• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Robamos

R11s Driver

21 posts in this topic

This is the best driver I have ever used.

The distance and accuracy is fantastic.

I will definitely look at the R11s Fairway wood as well.

Well doen TaylorMade, another winner.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Hmmmm, this has the smell of meat by product.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, first post is a love fest with r11s??  He's A TM rep...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Major snafu tonight with the Golf Galaxy midnight release of the R11s and RBZ. I went with the intentions of picking up an R11s driver and an RBZ 3w. For some reason the R11s products won't scan in any computers. They keep getting a message saying the product release date isn't yet. GG called the TM help line and said the problem is nationwide. Ended up only leaving with the RBZ 3w. I have to go back in the morning to see if it's straightened out. They gave me two free sleeves of RBZ balls, free grippin fee on both clubs and (I think accidentally) an second RBZ headcover for the 3w.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just a weekend golfer playing off 13.

The R11s for me is a good thing.

Balance and weight distribution have improved over the R11.

I have moved through many drivers but none as good as this one.

I now having a look at R11s Fairway Wood.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Being a weekend golfer, do you really feel that the tuning ability in the R11s is all that necessary? I've been looking around for a new driver lately and was wondering if I'd even use all that tuning stuff that the R11s has.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If anything, all that adjustability could be used to correct (hide) a high handicappers swing faults.  I see it as a crutch of sorts.....I mean why would a low-capper that has a fairly well-grooved swing need a 35 yard (or more) adjustment in either direction?  It's not like they can adjust it mid-round to try a make a cut around a dog leg or something, it's not allowed.  But....help a low-capper by giving them some fine tuning?  You bet.  I honestly believe this club is directed at all skill levels.  There is another thread here that is associating the R11 line with high skilled players and the burner (or RBZ) products for the hackers beacuse if their cost.  I think the hacker will get more benefit from the infinitely adjustable clubs, and those that have a well developed swing actual need less adjustments.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still smells like meat food to me.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hit almost all the new drivers on a LM on friday, had a few drivers to turn in for credit so I knew I was going to get a new one.  The R11s killed all the others in flight, spin, and ball speed.  I was getting about 40yds longer run outs with the R11s because of the lower spin.  I bought it.  Crazy because I HATED the R11.  Biggest surprises for me? The RBZ sucked in my hands, and so did the G20.  I could not control the RBZ, never got the feel for where the head was.  The spin on the G20 was crazy high, run outs of only 250.  My SS is around 107 FYI.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually had a hard time hitting the R11s. It just didn't feel that good in my hands and the RBZ was much better. I am still curious if the R11s with the aldila phenom 60 in it is the same as the one in the titleist d3 drivers?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by ajohnson161

I could not control the RBZ, never got the feel for where the head was.  The spin on the G20 was crazy high, run outs of only 250.  My SS is around 107 FYI.

Did you have the same shaft in all of them?? The shaft is a huge factor when it comes to spin.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by ajohnson161

I hit almost all the new drivers on a LM on friday, had a few drivers to turn in for credit so I knew I was going to get a new one.  The R11s killed all the others in flight, spin, and ball speed.  I was getting about 40yds longer run outs with the R11s because of the lower spin.  I bought it.  Crazy because I HATED the R11.  Biggest surprises for me? The RBZ sucked in my hands, and so did the G20.  I could not control the RBZ, never got the feel for where the head was.  The spin on the G20 was crazy high, run outs of only 250.  My SS is around 107 FYI.



What shaft did you go with?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements



Originally Posted by jcard71

I agree, first post is a love fest with r11s??  He's A TM rep...



hey driver love,

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those who are comparing launch angle and spin from various drivers, are you using the same shaft?  The clubhead (apart from loft) has very little to do with this.  They can manipulate the sweet spot through weight distribution, and increase face speed through materials and design, but launch angle and spin are going to be functions of shaft properties and loft.

As for those who are knocking the adjustability factor as a crutch....  I agree that people should have solid golf swings.  But compare Matt Kuchar (flattest swing ever) and Colin Montgomerie (most upright swing ever).  Both are excellent golfers, potentially HoF.  Both (I'm sure) have adjustments made to their clubs to make sure the equipment is enhancing what they do well, not limiting it.

All that adjustability does is bring this same level of customization, previously available only in tour vans, to the neighborhood pro shop.  Most of us could benefit from one degree flatter or more upright.  Few of us have the resources, time, or patience to hit ten shots with a driver, then bend it, then hit ten more shots, then bend it back... ad nauseum.  You shouldn't be setting your driver 5 degrees closed to cure your slice (it's easier fixed by changing your grip and stance, anyway).  You should, however, make minor adjustments to your club setup so that you're starting with the club well-soled and square.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements



Originally Posted by k-troop

As for those who are knocking the adjustability factor as a crutch....  I agree that people should have solid golf swings.  But compare Matt Kuchar (flattest swing ever) and Colin Montgomerie (most upright swing ever).  Both are excellent golfers, potentially HoF.  Both (I'm sure) have adjustments made to their clubs to make sure the equipment is enhancing what they do well, not limiting it.




Originally Posted by moparman426

I see it as a crutch of sorts.....



I wasn't knocking it.....because it can be used to mask a high handicappers swing faults (which is why I am looking for a nice, used r9 supertri .)  All I was alluding to is that I can't see a tour pro needing a 35 yard adjustment, so the club isn't necessarily directed at the best golfers out there.  Everyone can benefit from it.  Someone else had pointed out that the lesser lines were for beginners, and I said the opposite could be true.  I also didn't say it was limiting good players either, I said it allowed them to fine-tune.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites







I wasn't knocking it.....because it can be used to mask a high handicappers swing faults (which is why I am looking for a nice, used r9 supertri .)  All I was alluding to is that I can't see a tour pro needing a 35 yard adjustment, so the club isn't necessarily directed at the best golfers out there.  Everyone can benefit from it.  Someone else had pointed out that the lesser lines were for beginners, and I said the opposite could be true.  I also didn't say it was limiting good players either, I said it allowed them to fine-tune.





I think you've got it 100% backward. It will not and cannot mask a high handicappers swing faults, but it will help fine tune a repetitive, consistent swing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by Beachcomber

What shaft did you go with?


I went with the stock stiff Phenom 60.  I hit the TP Phenom 65 and threw in my Fubuki 63.  The high kick point on the Phenom 65 was no good for me, my Fubuki 63 was pretty good but spin rates were still best with the Phenom 60.  I could only hit the G20 with the stock stiff TFC 169D.  The RBZ I tried a couple different shafts but it made no difference for me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by ajohnson161

I went with the stock stiff Phenom 60.  I hit the TP Phenom 65 and threw in my Fubuki 63.  The high kick point on the Phenom 65 was no good for me, my Fubuki 63 was pretty good but spin rates were still best with the Phenom 60.  I could only hit the G20 with the stock stiff TFC 169D.  The RBZ I tried a couple different shafts but it made no difference for me.



Good stuff.  Thanks for the response.  I have the R11 TP from 2011... I'm going to go back and hit the R11S side by side with the same shafts and compare it on the Trackman.  The problem with the R11S I was hitting last Friday on the release date was it was a 10.5*... I want to try it with a 9*, but my guy didn't have it in stock on the release date.  And I didn't do a side by side comparison with my R11.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • How do I organize a charity tournament to be a raging success?
      26 and a stroke? Holy smokes. Very sorry to hear that.  I have no idea how to organize a tournament but I have played in my share. The best ones are scrambles where you can organize your own team. The outcome has rarely ever mattered to us as long as we were well fed. Find a local restaurant (usually a bbq place) that wants to help you out and give a discount for advertising and spend your money there. Everyone will love to come for a good meal. Some nice prizes and maybe a raffle with some local companies offering you something if you are able to convince them it is worth it to give something to the cause.  Another thing I have seen work well is a silent auction at the end with donated items. I donated airline miles of which I have tons and 100,000 miles went for $205. Free gift for me and the cause got $205. 
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Haha - I get a couple of reputation points for a post and then go and have a blow up hole. Good drive, left myself 145 in down hill (8i), aimed #deadcenter, pulled 2 shots 25 yards left out of bounds, made 9 (+5) in a 9 hole round of (+11). A better way to avoid blow up holes - play stableford!
    • Donald Trump for president?
      Come on now, that's a bit uncalled for in Bernies case.  His political ideals might be way left, but he is at least honest and virtuous.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I'll have to examine your other post closer. That's a good point to consider about the expansion to Continental Europe. Largely explains the poor showing of UK & Ireland in the 60's with many top tier European players not eligible. But considering the 200 million U.S. population base to 63 million in the U.K. & Ireland at the time, the latter did surprisingly well if population base was all that matters. IMO an established competitive golfing culture matters in producing elite players too. Those same European players excluded from Ryder Cup were always eligible for the Majors. The Ryder Cup is also a limited field event. It concentrates the 12 top players of the European Tour. From what I've read, depth of field is still stronger for the 'typical' PGA event, though some non-major Euro events are now stronger than some of the 'minor' PGA events. That is a significant change in Euro competitiveness from the 60's. To some extent that 30% drop sounds like it could be due to simply more international players occupying slots in the fields. If the period you mention covers when majors started to use OWGR for automatic qualification that has some not insignificant inherent issues in terms of strength of field. Having a guaranteed start rather than having to qualify would certainly make for an easier decision to travel to the event. But I'm not arguing against the policy decision facilitating international competition with a little points boost just trying to point out that field strength may not have been as weak in Jack's day as you seem to think. Compared to his peers, which is really the only thing I think you can do without speculative nuance I agree there's no question he's the best golfer. I'm really just arguing that standouts of their caliber (so many more wins so many more majors) than typical players among already elite fields are so rare, that I expect they both represent near the achievable human pinnacle in golf talent, which I don't think really differs within a few generations. The nuances of comparison across eras is interesting to me so I'll debate relative points, but I'm against arguments undervaluing Jack's achievements against 'weak fields'. They both faced very stiff competition.   I'm not dissing Jack. I think his achievements are amazing. I also think the same of Tiger's record. IMO winning percentage per start in the Majors is a very significant stat and Tiger has that in his favor (they are both top 10 and within ~ 2% of each other's number). That number is not the official one for Jack though, I truncated his Major starts to end at age 47, which I think is a reasonable cutoff for competitiveness. If Tiger competes as long as Jack did his major win % (up to age 47) might stay about the same, increase, or decrease (more likely), but he certainly won't match the 18 Majors if he doesn't get like 22+ more major starts between now and age 47.
    • Wedges, Bounce, and Ground Conditions
      Typically more bounce (or a "healthy" amount of bounce) helps in any condition.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. glinks
      glinks
      (43 years old)
  • Blog Entries