Jump to content
IGNORED

Melky should be banned from baseball


bamagrad03
Note: This thread is 4255 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I already dislike the guy. He has a crappy work ethic, terrible attitude, and has shown to be completely disrespectful of the game on many occasions.

However, this crap about setting up a fake website to deceive MLB takes the cake. All of it on the heels of him having to cheat to turn in his best season as a pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I always liked Melky and was really happy to see him playing well, but I tend to agree.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

His 50 game punishment is fair for the PED use.  And after I heard what he had to say originally, I thought it was commendable and admirable.  He admitted it, rather than back down or make an excuse.  But ...

Now we find out that was only AFTER he came up with a hare-brained cover-up attempt?

Certainly there needs to be some extra punishment for that, no?  Banning him is probably a tad harsh, but, I agree that something on top of the 50 games needs to be added for that stunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think the PED's issue is completely overblown by the media.  That said, these are the rules MLB and the MLBPA agreed to so Melky should serve the 50 game suspension and then at least all of next season for the attempted cover up.  Banning is a bit severe as I believe their CBA is pretty clear on what is and isn't a bannable offense.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As a Giants fan (see avatar), I do agree that Melky deserved the 50 game suspension and probably more for his attempted cover up. Banning is still pretty harsh especially when the players are working in a system where Bud Selig's drug testing program isn't as cut up as it should be. Melky was just dumb enough to get caught.

It's very disappointing how this came up especially after making a name for himself in his first year as a Giant. But it's also good to see younger unknowns like Brandon Belt and Crawford start to step up and get some hits when it matters balancing out the line up. We're at least in the playoff hunt and the next series against the Dodgers will be a determining one for the NL West title, IMO.

Best Regards,
Ryan

In the :ogio: bag:
:nike: VR-S Covert Tour Driver 10.5 :nike: VR-S Covert Tour 3W :titleist: 712U 21*
:nike: VR Pro Blades 4-PW :vokey: Vokeys 52*, 56* & 60* :scotty_cameron: Studio Select Newport 2
:leupold:
:true_linkswear: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The PED part, and the 50 game ban, I'm fine with. But the fact that he lied and created such a huge scheme to try and cover it up - it's borderline obstruction of justice.

For that 2nd part, he should receive a lifetime ban IMO. It's much, much worse than the PED rule he broke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

50 for the PEDS, 100 for the attempted cover-up. Banning is AWFULLY severe.

But this is basically a first and second offense rolled into one. He took drugs, then lied and tried to cover it up.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I agree with this.

On another note, I'm glad SF still has good pitching and the other players are producing hits. Last night's game against the Dodgers was an example of that.

Originally Posted by iacas

50 for the PEDS, 100 for the attempted cover-up. Banning is AWFULLY severe.

But this is basically a first and second offense rolled into one. He took drugs, then lied and tried to cover it up.

Best Regards,
Ryan

In the :ogio: bag:
:nike: VR-S Covert Tour Driver 10.5 :nike: VR-S Covert Tour 3W :titleist: 712U 21*
:nike: VR Pro Blades 4-PW :vokey: Vokeys 52*, 56* & 60* :scotty_cameron: Studio Select Newport 2
:leupold:
:true_linkswear: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

When USC bought Reggie Bush's mother a house so that he would play for them instead of Notre Dame, he had to give back his trophy and USC had to forfeit games and championships.

SF on the other hand got 100 games of a all-star caliber play, first place, and hadn't given him a new contract yet.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

All sports are playing games when it comes to PED's.  If you want to truly rid your sport of them, make the penalties tougher, like a half season suspension for the first offense and permanent ban for the second.  Fine the teams for any player that tests positive and make the teams illegible for post season play.  Rules like that would get PED's out of sports but no one really wants PED's out of sports, they just want the appearance to seem like they do.

Same thing with DWI, want to discourage people from DWI make it a mandatory 10 year prison sentence first time they do it, 25 years the 2nd time.  I doubt we'd have as many DWI's if people knew they'd serve 10 years regardless of how good a lawyer they had.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by newtogolf

All sports are playing games when it comes to PED's.  If you want to truly rid your sport of them, make the penalties tougher, ....

I disagree.  That was true prior to 1987 for the NFL, and 1998 for the MLB.  They are pretty tough now.  25% of your season including salary for first offense in football, right?  And it looks like a full season suspension for a second offense and, according to Wikipedia, the penalty for a third offense is not specified because its never happened.  For baseball, its 31% of a season, then 62%, then 100% ... presumably all without pay.  Those seem pretty severe to me.

I would think that if those suspensions aren't enough of a detterent, then nothing will be.

(I didn't look up the NBA's policy but I figure that they have no problems with steroids because the bacne would be obvious in those tank tops)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

We can disagree, nothing wrong with that.  I'd also point out that baseball doesn't test for HGH, as HGH requires a blood test and the Players Association has to date refused to agree to blood testing.

Also as someone that's been around steroids and HGH, it's pretty easy to beat the tests if you know when the tests are being conducted.  Random and frequent testing is the only certain way to catch offenders.  In baseball the testing isn't random, it's scheduled, which means players have sufficient time to clean their system before the test.  If baseball and the players really want to get rid of PEDS, it's within their power to do so.  The current process is a lame attempt at testing and done more to appease congress than rid the sport of PEDS IMO.

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

I disagree.  That was true prior to 1987 for the NFL, and 1998 for the MLB.  They are pretty tough now.  25% of your season including salary for first offense in football, right?  And it looks like a full season suspension for a second offense and, according to Wikipedia, the penalty for a third offense is not specified because its never happened.  For baseball, its 31% of a season, then 62%, then 100% ... presumably all without pay.  Those seem pretty severe to me.

I would think that if those suspensions aren't enough of a detterent, then nothing will be.

(I didn't look up the NBA's policy but I figure that they have no problems with steroids because the bacne would be obvious in those tank tops)

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Even with scheduled tests, Melky was still stupid enough to get caught. I agree that despite Bud Selig's high regard to his drug testing program, it's nowhere near where it should be to deter the use of PEDs or HGH. From what I hear, all the types of testing that can be used is very pricey and with all the players that will get tested, it will definitely run up the costs for each team especially since it has to be done for every player. However, if that's the cost to promote skill and talent ONLY in the MLB (or any other sport for that matter), then I say do it.

Originally Posted by newtogolf

We can disagree, nothing wrong with that.  I'd also point out that baseball doesn't test for HGH, as HGH requires a blood test and the Players Association has to date refused to agree to blood testing.

Also as someone that's been around steroids and HGH, it's pretty easy to beat the tests if you know when the tests are being conducted.  Random and frequent testing is the only certain way to catch offenders.  In baseball the testing isn't random, it's scheduled, which means players have sufficient time to clean their system before the test.  If baseball and the players really want to get rid of PEDS, it's within their power to do so.  The current process is a lame attempt at testing and done more to appease congress than rid the sport of PEDS IMO.

Best Regards,
Ryan

In the :ogio: bag:
:nike: VR-S Covert Tour Driver 10.5 :nike: VR-S Covert Tour 3W :titleist: 712U 21*
:nike: VR Pro Blades 4-PW :vokey: Vokeys 52*, 56* & 60* :scotty_cameron: Studio Select Newport 2
:leupold:
:true_linkswear: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That's exactly it, a player has to be stupid or careless to get caught under the current system.  Blood testing for HGH is expensive, but the standard urine tests are fairly cheap.  The issue is random testing versus scheduled testing.  The MLBPA doesn't want random testing during the season and off season so it was left out of the CBA.

As I've said, I don't really have an issue with PED's, I just don't like the hypocisy.  Selig knows the current testing method allows for PED use but he and the players just want it to appear like they care.  Selig and the owners don't want to see the HR leaders drop to less than 40 HR's a season and without PED's there's only a few in the league today that can hit that many.

Originally Posted by RPMPIRE

Even with scheduled tests, Melky was still stupid enough to get caught. I agree that despite Bud Selig's high regard to his drug testing program, it's nowhere near where it should be to deter the use of PEDs or HGH. From what I hear, all the types of testing that can be used is very pricey and with all the players that will get tested, it will definitely run up the costs for each team especially since it has to be done for every player. However, if that's the cost to promote skill and talent ONLY in the MLB (or any other sport for that matter), then I say do it.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by newtogolf

We can disagree, nothing wrong with that.  I'd also point out that baseball doesn't test for HGH, as HGH requires a blood test and the Players Association has to date refused to agree to blood testing.

Also as someone that's been around steroids and HGH, it's pretty easy to beat the tests if you know when the tests are being conducted.  Random and frequent testing is the only certain way to catch offenders.  In baseball the testing isn't random, it's scheduled, which means players have sufficient time to clean their system before the test.  If baseball and the players really want to get rid of PEDS, it's within their power to do so.  The current process is a lame attempt at testing and done more to appease congress than rid the sport of PEDS IMO.

Well, shit.  If all of that is accurate then we don't disagree anymore.  I assumed that the testing in all sports for these types of things was always random.  I also didn't realize that they still haven't started testing for HGH.  Lame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Looks like another suspension - this time for the Oakland A's pitcher Bartolo Colon

Bartolo Colon Suspended

Best Regards,
Ryan

In the :ogio: bag:
:nike: VR-S Covert Tour Driver 10.5 :nike: VR-S Covert Tour 3W :titleist: 712U 21*
:nike: VR Pro Blades 4-PW :vokey: Vokeys 52*, 56* & 60* :scotty_cameron: Studio Select Newport 2
:leupold:
:true_linkswear: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


No shock there, 40 year old overweight guy comes back after questionalble shoulder surgery that involved using stem cells and returned to pitch much better than expected (95 mph fastball) for a non-knuckleball pitcher.  My guess is the Yankees knew he was using PED's and decided not to re-sign him for 2012.

MLB is going to schedule testing for anyone that appears out of the norm, guys like Melky and Colon fit into that category.  It's the guys like A-Rod and Pettite that are tougher to catch because they don't bulk up and look like they are using PED's.

Originally Posted by RPMPIRE

Looks like another suspension - this time for the Oakland A's pitcher Bartolo Colon

Bartolo Colon Suspended

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4255 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • So it's been a bit but things have been busy on my end. I have had a couple of range sessions lately and the first wasn't great but the last went really well. I started concentrating on just getting my shoulder behind the ball and it has made a world of difference. I think prior I had been thinking way too much over the ball but once I get my grip and setup done it's just one thought. My strikes were much more pure and distance despite a strong wind was very good.  I weighed in yesterday at 235. This journey started 2 years ago in May when I stepped on the scale and had 321 staring back at me. My knees feel so much better and feel stronger than I have in years. Not sure what weight I'll land on and try to maintain but I'm really pleased with the progress. 
    • Two things I bring up when it comes to this discussion. One is if you have let's say two towns next to each other, one has a population of 10,000 people and the other has a population of 1,000 people. Let's also say that they never play golf against each other. Only among themselves. In the first town, you have one guy who has won 15 events, then a couple of guys who won 6, a couple who won four and a bunch of people who won three, two and one events. In the second town, you have one guy who won 18 events, then a guy who won 11, a guy who won 9, a guy who won 8, a couple who won 7, a couple who won 3-5 and then a few 2s and a few 1s. Who's the best golfer? It's possible it's the guy who won 18, but it's pretty unlikely. Far more likely to be the guy who won 15 in the much bigger town.  In the same way, I view the fact that there is more parity in the 1990 and onwards world than there was in the pre 1990 world as a plus for Tiger. It's much harder to stand out if the fields are deeper, stronger, better. If there are a handful of players who win all of them, that tends to suggest weakness to me, not strength. The other thing is Ed White. Harvey Penick talked about him in one of his books. Ridiculously good at the game, but no one ever heard of him, because he got a job and didn't play professionally. There was no money in it and he needed security, so he took a job that paid him steadily. No clue how many people there are out there like him, but if he was around today, he'd be playing pro golf for sure. If he had played professionally, Penick sure seemed to think he'd have been one of the best of all time. Fred Haas played him in a college match and got stuffed. 40 years later he walked into Penick's shop and saw Ed White's picture on the wall and, after a full career playing pro golf, he said that Ed White was the best player he ever saw. Those 40 years would presumably have included at least some of Jack. I can see why people might say Jack is the GOAT. I don't agree, but I can at least understand why they say it. IMO there is no argument you can make for anyone other than Tiger to be the BOAT though. At least not yet.
    • A good option is to play the Par 3 courses. after playing an 18 -hole round. The Par 3 courses have 18 holes, we usually played only 9 holes after playing 36 holes on each of the trips we had. You may want to check out Grand National while you're in the middle of Alabama. I enjoyed Oxmoor Valley and Ross Bridge courses which are a short drive north.
    • In August, I am playing the World Am in Myrtle Beach. I do not know which courses yet, but should be a blast. Aside from that, those are the only golf trip plans, unless I play while on vacation in Destin in June.
    • Even on a perfect center hit I was receiving at most 1.48 smash factor. 10 days ago on the warming up for a round my Driver made a weird sound, I checked the bottom and it was cracked. Don't know for how long it was cracked but at least this time the crack was easy visible. Maybe it was already cracked before but with a more subtle crack?.. don't know. I'm waiting for TaylorMade to approve the warranty and send me a new head. I was using the Stealth Plus, I will take the opportunity and upgrade it to the Qi10 LS paying the difference.  On Sunday with my old Titleist 915 and softer balls I was reaching 1.5, even 1.51 on center hits. Test didn't went well. Only gained 2..3 miles, not worth pursuing. Figured out that with a ball and with a target, my path was way to in to out with this new idea, so in order to move the club in the correct path I needed to slow down to redirect the club on the downswing or aim more to the right, close the face a play a big hook.. not possible. I already play a big draw with Driver, more curvature is unplayable. Yesterday at home, with no ball messed around with a more neutral path, even swinging a little out to in. It felt a lot more in sync with the body. With a big in to out path it feels like my hands are working right, away from the body, when the body is working to rotate to the left. With the path to the left is was easier to apply force thru the hitting zone.  As always tested 10 swings with my current swing (A), and 10 with this little out to in path(B).  The difference was huge, like 12 miles faster with swing (B). I knew something wasn't right. The fact was that the PRGR was aligned more in line with the (B) path so it of course was giving higher speeds. I proceeded to align it with the (A) path and tested again 5 more swings each. Again (B) was faster but only by 5 miles. (Made a tiny experiment moving the PRGR to a more extreme in to out path and the swings register 25/30% slower for both swings, so it wasn't reading properly at that angle) Finally I moved the PRGR in the middle of both paths, and this time (B) won by 9 miles. Off course, this was without a ball and a target so.. I will be hitting the range tomorrow to see the real difference.            
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...