worth waiting a month or two if you care about buying updated models right when they're released.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

That's the thing is that with Apple, you are gonna pay top dollar no matter what you get.  You will always be able to get a Windows computer cheaper than an Apple with the same specs.  However, that's not to say that a Mac isn't worth it.  My iMac (which I'm typing this on right now) is the best computer I've ever owned.  I bought it about 4 years ago now and overall it's great (although I've upgraded the ram [easy to do] and had to change a failed hdd last year [not as easy]).  On top of that, they are beautiful machines which I don't think I've ever said about anything any other computer manufacturer makes.

If you're not looking to spend a lot of money but still want a Mac, then the Mac Mini is the way to go considering they start at $599, although you will need to get a display with that so figure on another $150 to $200 if you don't already have one.  Still, for $800 after the cost of a decent monitor you'll get a great experience and an operating system that is more user friendly than Windows (although, personally, I do like Windows as well).  By comparison, the cheapest iMac is $1199 (it should be noted though that the specs on the cheapest iMac though line up with the $799 version of the Mac Mini).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by tristanhilton85

That's the thing is that with Apple, you are gonna pay top dollar no matter what you get.  You will always be able to get a Windows computer cheaper than an Apple with the same specs.  However, that's not to say that a Mac isn't worth it.  My iMac (which I'm typing this on right now) is the best computer I've ever owned.  I bought it about 4 years ago now and overall it's great (although I've upgraded the ram [easy to do] and had to change a failed hdd last year [not as easy]).  On top of that, they are beautiful machines which I don't think I've ever said about anything any other computer manufacturer makes.


That used to be true, but the gap has narrowed considerably and in many cases the Mac is actually the better buy.

I haven't checked in awhile, but even when Macs cost more, the ROI and maintenance and whatnot made the Mac a better buy by a wide margin. Quality of components and build quality matters, too. There's nothing like the MacBook Air, for example, and even the base model MacBook Pro is a tank.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I think what kind of display you want (or have) is a big part of it. If you've already go a Dell or HP (or Apple) or whatever display, the Mini is your best bet. You can get up to a 2.7 GHz i7 processor with 4 GB RAM for $800, which is a crazy fast. If you don't have a display you like, you're down to either the Mini, and buying an Apple Thunderbolt Display (27 inches is all they offer) for $1000 or an much cheaper (but also lower quality/not as nice looking) display from Dell/Sony/HP/whoever. Or, you could get an iMac, which is available in either 21.5 or 27 inches. There's no apples to apples (haha) comparison between the two because there is no 2.7 GHz i7 iMac with a 27-inch screen, so it's really your choice whether you want to buy the computer and monitor separate or together. That way whenever you want to replace the computer, you still have an amazing monitor. Then again, the iMac will probably have a higher resale value than the Mini sans monitor if that matters to you.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

When I said not top dollar, I meant in the Apple line period...excluding windows.  I am going to go with Apple regardless.

What about getting the mini and then catching a TV on sale at Christmas with a monitor connection?  I ask because, as everyone knows, you can get a good sized tv very cheap that time of the year.  I still have a 50" wall mounted plasma in my living room that I got for less than 600.00.

The iMac is what I looked at in Best Buy.  Of course we really liked the big monitor.  Man was it clear!!  I may be leaning toward the mini though.  I had never really read about them that much. They would be well qualified for our use.  My wife will use it for school and I would basically use it for pictures, videos, and golf software.  We will probably go that direction, unless she wants a laptop.  But we have pretty much decided against the laptop for our next one.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by TN94z

What about getting the mini and then catching a TV on sale at Christmas with a monitor connection?  I ask because, as everyone knows, you can get a good sized tv very cheap that time of the year.  I still have a 50" wall mounted plasma in my living room that I got for less than 600.00.

That could work, but you'd have to be sitting far enough away for the size to make sense. Even the 27" displays are pretty big - you'll want to be sitting back from it a bit more than you might be used to. :-)

Originally Posted by TN94z

The iMac is what I looked at in Best Buy.  Of course we really liked the big monitor.  Man was it clear!!  I may be leaning toward the mini though.  I had never really read about them that much. They would be well qualified for our use.  My wife will use it for school and I would basically use it for pictures, videos, and golf software.  We will probably go that direction, unless she wants a laptop.  But we have pretty much decided against the laptop for our next one.

Note that the new models don't have the optical drive. You can buy a USB one that works well, but it's another $79. And the keyboard. You might want to reconsider the iMacs. ;-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements



Originally Posted by iacas

That could work, but you'd have to be sitting far enough away for the size to make sense. Even the 27" displays are pretty big - you'll want to be sitting back from it a bit more than you might be used to. :-)

Note that the new models don't have the optical drive. You can buy a USB one that works well, but it's another $79. And the keyboard. You might want to reconsider the iMacs. ;-)



Yeah, it wouldn't be the 50" model by any means.  It would be closer to the original 27".  The iMacs aren't out of the equation at all.  I need to check on our pricing and somewhat compare the two and see what I come up with.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements



Originally Posted by tristanhilton85

That's the thing is that with Apple, you are gonna pay top dollar no matter what you get.  You will always be able to get a Windows computer cheaper than an Apple with the same specs.  However, that's not to say that a Mac isn't worth it.  My iMac (which I'm typing this on right now) is the best computer I've ever owned.  I bought it about 4 years ago now and overall it's great (although I've upgraded the ram [easy to do] and had to change a failed hdd last year [not as easy]).  On top of that, they are beautiful machines which I don't think I've ever said about anything any other computer manufacturer makes.

If you're not looking to spend a lot of money but still want a Mac, then the Mac Mini is the way to go considering they start at $599, although you will need to get a display with that so figure on another $150 to $200 if you don't already have one.  Still, for $800 after the cost of a decent monitor you'll get a great experience and an operating system that is more user friendly than Windows (although, personally, I do like Windows as well).  By comparison, the cheapest iMac is $1199 (it should be noted though that the specs on the cheapest iMac though line up with the $799 version of the Mac Mini).

The Macbook Air and Macbook Pro, the entry level models the Wintel consortiums are having a heck of a time competing with Apple pricewise. Tim Cook really did a job in integrating the manufacturing process.

If you just want a machine, sure, you can get something really cheap and get started, but if you want something approaching the higher end, the tables have turned and Apple is the better value. Also, none of the tablet competitors can outprice Apple.

I bought a used Mini for $400 about 4 years ago and attached it to a 42" flat screen. I love it. Boots in 30 seconds with 1gb of memory and it serves as a HTPC very well. I live in an apartment, so I can use a mouse as a remote. One thing about the Mini is that it is really easy to carry around, not that that was what it was made for, but I made no problems bringing it to other places to play movies.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I've been a Mac guy since 1990. For personal and business use, I've likely bought over 100 Macs. My daughter teaches people how to use their Apple products at one of their flagship stores. My Apple knowledge is fair and my Apple bias is great.

What do you want to do with the desktop? How is what you wish to do different than what you wish to do with the Macbook?

If you want something that sits on a desk, the iMacs are super. Fast, simple, fewer cords, wireless keyboards and mice... Be careful about the 27" as it is big and you may not want that much on your desk. On a narrow desk it feel too close for some.

We have a Macbook at home because my wife wants a very small look and footprint. No additional monitor. Nice to be able to grab it, sit on the couch and surf. I could not do that with a desktop. I use a 27" iMac on my desk at work ever since my Macbook went home. I now use the additional monitor that I was using with the Macbook with my iMac. Two screens and lots of space.

We use a Mini for as one of our servers at the office. Fast, simple, but you need to already have everything like keyboards... My brother-in-law has his Mini hooked up to his TV and uses it for movies and who knows what else. With a wireless keyboard, he can sit on the couch and run his Moni without anyone even needed to see it.

If I needed to reclaim the family Macbook for an employee (very possible), I'd consider an iPad for home. I think everything we've used our home computer for in the last six months could have been done on an iPad. And once iCloud is running smoothly, and I know we won't need a computer to sync everything, the pressure to move to an iPad will become great in our house.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by rustyredcab

I've been a Mac guy since 1990. For personal and business use, I've likely bought over 100 Macs. My daughter teaches people how to use their Apple products at one of their flagship stores. My Apple knowledge is fair and my Apple bias is great.

What do you want to do with the desktop? How is what you wish to do different than what you wish to do with the Macbook?

If you want something that sits on a desk, the iMacs are super. Fast, simple, fewer cords, wireless keyboards and mice... Be careful about the 27" as it is big and you may not want that much on your desk. On a narrow desk it feel too close for some.

We have a Macbook at home because my wife wants a very small look and footprint. No additional monitor. Nice to be able to grab it, sit on the couch and surf. I could not do that with a desktop. I use a 27" iMac on my desk at work ever since my Macbook went home. I now use the additional monitor that I was using with the Macbook with my iMac. Two screens and lots of space.

We use a Mini for as one of our servers at the office. Fast, simple, but you need to already have everything like keyboards... My brother-in-law has his Mini hooked up to his TV and uses it for movies and who knows what else. With a wireless keyboard, he can sit on the couch and run his Moni without anyone even needed to see it.

If I needed to reclaim the family Macbook for an employee (very possible), I'd consider an iPad for home. I think everything we've used our home computer for in the last six months could have been done on an iPad. And once iCloud is running smoothly, and I know we won't need a computer to sync everything, the pressure to move to an iPad will become great in our house.

The desktop will be used for average every day things.  My wife's school, video and picture editing, analyzer software, etc....As far as difference in use, there really won't be any.  I just want it in our computer room and not brought out into the living room where my step son can go crazy on it.  But that can be solved by allowing him control over the current Windows Vista having piece of crap laptop.

But, I like the idea of incorporating the mini with my home theater and it being hidden.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

As others have said, watch the value proposition for a mini once you add in the keyboard, mouse, video cables, any adapters... And also remember that if you use your TV as a monitor, you can not watch TV while your wife uses the computer for school.

Sounds like you have an abundance of good options.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by TN94z

But, I like the idea of incorporating the mini with my home theater and it being hidden.

Analyzr on your TV looks really good, btw.

Ooh, that reminds me of a feature to add to http://analyzrgolf.com/feature_compare/ .

I'm guessing you may end up with an iMac. They hold their value pretty well, too - you can sell it in a few years.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Okay, it looks like this is the price I can get an iMac for:

2.7i5

4GB RAM

1TB Serial ATA

AMD Radeon 512MB GDDR5

Magic Mouse

Wireless Keyboard

27" Thunderbolt

3 year Apple Protection Plan

1746 shipped

Mini:

2.7i7

4GB RAM

500GB Serial ATA

Magic Mouse

Wireless Keyboard

Mini Display Port to VGA

AppleCare

1129 shipped + monitor/tv...250 maybe.

1379.00

I would get faster processor speed in the mini but sacrifice HD space. I talked with my wife last night and we wouldn't want to hook it up to the tv in the living room just from a student's standpoint.  But we could move it back and forth depending on what we are using it for at the time.  So, it looks like I can get the iMac for roughly 350.00 more.  Obviously this is the pricing as of right now.  If I choose to go with an iMac, I would probably wait a little bit until the new models are released.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by TN94z

Okay, it looks like this is the price I can get an iMac for:

2.7i5

4GB RAM

1TB Serial ATA

AMD Radeon 512MB GDDR5

Magic Mouse

Wireless Keyboard

27" Thunderbolt

3 year Apple Protection Plan

1746 shipped

Mini:

2.7i7

4GB RAM

500GB Serial ATA

Magic Mouse

Wireless Keyboard

Mini Display Port to VGA

AppleCare

1129 shipped + monitor/tv...250 maybe.

1379.00

I would get faster processor speed in the mini but sacrifice HD space. I talked with my wife last night and we wouldn't want to hook it up to the tv in the living room just from a student's standpoint.  But we could move it back and forth depending on what we are using it for at the time.  So, it looks like I can get the iMac for roughly 350.00 more.  Obviously this is the pricing as of right now.  If I choose to go with an iMac, I would probably wait a little bit until the new models are released.

The iMac can be hooked up to the TV too. You'd just need a Thunderbolt -> HDMI adapter.

Also, you probably don't want the VGA on the Mini if you go that route. Probably want more of an HDMI adapter or a DV adapter or something. VGA isn't capable of the higher resolutions, is it?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements



Originally Posted by iacas

The iMac can be hooked up to the TV too. You'd just need a Thunderbolt -> HDMI adapter.

Also, you probably don't want the VGA on the Mini if you go that route. Probably want more of an HDMI adapter or a DV adapter or something. VGA isn't capable of the higher resolutions, is it?


You are right.  I think I chose that one by mistake.  They had an HDMI-HDMI as an option.  The more I read, I am leaning towards the iMac.  So it will probably be a little while before I make a purchase.  Thanks for all of the suggestions though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • 2016 TST Initiative: Forward Tees Tournament
      In Lowest Score Wins, we recommend that golfers play from the forward tees in order to experience "breaking 80" for the first time, or shooting 65, or having more birdie putts than they've ever had, or whatever. This year, in 2016, we're taking it one step farther: we're encouraging everyone here to work with the head pro at your home course (or, if you play multiple courses, the head pro at each of them!) and to set up a serious "Forward Tees Tournament." A Forward Tees Tournament (FTT) will be: FUN! Enlightening Unique Challenging I'll give anyone who creates and/or participates in a FTT this year the special achievement/award seen to the left. Anyone with this award will be entered to win a TST prize to be determined at the end of the year (and I'll do my best to make it a fairly good prize, but that shouldn't be the main reason why anyone should do this). You can play: With or without handicaps. With or without brackets/divisions/flights. Stroke play or match play. 18, 27, 36, 54+ holes. One day, two days, three days. Etc. I think golfers will love playing in this type of tournament. I think it will challenge them to think about how they play and score. I think it will result in faster play, more fun, more birdies, more chances to hit 7-iron into par fives and feel like a Tour player for once, and… lower scores (or higher scores for the dumb players!). So there you have it. What can you do from here? Pledge here in this thread to talk to your head pro. Recruit your buddies and local golfers to play in your event. Work with your head pro to make the event a success. Play in the event! Post here after your tournament has been played to claim your super-exclusive award/achievement! I'm in. I'll be doing this, hopefully at multiple courses this year. Are you?
    • Posting old scores
      I haven't had an official handicap for about 15 years because in the past several I've only been able to play 6-8 times per year. This year I joined a club so that I could play in tournaments and since I need five scores to get a handicap, I entered some scores in GHIN from my last few rounds in 2015 (since I play so rarely, I can remember them). When I was doing this, I forgot to change the date when posting a score from August so it defaulted to today and is now my most recent reported score. GHIN won't let me change the entry but says to "contact my club" to fix it, which seems like a hassle for everyone involved. It's not my lowest score but it's close, so it will probably be included in my handicap calculation for quite a while unless the date is changed. How big of a deal is this?
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Another thing is sometimes to 'give up' on par. For example, as a bogey golfer, if I hit a bad tee shot and end up say 220yds from the hold on a par 4 rather than the usual 130yds, play the hole as if bogey is the new par. You've made the hole more difficult for yourself and rather than trying to hit the green with a 3 wood (a green designed to be hit with a mid/short iron), take 2 shots to get on the green and 2 shots to get down. 1 220yd par 4 is an easy hole (could even make birdie (which becomes par and a great save) whereas a 220 yd par 3, not off the tee, is asking for trouble. Not always the best way to play golf (read Lowest Score Wins) but the best way to avoid blowing up.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Find it yourself please. I don't think that would provide much insight. Courses, technology… all very different. Too many differences. People who qualify for the Opens rarely actually compete for them. The winners and top finishers almost always come from those who qualify automatically. I'm not. Very few foreign golfers played on the PGA Tour in the 60s. It's been steadily growing - and travel has made it easier, too - through to now. And even now we're starting to see Asian golfers really take over. The only Asian golfer many could name who competed against Nicklaus was Isao Aoki. Maybe Jumbo Ozaki. I'm just talking about the number of golfers. There are a ton more now. I don't care. I realize perhaps your condition forces you to take everything literally, but I wasn't being literal here. The PGA Tour takes the best 150 players or so out of X. As X grows, the amount of separation between those top 150 players narrows. We're in a very narrow phase right now. When Jack was playing, the gap was significantly wider. No. Tiger was quite a bit more dominant and "above" even MORE highly competitive fields. Both halves of that are true: Tiger won by larger margins and against stronger fields. I agree. And I've said similar things. No…? You don't say? (On page 273 of a thread doing just that…)? You seem to be the only person who regards WGCs as weaker fields that offer a "competitive break." It says a lot about how others should consider your opinions on strength of field. You're assuming or haven't read many of my posts in this thread, because I've said several times that I'd put it within a few points of 50/50. Maybe 55/45. Hardly what I'd call "strong." Of course we're both "estimating." Tiger's record, IMO, against significantly stiffer competition, puts him ahead. Not by a lot. Not really. If only 30 players had a realistic chance to win a tournament, adding players beyond that 30th player does little to affect the strength of the field. The WGCs could add 200 club professionals that would never win and… the strength of field would remain exactly the same. Where have I said this? Because even if I did, it doesn't support whatever you're trying to force it into supporting here. The odds of a club pro beating anyone on the PGA Tour these days are slim to none. They were slightly more likely back when fewer "A" players played the PGA Tour… like in the 60s and 70s. A "C" player's game almost never varies enough - not for four days - to beat even 10 or 15 "A" players. Here's an opinion, but one I could probably back up if I cared enough to take the time (I do not): a modern WGC has a stronger field than many (perhaps all) of the majors Nicklaus won. I've said this before, and will say it again here: In Jack's day, there were maybe 10-15 "A" players, 25 "B" players, and the rest were "C" players. Today there are 100+ A players and the rest B players. I'm also going to request, mostly because of the number of times I've had to repeat myself in this thread, that you not quote or respond to me, @natureboy, in this thread. I'm not keen on repeating myself about something that, ultimately, I don't care that much about. It is what it is, their records are what they are, and they could only beat the guys they played against.
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Never try to hit through trees, always just get back to the fairway.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries