Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Clandestine

Project X Flighted shafts.

20 posts in this topic

Hi,

I had a fitting for some Razr X Forged clubs yesterday and was curious about the shaft weights. The guy has ordered me the Project X 5.0's, but a little research has shown that these are the lightest on offer for the Forged clubs (Callaway's website).

He didn't do a swing speed test and was judging the required shaft by how far I was hitting the ball, I assume at least. My distances are:

PW: 130
9: 140
8: 150
7: 160
6: 170

I'm probably worrying about nothing, but people with similar distances seem to be going for the 5.5 rather than the 5.0. What are the real term benefits/disadvantages between the two shaft weights? As in will I be likely to fade/draw the ball more with the 5.0, will the ball flight be higher etc. The Royal Precision site recommended that I go for the Dynamic Gold XP S 300.

Cheers in advance,

Matt.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Just my Analytical 2 cents... your over thinking steel

TG's are manufactured to an amazing standard, no idea what project x does...

When changing my grips an annoying thing i like to do with TG's is run a rag along the length of the club without the grip off.... It creates the most high pitched chalk board scratch sound that i love... Sound is being transmitted harmoniously and evenly...like a crystal wine glass, try it some time. Cheap shafts dont do that (in grip changing). Other then that its all about determining the minute and insignificant 0.0001 differences in manufacturing that make advertisers claim it will change your game...

Once again my 2 cents, with 4 Guiness opinion....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the input. However, this is the first non game improving iron that i've purchased and I have no intention of changing it for years, so I'd quite like to make sure it's my "perfect" fit from the off.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by Clandestine

He didn't do a swing speed test and was judging the required shaft by how far I was hitting the ball, I assume at least. My distances are:

PW: 130

9: 140

8: 150

7: 160

6: 170

I'm probably worrying about nothing, but people with similar distances seem to be going for the 5.5 rather than the 5.0. What are the real term benefits/disadvantages between the two shaft weights? As in will I be likely to fade/draw the ball more with the 5.0, will the ball flight be higher etc. The Royal Precision site recommended that I go for the Dynamic Gold XP S 300.

Cheers in advance,

Matt.


You need a swing speed test.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based upon your distance numbers, I would think that your swing is better matched for 5.5 or 6.0.

Having said that, I would highly recommend the Dynamic Gold in an S100 or S300. No need to spend the extra money for the Rifles, unless money is no object and your handicap is <1.

A 16 handicap is not going to gain any benefit or see any difference from a Rifle compared to the Dynamic Gold. In fact more PGA tour pros are using the Dynamic Gold than any other iron shaft by a long shot.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A swing-speed test would have been nice.

Note, however, that PX shafts tend to rate quite stiff compared to other shafts in a given "flex" rating (R or S). One way of comparing shafts across product lines is the FCM (frequency coefficient matching) measurement.

Some comparisons (borrowed from a Sand Trap table posted earlier this month; I'll post link to full table - source GolfWRX.com - later if I can find it):

Shaft Rating FCM
PX 5.0* Regular 5.5
PX 5.5 R-S 6.0
PX 5.0 hardstep R-S 5.9
PX 6.0 Stiff 6.5
DG R300 Regular 4.8
DG S300 Stiff 5.8
KBS Tour R Regular 5.0
KBS Tour S Stiff 6.0

You could consider DG S300 if you want to keep the ball lower. Or, if you like the flighting on the PX shafts, you might hardstep them (you'd only have to buy one more shaft). If you go with DG, you could probably get some money back by selling the PX pullouts.

PX 6.0 evidently is quite stiff. Lots irons on Callaway-Preowned are shafted in PX 6.0,

*Note: You should contact someone who's an expert on shafts to make sure the FCM rating on all PX 5.0 (plain, rifle, or rifle-flighted) are the same.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I was hitting DG S300's and PX 6.0 Flighted side by side on the driving range yesterday.  Hitting a 9 iron with the S300, my shots were all low fades, with the PX 6.0 Flighted, they were consistent high baby draws.  I decided on the PX's, but I am going with the 5.5's and my distances are the same as yours.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by Bullitt5339

I was hitting DG S300's and PX 6.0 Flighted side by side on the driving range yesterday.  Hitting a 9 iron with the S300, my shots were all low fades, with the PX 6.0 Flighted, they were consistent high baby draws.  I decided on the PX's, but I am going with the 5.5's and my distances are the same as yours.



What model iron were you hitting with each club? Was it the same?

Generally, all things being equal, a stiffer shaft and/or higher kick point would tend to make your shot go right and lower. Conversely, again all other factors being equal, a more flexible shaft with a lower kick point, would tend to flight the ball higher and make it easier to hit a draw.

So your results are a little surprising. The 6.0 is virtually the same stiffness as the S300. And, the 6.0 flighted have what is called a variable kick point depending on the iron. shorter irons have actually a higher KP to flight the ball lower as compared to the longer irons like a 4 iron where they move the KP down to allow a higher flight.

The S300 all have a consistent high KP for a low trajectory.

So if you were hitting a 5 Iron and got those results I could understand it, but with a 9 iron it seems that the shafts wouldn't, by themselves, produce your results.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My Swing Speed is between 87 - 90 mph and I was recommended the Project X 5.0 for my Driver and irons by my golfTec Instructor.

My 6 iron is 145 - 155

My 7 iron is 135 - 145

I don't see how you can use the X 5.0 if your getting 170 from your 6 iron, unless your 6 iron is actually a 5......check your lofts.

My 6 is at 27* and my 7 is at 31*.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they were both Callaway X-Forged.  Decent irons, nice feel, but I'm going to stick with my MP 57's for a long time.  I just want a higher ball flight now that my swing speed has slowed way down, so the S300's have to go.  I can't even get my 6 iron up in the air with my current swing speed.

Originally Posted by szaino

What model iron were you hitting with each club? Was it the same?

Generally, all things being equal, a stiffer shaft and/or higher kick point would tend to make your shot go right and lower. Conversely, again all other factors being equal, a more flexible shaft with a lower kick point, would tend to flight the ball higher and make it easier to hit a draw.

So your results are a little surprising. The 6.0 is virtually the same stiffness as the S300. And, the 6.0 flighted have what is called a variable kick point depending on the iron. shorter irons have actually a higher KP to flight the ball lower as compared to the longer irons like a 4 iron where they move the KP down to allow a higher flight.

The S300 all have a consistent high KP for a low trajectory.

So if you were hitting a 5 Iron and got those results I could understand it, but with a 9 iron it seems that the shafts wouldn't, by themselves, produce your results.



0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I made the mistake, last year, of going from Project x 5.0 to KBS stiff. I knew in my head I shouldn't have but was talked into it

based on the fact I hit my six iron 175. That isn't the ONLY thing you should be basing your choice on.

The Project X 5.0 are greatv shafts... even when my driver swing speed was up there 115 and I used a stiff driver shaft I still used the PX 5.0 iron shafts. I've recently sold my set of Razr X Tour with the KBS shafts and am going back to the Project X 5.0.

The KBS shafts were eventually softstepped but still wasn't to my liking. I went from 175-178 with my 6 iron to about 160 with stiffer shafts. The shot dispersion was tight, but at my age, I will be losing distance soon enough.

What you should do is go to a shop that will set up the club for you with the PX 5.0 shaft in it and 5.5 and hit them on a simulator.

If you get the PX 5.5 and then dn't like them you can have the pro shop soft step them once or twice...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

What model iron were you hitting with each club? Was it the same?

Generally, all things being equal, a stiffer shaft and/or higher kick point would tend to make your shot go right and lower. Conversely, again all other factors being equal, a more flexible shaft with a lower kick point, would tend to flight the ball higher and make it easier to hit a draw.

So your results are a little surprising. The 6.0 is virtually the same stiffness as the S300. And, the 6.0 flighted have what is called a variable kick point depending on the iron. shorter irons have actually a higher KP to flight the ball lower as compared to the longer irons like a 4 iron where they move the KP down to allow a higher flight.

The S300 all have a consistent high KP for a low trajectory.

So if you were hitting a 5 Iron and got those results I could understand it, but with a 9 iron it seems that the shafts wouldn't, by themselves, produce your results.


This updated GolfWRX.com FCM table - courtesy of Howard Jones, suggests the PX 6.0 (FCM 6.5) is a half-flex stiffer than the S300 (FCM 5.8). In golf shops, I see a lot of 6.0 pullouts for sale, and there's always plenty of irons for sale on Callaway Pre-O with 6.0 shafts.

FCM_chart_TTPxKbs.jpg

Otherwise, sziano nails it on his analysis. Especially good job of explaining flighted shafts.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I was mistaken, went back today to make sure of what I was hitting, and they were PX 6.0HL's, not flighted.  My mistake.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clandestine,

Rallph Maltby's GolfWorks operation, besides its MPF for iron heads, puts out a playability rating for different shafts.

