Jump to content
IGNORED

Another Boundary Fence Question


ghalfaire
Note: This thread is 4440 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts



Originally Posted by rustyredcab

IF the play was right handed back toward the tee, would NPR need to be figured as if playing back toward the tee?

I understand once dropped, one can change one's mind about what kind of shot will now be played. My question is, if NPR is based on a shot back toward the tee, it will be close to the path. In this case it might not matter because you are likely to get a second drop. But if the obstruction was such that it did matter, would you need that first drop to be for a back to the tee shot?


Don't overcomplicate it, if you take it step by step, everything is easy!

From your original lie, you first decide what shot you will make. You're pretty free to choose your line here, as long as it's reasonable---so no aiming out of bounds or into a stand of trees or using some awkward stance just for purposes of obtaining relief. You can also do something unusual, like playing cross-handed in this case, if there's some circumstance that makes it a reasonable choice. Just figure out what shot you want to make and how you'd take your stance/swing to make that happen.

If that direction / stance / swing is interfered with, then you get relief for that particular shot. If it's left-handed back toward the tee due to some bizarre arrangement of factors, then you find the NPR for a left-handed stroke back toward the tee. Whatever the case, you take full relief for the stroke you would play if not for the obstruction.

Now you have a ball in play in a new place. Everything starts over. Nothing you did up to now affects your options (well, except for the case that your relief from two obstructions has put you in a loop of taking relief from one, then the other, etc, but that is quite rare).

Most rules work this way. It's rare that you have to deal with a combination of rules simultaneously. Take them one at a time, deal with the first situation, then address the result separately.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by zeg

... If it's left-handed back toward the tee due to some bizarre arrangement of factors, then you find the NPR for a left-handed stroke back toward the tee...


That`'s exactly how I understand it. The NPR must match the shot that cause the need for relief.

New addition: If the relief was from something other than the cart path, can the NPR create a drop that is on the cart path or must it also avoid the path?

Frequent Example from my old home course: a free relief flower bed that is bordered by a cart path -- one club out of the flowers will put you on the path. Is this going to be a two drop scenario or is NPR extended to include additional obstructions?

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by rustyredcab

New addition: If the relief was from something other than the cart path, can the NPR create a drop that is on the cart path or must it also avoid the path?

Frequent Example from my old home course: a free relief flower bed that is bordered by a cart path -- one club out of the flowers will put you on the path. Is this going to be a two drop scenario or is NPR extended to include additional obstructions?

You always take relief from one obstruction at a time. It's ok to drop on the cart path to get relief from something else.

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by rustyredcab

Frequent Example from my old home course: a free relief flower bed that is bordered by a cart path -- one club out of the flowers will put you on the path. Is this going to be a two drop scenario or is NPR extended to include additional obstructions?


This is not an unusual situation. In fact the committee can introduce the local rule below to speed things up and allow relief in one step.

33-8/25

Local Rule for Ground Under Repair Adjacent to Artificially-Surfaced Cart Path

Q. When ground under repair is adjacent to an artificially-surfaced cart path (an obstruction), sometimes a player, after obtaining relief from one condition, is interfered with by the other condition. Thus, another drop under another Rule results. This is cumbersome and could lead to complications. Would it be proper to eliminate the problem by means of a Local Rule under which ground under repair adjacent to an artificially-surfaced cart path would have the same status as the cart path?

A. Yes. If white lines are used to define ground under repair, a Local Rule is suggested as follows:

"White-lined areas tying into artificially-surfaced roads or paths are declared to have the same status as the roads or paths, i.e., they are obstructions, not ground under repair. Relief, without penalty, is provided under Rule 24-2b(i) ."

Your version could simply say 'the flower bed located at ....is declared to have the same status as the adjacent cart path .....' or some such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4440 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬛⬛🟩🟨⬛ 🟩⬛🟩⬛🟨 🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...