Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jestep

Smaller head driver suggestions???

25 posts in this topic

I currently drive with an older Taylor 3 wood. I still hit around 275 off the tee, but I'm looking for a driver with a smaller head like a 3 wood. I can hit a driver well, but I really don't like swinging a 460cc (brick on a stick ) driver. I like a less resistant faster swing that I cannot get with a 460cc driver. Does anyone still make 360'ish drivers in the 9 - 10 degree range? Have always like Taylor drivers, ever since the original Burner Bubble's came out. Seems like all the shops only have extremely large headed drivers nowadays.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I currently drive with an older Taylor 3 wood. I still hit around 275 off the tee, but I'm looking for a driver with a smaller head like a 3 wood. I can hit a driver well, but I really don't like swinging a 460cc (brick on a stick ) driver. I like a less resistant faster swing that I cannot get with a 460cc driver. Does anyone still make 360'ish drivers in the 9 - 10 degree range? Have always like Taylor drivers, ever since the original Burner Bubble's came out. Seems like all the shops only have extremely large headed drivers nowadays.

Have you considered a vintage (like 2005-2008) head and an upgraded shaft? If you can hit a 3-wood 275, then even an older head with the right shaft should be in the 290-295 range easily.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll take a look at some of the older models. I guess it's just me because there's pretty much zero new drivers that I can find under 450cc. Does anyone know if the 360XD was the last Taylomade 360cc driver?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the same problem. I can hit my 3 wood great, but I can't hit my driver to save my life. A friend let me borrow his Callaway Big Bertha War Bird driver (190 cc) and I hit that pretty good. They are also not that expensive. If you take your time and look, you can find them for around $10-15 used. You could find Callaways, Taylormade, Titleist, etc in the smaller heads and they are made of steel.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason why you might hit it better may not be to do with the head size.  After all a three wood is shorter more forgiving and has more loft making it much easier to hit.  If you can hit a 3 wood that far you should have no trouble hitting a driver further because you have to be hitting your 3 wood well to do that.  The chances are more like you are using a wrongly fitted driver.  So id recommend getting fitted.  There will be little difference in an older smaller headed driver than a 460cc because although they are bigger they are somewhat lighter as well. Why not try going for a last generation driver with a 400 cc head or try a 3 wood with a much stronger loft.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you hit the center of the clubface, i doubt it matters what the size of clubface is, if it can be designed with a COR near 0.830 at the center.

I have a 975D Titleist driver thats 9.5 degrees of loft. I doubt i could get it reshafted, but it has an EI-70 shaft in it, and awesome club.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

320cc and 360cc, available from 6° to 16°:

http://www.banggolf.com/prodgroup.asp?id=W320

http://www.banggolf.com/prodgroup.asp?id=W360

Bang is an OED, not a clone company.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by broombroom

The reason why you might hit it better may not be to do with the head size.  After all a three wood is shorter more forgiving and has more loft making it much easier to hit.  If you can hit a 3 wood that far you should have no trouble hitting a driver further because you have to be hitting your 3 wood well to do that.


I've used/demoed new Cleveland launchers, the Nike square thing, a ping, a new Callaway, and a few others. I can hit them, but the feel of swinging a huge blob of metal just doesn't work. I may try custom fitting, as this could definitely help me rule out fitment issues. I may just be picky here since this is more of feel issue than anything else, but I like a club that feels good to swing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by glock35ipsc

320cc and 360cc, available from 6° to 16°:

http://www.banggolf.com/prodgroup.asp?id=W320

http://www.banggolf.com/prodgroup.asp?id=W360

Bang is an OED, not a clone company.

I'll check them out. I did find several 320 and 360 Taylormade drivers on ebay for about $20, so I may just get one of those and run up to golfsmith for a new shaft and grip. I can get it correctly fitted at the same time which seems the most reasonable path.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by jestep

Quote:

Originally Posted by glock35ipsc

320cc and 360cc, available from 6° to 16°:

http://www.banggolf.com/prodgroup.asp?id=W320

http://www.banggolf.com/prodgroup.asp?id=W360

Bang is an OED, not a clone company.

I'll check them out. I did find several 320 and 360 Taylormade drivers on ebay for about $20, so I may just get one of those and run up to golfsmith for a new shaft and grip. I can get it correctly fitted at the same time which seems the most reasonable path.



BTW not every 460 driver looks the same at address. I'm biased, but better players drivers tend to look smaller at adress than game improvement drivers. My MP600 looks tiny at address compared to a G15 for example but they're both 460cc I think.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really small but my nike vr driver (tour edition maybe?) is 420 cc, but it looks much smaller than many of the 460 cc drivers out there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shaft length is an issue for me; I used to think my driver was oversized and unwieldy, but it was actually 420cc and just had a soft 45" shaft. Cutting it down to 44 or 44.5" and getting a stable shaft can make it feel controlled. Most of the drivers on the market range from 45.5 to 46.5 inches. Next time you swing a driver, choke up 2 inches.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Take your pick of any Callaway  pre 2004. BB 04 version, BB II, Steelhead, Hawkeye and all the 1990's originals are fantastic AND CHEAP as all get out. You can buy 90's versions for less than 10 dollars at my local used sporting goods store. You just need a steadier head position through impact to get a good impact being that they are smaller.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sldr mini driver. It is 260 cc, and performs great. Tried it on the range once, its awesome. Only downside is that you cant hit it off the deck

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sldr mini driver. It is 260 cc, and performs great. Tried it on the range once, its awesome. Only downside is that you cant hit it off the deck

+1

I bought a SLDR Mini Driver and it's my best purchase in years. Practically the same distance as my driver, much more control and very easy to hit because of it's larger face and 43.5 inch shaft.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with you. I have tried every 460cc driver out there and still come back to my $1.50 Titleist 975J I bought at Goodwill. Easier to control and goes just as far. I think Tiger needs to go back to his old smaller head driver.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on how much smaller you want.  TM has a 430cc SLDR and Titleist 915D3 is 440cc.   If you want something the size of the TM SLDR Mini take a look at the Callaway X2Hot Deep or the yet to be released XR Deep

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Go on ebay and scoop up a Titleist 983E or Great Big Bertha II and thank me later. There are a lot of different shaft and loft options still floating around and almost all in the $20-$40 range

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • What'd You Shoot Today?
      Played 9 holes today and started out pretty good (for me) w/ 5 bogies in a row, then doubled the last four. Still, not a bad round.  
    • Anyone Else Use 'Good Shots' to Measure How Good a Round Was?
      This is what I do as well.  If I play a poor round then there are a lot of these, so I don't really dwell too much, but if I played a good round, then it frequently boiled down to a couple of really good to great shots, a whole bunch of manageable ones, and a couple awful ones.  The awful ones are the ones I feel should be entirely avoidable, so those are the ones I try and recount later and assess what went wrong.
    • My Swing (PumaAttack)
      I have been working with an Evolvr coach for a while and he has not addressed those concerns at a2 and in fact called my position a perfect example and something he would show to other students.  So your instructions do not match up for me.   It is frustrating to hear you make comments like that when they don't match up with what my coach says.   I still don't get why it matters if it goes from shallow to slightly steeper on the downswing.   Look at Furyks swing, is he hitting all the key positions?  If I hit A5 to A6 why does A3 matter anymore? If Robert Rock had the same angle at 5 as he does at 3 he would miss the ball too..  What is the difference in steep to shallow?  OR shallow to steep, but still outside the ball?  
    • Anyone Else Use 'Good Shots' to Measure How Good a Round Was?
      No because it's pretty rare I hit a really good shot. Many are happy accidents. Good is relative to par for me. If I gave myself a chance it's a decent shot. But most don't end up as I conceived it in my mind and I know that in my planning that it's a big target. I think in certain areas, miss right to get up and down if I know going for the green brings trouble into play. If it ends up right of the green and leaves me a pitch uphill it's good whether I hit it to my number for that club or chunk it 15 yards short.
    • My Swing (PumaAttack)
      @pumaAttack I didn't tell you to "model" your swing after Ko's, I was giving you an example of someone that is doing the opposite of what you're doing. Face looking "down" at 2, standing the shaft up at 3, this will make the shallowing move a lot more natural.  Exactly, you have to consider the entire motion. When the swing goes "shallow to steep" consistency is going to be hard to achieve because of the compensations you have to make with the sweetspot. Yes at 6 you may be pointing the shaft outside the ball but it's also steeper than you were at 3, these things matter. If you had the same shaft alignment at 5 that you do at 3 you'd miss the ball, so you in order to make contact you have to steepen the shaft. While the shaft is still outside the ball at 5 the sweetspot is going to move differently than if you were "steep to shallow". @pumaAttack I wasn't aware that you were still on Evolvr or that they had already made recommendations, I'm sure your instructor has mentioned the backswing and that it's part of their gameplan to address it. I was just trying to help, you mentioned you are trying to shallow the shaft on the downswing, I saw where you were on the downswing so I figured I'd post.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bigtosh90
      bigtosh90
      (26 years old)
    2. dopplegvnger
      dopplegvnger
      (24 years old)
    3. Frank62
      Frank62
      (54 years old)
  • Blog Entries