The PX 5.0 is rated as 3B2M . Same rating as PX 5.0 Flighted, Rifle 5.0, and Rifle 5.0 Flighted

3: 150 yd. iron = 6i/ Driver = 82-93 MPH ( Flex code)

B: Both control and distance sought

2: medium trajectory

M: no hook or slice correction

PX 6.0 and Rifle 6.0 are rated as 4B1M. (150 yd. 7i, Driver 94-105 MPH // Low trajectory)

PX 6.0 Flighted and Tour Rifle 6.0 Flighted are rated as 4B2M. (150 yd. 7i, Driver 94-105 MPH // medium trajectory)

If you have a 150 yd. 8i, and Driver -106 MPH+, you might look at the 6.5 shafts. But, make sure you really have this distance,, because the PX / Rifle family are stiffer than the average "Stiff" shafts. Only your launch monitor knows for sure (assuming it's properly calibrated)

Whatever works... just some thoughts.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by Bullitt5339

I was mistaken, went back today to make sure of what I was hitting, and they were PX 6.0HL's, not flighted.  My mistake.



The HL stands for "high launch" shaft and this now explains the results that you got. Good thing you double checked, make sure the order was for the proper HL shaft if that is what you want.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am an 8 handicap and my next irons will be the MP-53. I have struggled with this decision myself. Then I hit the Project X and S300. I felt like I was hitting rocks with the Project X. While the S300 was like hitting a pure shot over and over again. It's just my opinion but project x shafts are overrated. You have to hit them absolutely pure every time to get a good shot. I know that's not going to happen so forgiveness is always welcome.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by jonwil

Jakester,

Were your 5.0 shafts the 'Flighted' or the regular Project X?



My X 20 Tours were HL high launch... my new set of Razr X tours are flighted, which I believe are similar...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • http://www.athleticgreensfacts.com/lift-x/
      Product is and will remain the rule! Camouflage Products Use camouflage products with a creamy formula: liquid, light and the same color as your skin, and preferably with a moisturizing ingredient like hyaluronic acid. Do not make   lift x  the mistake to make skin lighter under your eyes than the rest of your face. You accentuate this problem area than correct. For bluish circles under the eyes (blue color is often.... http://www.athleticgreensfacts.com/lift-x/  
    • http://www.optimalnutritions.com/vitapulse
      Either be born with congenital heart diseases or the condition may develop over the years as they age It is very difficult to tell whether your pet cat may be suffering from heart problems unless examined by a vet All that we can Vitapulse  do is to keep a look out for unusual or sudden changes in behavior What may be causing the heart failure will not be known until a thorough checkup is carried VitaPulse Reviews  out However if the cat has been diagnosed with underlying conditions such as feline diabetes thyroid malfunction or anemia the chances of heart problems to occur increase substantially Causes of Feline Congestive Heart Failure Congestive heart failure is the condition wherein the cats heart gradually weakens thus being unable to . http://www.optimalnutritions.com/vitapulse
    • Open this > > > http://www.tophealthbuy.com/juvalux-eye-serum-scam
      JuvaLux Eye Serum Regular massage treatments can help you physically and mentally. Massages help with blood flow and ridding your body of waste and toxins. Make it a habit to get a massage from time to time and get these benefits for yourself. Open this >>> http://www.tophealthbuy.com/juvalux-eye-serum-scam
    • all set to be competent
      will maximized gently and that you just comfortably effortlessly'd be competent to be equipped to be capable to be in a position to be in a position to be all set to be competent to be Beard Czar all set to be capable to be all set to be all set to be all Beard Czar set to Viatropin  overview Viatropin  overview capabilities further in mattress with Alpha F1 complement  Alpha F1 complement accomplice. Beard Czar stories In Megadrox  Zynev addition ProShred Megadrox Elite they Megadrox Testadrox Alpha Man unhazardous experiences promise that LifeForce T-2000 will makes Megadrox rip-off you do not Megadrox prepared to be prepared to be competent to  Zynev Crevalor  indubitably emerge as all set to participate in such excessive- http://drozforskolin.org/beard-czar-reviews/
    • alternatives inside the well being
      alternatives inside the well being university, launches a manufacturer new digestive and immune Beard Czar  product Probiotic   Viatropin  evaluation Probiotic American American that entails newly realized traces of micro organism worthwhile to more than a few wellness issues. It has a difficult technique to alleviate digestive problems and toughen whole physique wellbeing.An educated health practitioner and wellness advised who studied comfort on the tutoring of California, perfect Biotics is a gut yeast complement that has the capabilities to absorb diet and minerals safely, fight off infections and strengthen healthful digestion," experiences James.When requested involving the selections of excellent Biotics, Dr. Cary outlined, "There are two types of micro organism decided all through the digestive tract, hazardous micro organism and worthy micro organism.  http://drozforskolin.org/beard-czar-reviews/
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries