• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
TAZBOM

How Much Farther Will a Hybrid Hit The Ball Than an Iron????

19 posts in this topic

If a player hits a 21 degree 38.25 inch 4 iron 170, how far would he typically hit a 21 degree 40 inch 4 hybrid?  I am trying to fill the gap between the 4 irno and a 3 wood that is hit about 205 yards.  I am not sure if I should get 2 and 3 hybrids or if the gapping will be off.  Any help you can give on that is much appreciated!!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

i'd suggest getting on a monitor and hit different types of hybrids. the reason why i say this is bc not only would a recommendation on a particular club be unwise, but different hybrids of even the same loft will yield you different yardages. i have a 3hybrid but i have it adjusted for a higher loft so much that it's by loft numbers, 1 shy of my 4iron, but goes 20-25 yards further than my 4i. hit as many as you can, make an informed decision as there are TONS of different hybrids out there with varying head and shaft options. with any club, buy what fits your game and what you need in the bag. best of luck!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It also depends on how well you hit your hybrid. I used to play with a 4h and couldn't hit it as far as my 4i even though the loft was higher by 1.5 degrees (at the time the club was meant as a replacement 3i).

My current setup is:

Driver - 10.5

3W - 15 (4.5 degrees from Driver)

3H - 19 (4 degrees from 3W)

4i - 22.5 (3.5 degrees from 3H)

5i - 25.5 (3 degrees from 4i)

Check your iron lofts and go for something that creates good consistent gapping.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by TAZBOM

If a player hits a 21 degree 38.25 inch 4 iron 170, how far would he typically hit a 21 degree 40 inch 4 hybrid?  I am trying to fill the gap between the 4 irno and a 3 wood that is hit about 205 yards.  I am not sure if I should get 2 and 3 hybrids or if the gapping will be off.  Any help you can give on that is much appreciated!!!



If you hit a 3-wood 205, you might want to consider hybrids in general.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It matters whether you have a traditional hybrid, or an iron-replacement hybrid. You are looking at traditional hybrids, which have a shaft length between a FW and an iron.

Some iron models have IR hybrids, which have almost the same loft and shaft length as the same-numbered irons in the set. Mizuno, for example, had JPX Fli-Hi hybrids which can replace longer irons in the JPX-800 and 800 Pro sets. The Cobra S2 Max iron/hybrid set from 2010 had the same idea.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If its a wood-like hybrid, Id say on average a person would hit a hybrid 10-15 yards higher than an iron because the hybrid has more carry distance.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't get it. I hit an old persimmon 3-wood about 200-210 yards. I picked up a Big Bertha 3 Hybrid-20 degrees, and it comes now where close to that distance. I tried putting the ball up, middle and back of my stance. I hit it clean with a nice sweeping swing. How do youguys get the distance out of those hybrids?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't get it. I hit an old persimmon 3-wood about 200-210 yards. I picked up a Big Bertha 3 Hybrid-20 degrees, and it comes now where close to that distance. I tried putting the ball up, middle and back of my stance. I hit it clean with a nice sweeping swing. How do youguys get the distance out of those hybrids?

Your 3 wood is likely 15* and probably has a little longer shaft. You should hit it a little longer than a 20* hybrid that most people will use as a replacement for their 3 iron.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I just got a 4h 21 degree hybrid burner 2.0. It's really great. Just played a 9 hole executive course, only 5 holes of it waiting for my kids league class. On 2 of the par three 175 yards (I adjusted the distance to get 175 for both holes) and teeing up 1/4 " I get it right on the green at a high trajectory. It landed with a definite thump. One was on the green the other just in front of it. From the ground it gets about 185 yards with a really high trajectory. It seemed to hold two greens off a 1/4" tee and an even higher trajectory. I would recommend the hybrid just as good clubs to have rather than irons only. This gives you a choice of landing trajectories. My irons tend to be really flat. It seems to give me more choices, even though I am a relative novice at this game. Just for reference I get about 200 yards from my 5 fairway wood.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I have a 4 hybrid right now, and I feel it goes maybe, 5-10 further if struck on the screws than a 4I, but I'll always prefer a 4iron, and don't carry the hybrid as much anymore.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it seems to me that my hybrid (nike vrs 18) goes a little further than my 4 iron, but it rolls forever

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My 4 hybrid is 22*, so a 3 iron replacement. I get 15 yards more out of it than my 23 degree 4 iron, so the distance gap works. I read that a 2* loft differential would be about right to match up a hybrid with the equivalent iron, so a 22* hybrid should effectively replaces a 20* 3 iron. Seems to make some sense as guideline.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I notice the hybrids are good for about 15yds more than the iron equivalent, and I carry both a 5H and a 5I.  I carry both for shot trajectory, not for closing yardage gaps.  If it is windy, or I am hitting from quite a distance and not really going for the green, I will hit the iron.  My long iron shots (and I think most everyone's long iron shots) have a more piercing trajectory that works better on windy days and also when I want to take advantage of any roll.  But I use the hybrid when I want to hit it high and land it soft, like a 190yd shot into a par 3.

So, noy just about yardage!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 19* hybrid, so theoretically I believe it's a 2-iron equivalent??  My 4-iron (24*) struck well is 205-210, and the hybrid is 220.  If it was true that hybrids went further, then the gap should be bigger, I would think.

So from my standpoint, I would say that hybrids don't fly further for well struck shots.  However, the drop off from a poorly struck shot (I'm thinking toe-hits since those are my "favorite") is probably quite a bit less with a hybrid.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I'd say that a Hybrid doesn't fly further than a well hit club (fairway wood or iron) of the same degree.  But, from my experience, it is easier to get a hybrid airborne.  And flight the ball much higher than an iron.  For instance, my 5 Hybrid I can carry it ~ 200 to 205yds.  Pretty similar carry distance to my 5i (slightly less).  But the Hybrid I can hit very high in the air... With consistency.  The 5i... Not so much.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I've been thinking of switching my 3,4, and 5 irons out for hybrids

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Jeffrey71

I've been thinking of switching my 3,4, and 5 irons out for hybrids

I only started using hybrids in the last 1.5yrs... And really like the 5H I currently carry.

My recommendation is to get on a launch monitor and hit all different degrees of loft and brands to see what works best for you.  I found this out the hard way....

For instance, I first bought a 4H and 5H R11 Rescues at the same time.  Because I wasn't sure which I would prefer - so I bought them both after hitting them decent on a monitor.  Then I realized that I was using my 5H more often than the 4H... So I traded the 4H in for a 3H RBZ.

5H is a money club.  But my 3H RBZ is currently out of my bag...  I probably should just trade the 3H back in and look for another 3H R11 Rescue.  But I have been doinking around with other parts of my bag... And currently worrying about my 3H which I rarely use is low on the priority list.  But this thread may change that?!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

hit down on it like a wedge or short iron, i hit 4h like 210 by simply doing this, 180 with sweep wing

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • GAME GOLF - Digital Tracking System
      Well, I went ahead and bit. Amazon Warehouse Deals has a few for $86 each. I had a $25 Amazon GC from Christmas, so after tax, it's going to be $66. It says the packaging is damaged, but no mention of problems with the device. Here's hoping it comes in good shape, and that it warms up pretty quickly so I can use it!
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (February 2016)
      The tournament I was supposed to play in was cancelled , so I played in a shotgun start today. The group I was in played at a quicker pace than the group in front and the group behind us, so I had plenty of opportunities for practicing greenside chipping and bunker shots as well as putting.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      While I expect it's largely accurate, I was more interested in a link to the actual quote than your paraphrase. The context of the question and interview plus the exact wording gives a clearer understanding of the statement. I accept deeper field of talent, I don't accept that it's automatically 'a ton' or an order of magnitude greater. What's the average score relative to the field (or % making the cut) in the PGA for the Pros vs. the PGA qualifiers from then to now? That could provide some insight to relative gap between majors field depth then and now. I am certain it's gotten harder for the PGA qualifiers to make it tot he weekend. I am less certain by how much the margin has shifted. The reason I stress the Majors and Opens is that size of field and openness to qualifiers is very important in making the top competitors face many elite players with potential to have a hot run of form. You're comparing apples to oranges there. That was ~ 1.5 million players in the U.S., not the world population of golfers. About 26 million golfers today in the U.S. Worldwide in 1920 who knows? But including Europe, Australia, and other 'commonwealth' countries it was likely double that - maybe triple. Also I can find no credible estimate that supports 100 million current golfers worldwide. Most generous is about 61 million. While there are a lot of clubs world-wide, participation of 'casual' unaffiliated golfers per club is not going to be the same as in the U.S. and that's the only way I get a number close to 100 million based on actual data. U.S. golf population talent base roughly tripled between Jack and Tiger and I expect worldwide it was a similar rate of increase. I think since the 1920's the U.S. has had about half the wold golf population, though that's started to decline of late as Asian participation increases. Jack was head and shoulders above highly competitive fields for nearly a generation similar to Tiger. I don't think human abilities change by orders of magnitude in short spans of time so I expect that Jack was an outlier of similar human ability as Tiger. How close and who has the edge is IMO debatable. Were Tiger's achievements (esp. the 'beat the field' streak) tougher than Jack's because of field depth, yes. How much more I'm not as sure as you. Did a relative 'competitive break' from full field events offered by the WGC's help Tiger there? Don't know but it's possible. Combine Tiger's regular wins and Majors and I have no problem giving him the greatest player of all time nod. I just don't think it's as cut and dried or by as large a margin as you seem to. They didn't play against each other so your confidence isn't any more a fact than my uncertainty. We're both estimating. Size of the field actually competing matters too, not just who wasn't invited to the party. I like the idea of a top player field and enjoy watching the events, but if only the top 50 players are playing they all have a better shot statistically than if the field was open to 156 or more players who are still very 'elite' in skill. As you've said in many posts, golf skill performance is highly variable. I agree and that's why I think size of field is relevant to the comparison, because I think the scoring variability of the top 90 golfers in the world overlaps considerably with the next 90 down and even a bit beyond that. That's why I wondered whether WGC wins are a bit less valuable than a major or a full field PGA tour event that's also open to Monday qualifying. Granted the world ranking system is better than it used to be, but it still weights international events more strongly than they deserve. Some of the reasons I think you may be undervaluing Nicklaus' achievement in comparing across eras.
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (January 2016)
      I managed to complete the January challenge (without missing a day, I believe). It was a great months' work for my game - having to blog every day sure helps to focus each session.
    • Steel vs Graphite generic question
      S300 is one of the lowest launching steel shafts.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries