• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Bflem55

Drills or Fundamentals for getting use to new irons

11 posts in this topic

Hell all I am a 12 handicap and I had a set of king cobra 2 irons for over 10 years.  I just got fitted and bought a new set of TM 2.0 burner irons. I have hit them twice off grass and once off mats in the past week.  I have been getting a little frustrated with my distances with the new clubs.  I am a long ball hitter with my old clubs I was hitting a 5 iron 190 and 8 iron 150.  With the new clubs so far I am only getting 175 - 180 out of the 5 iron and maybe 130-150 with the 8 iron.  Is it possible that I could hit a little shorter with the new clubs?  Are there some drills or things I can try to do to get more familiar with the new irons?  Thank you

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

How different are the shafts?  Both sets are stiff?  Surprised the old ones go further

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

name is paul, i am a 11 hdcp, i recommend practice swing with swing weights. swing with the club heavier will help you adjust to the weight change. it sounds strange but i use 3 different sets in 3 months, just to change up and challenge myself, i have also changed my swing 3 times in 6 months. challenge your.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never really had that problem... Maybe your new clubs are long, so your hitting it on the heel more. I had issues with that for a bit when i change, but i never saw a drop off. Go find your old clubs length and loft, and then check out your new clubs. a 3 iron from one club isn't a 3 iron from another. I have seen 3 irons that were 18 degrees with one set and near 22 with another. 4 degrees is alot of difference..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Have you tried impact tape to see where you're actually impacting the ball on the club face. How do the shafts compare ? Not just flex, but weight. Do the 2.0's have a heavier shaft? Did you happen to get the uniflex shaft ? I tried a set of Clevelands with the uniflex shaft and they didn't work at all. Loss of distance was one of the issues..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't taped them but I did actually notice from ball marks that I am hitting more off of the toe. I may have solved the problem though I was addressing the ball dead center to the club. I noticed if I address the ball more closer to the heal that I hit it pretty good with no complaints. I can't really tell if the shafts are heavier though. I was analyzed 2 times by two dif. PGA guys and they said the stiff shafts is for sure what I need.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are 2 tables I found that have my club specs if anyone could look at them and let me know what they think I would greatly appreciate it.  The first link is my burners I have now the 2nd are my old clubs.  Thank you guys

http://www.taylormadegolf.com/products/irons/Burner-2.0-irons/product-detail-specifications

http://www.golfclubspec.com/iron_results.php?id=51

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the lofts are stronger on the new set you have.  the loss of distance must be somewhere else.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

So I'm still taking a huge divot and I have lost 10 to 20 yard per club!!! Golf galaxy says I test out on all the specs for stiff shafts. I am outraged can I not swing regular shafts with a 89 mph swing
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bflem55,

Some things to consider...

* Burners are D3.5 swingweight, KingCs are only D1 according to spec sheets. Any chance the Burners feel heavier, and you're not used to them yet?

* Have you been able to hit balls this winter? If you haven't been playing for 6-8 weeks, your swing muscles may be a little out of shape.

* According to Ralph Maltby's 2011 MPF update for irons, the Burner 2.0 has "C Dimension" of 1.425" ... C dimension is measured from the center of the hosel to the club's Horizontal Center of Gravity. Measure the clubface, and see where the HCoG is located. If it's toward the heel, your alignment adjustment may help things out. For help on this, find a clubsmith who understands basics of Maltby's MPF measurements.

------------------

General new irons tip: If you have square floor tiles somewhere in your house, use them to check the alignment of your irons. When I switched to irons with slightly offset than the old ones, the squares showed me that I was closing the face slightly on my set-up. Use the squares to help you see what the clubface looks like at square alignment. It may take a couple of days to retrain your eye for what "square up" looks like with your new Burners.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I started hitting balls in the past 3 weeks and I live in Ohio so I haven't golfed since last September. I did read Ben hogans fundamental book and did change my swing a little but I'm pretty sure it is definelty for the better.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      No problem.  I'm not tired of responding to sincere and thoughtful posts, like yours, even if it rehashes stuff from before because OF COURSE it is unrealistic to expect people to read 3000 posts before commenting.  In any case I have that quote in a file and it was simple to post it - much simpler and politer than saying "go find it , it's here."  I DO think that one should maybe at least read a smattering of such a big thread before jumping in,   But I have no patience whatsoever with the "I saw Jack play" and "he was nice at a clinic" type posts or posts by people who try to claim some special credibility because of some entirely personal subjective connection.  But that isn't you. As to the rest, you asked for the exact quote and I gave it to you.  If you want to argue with what he said, that is another matter and does not concern me, since my position is that even if we, arguendo, say that the field strengths did NOT get better, Tiger's career was so much more dominant than Jack's that it doesn't matter.  I don't NEED to make a stronger field argument to make the case that Tiger dominated golf in a way and to an extent that no other golfer has ever dominated golf.  And he did it for 15 years (after an absolutely unprecedented career as an amateur) which, IMO, is long enough that it no longevity argument could overcome the sheer dominance advantage his career embodied.   The fact that all that is true in the face of field strength increasing is just icing on the cake.   
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Excellent. Thank you for re-posting that quote. Sorry to hear you're tired of rehashing. Why not just let the thread die then? Is the expectation that folks will read all 272 pages before making a comment? That strikes me as an unrealistic expectation.. I agree the tour is tougher than it used to be. I consider the differences more incremental than astronomical...not the 'order of magnitude' range that seems to come through in some comments. I think Jack is both being accurate in assessing his perception of a shift in quality, but also exaggerating for effect or experiencing present-day myopia at the very least about the money. $100 in 1962 money would be ~ $800 dollars today. Not exactly what I would call bus fare. The 'paltry' $100,000 had the buying power of about $800,000 in today's dollars, which is ~ 60% of today's average purse and ~ 30% of the Players' purse).. Most Americans would happily take an annual salary like that today. They weren't getting ditch digger wages. The prize money even then definitely attracted keen competitive interest. Clearly purses have also grown more than inflation and even journeyman make more in a year than the top 10 in 1962 (below), but it seems about in line with the growth of the population of golfers in the U.S. itself - about triple since Jack's day, Endorsement money has definitely gotten bigger, as the tour and the golf marketplace have developed and expanded over time.   Rank       Player                  1962 $                   2015 $ 1            Arnold Palmer        $81,448                 $639,223 2            Gene Littler           $66,201                 $519,562 3            Jack Nicklaus         $61,869                 $485,563 4            Billy Casper            $61,842                 $485,351 5            Bob Goalby            $46,241                 $362,910 6            Gary Player            $45,838                 $359,748 7            Doug Sanders        $43,340                 $340,143 8            Dave Ragan          $37,327                 $292,951 9            Bobby Nichols       $34,312                 $269,288 10          Phil Rodgers          $32,182                 $252,572  
    • Claim Your Achievements Here!
      Broke par, Lowest Score Wins. 
    • Disadvantage of too stiff a flex?
      I've often thought about going with an X flex driver shaft.  I may get an adapter from My Titleist 910 and experiment.
    • Claim Your Achievements Here!
      I'd like to claim the "Broke 80" award, as I managed this for the first time December 28th last year.   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 OUT Gross 5 4 4 5 5 3 5 5 5 41(41) Par 4 4 3 5 4 3 4 4 5 36 Distance 353 357 168 465 312 142 389 339 492 3017 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 IN TOTAL 5 4 4 4 5 3 5 4 4 38(38) 79 (79) 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 35 71 479 356 323 355 396 185 309 136 365 2904 5921               Thanks!        
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. TessaEdin
      TessaEdin
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries