• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
lisevolution

Nike V-Rev Wedges

10 posts in this topic

In follow up to my previous post about wedges for a high handi-capper, I have been looking around and some of my options and I came across a great deal for a 3 wedge set of the Nike V-Rev wedges.  I've been looking around at reviews and they seem to get pretty good ones at most places I've seen.  Since these are discontinued it's going to be close to impossible to swing these exact wedges, especially as a lefty.  I have had a chance to swing the newer Nike VR wedges with the high frequency grooves or whatever they call them and they felt pretty good, nice weighting etc.

I'm just curious if anyone on here has hit or is hitting these wedges and what they're thoughts are on them compared to spending a bit more for something like the Cleveland CG-14/16 or Cobra Big Trusty Rusty which also felt pretty good when I swung them.

As always I appreciate the feedback!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I'll chime in!

I have these wedges and have been playing them for about 2 months now and have found that they perform very nicely. One thing that I like about these clubs is that they have a fantastic sole grind that is very versatile in all conditions; firm, soft, tight, fairways, sand. Some people have complained that these offer no spin compared to the older groove patterns that were very aggressive to begin with but these offer great spin.

I am coming from the VR Forged wedges that played the same in terms of sole grind and turf interaction but the Vrev wedges don't chew up golf balls and you still get really nice spin! I am currently using the 20XI-S, so I am getting great spin and have been able to stop balls on a dime with these wedges. I had about a 35 yard shot, hard-pan lie with dirt and played it with the face open with my 58, one hop and it stopped dead 10 in. from the pin. I have hit a couple of shots similar since then but it was really eye opening.

Overall, great wedges, durable, feel great and have an amazing sole grind like I stated above....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the feedback.  I was able to find the set of 3 wedges 52/56/60 for like $150 so for that price it definitely seems worth it.

Honestly, I'm not good enough at this point to really notice the spin difference and to me the fact they won't shred the balls like the older ones did is definitely a good thing!  I'm looking at these as a set I'll keep through my next set of irons and maybe longer than that and they will definitely be a big step up from the Sumo2 wedges that came with the Sumo2 Hybrid Irons set I bought to reacquaint myself to the game after 12 or so years off.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My sand wedge is a v-rev and I enjoy it. Good feel and I am able to get decent spin on the ball. Ball doesn't come off the face too hot and I am able to control chips from just off the green pretty well. $150 for three is a good deal, definitely recommend the investment.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also play these with 10° bounce.  For those that say they don't produce enough spin I would blame their swing.  I find myself trying to reduce the amount of spin I put on the ball for longer shots.  I feel they are great clubs and very affordable.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I ended up picking up the 3 pack for $99 today along with a new Yes! putter shipped next day to more door for under $200!  I look at like this... if I hate them for some reason I can always re-sell them for virtually what I paid via ebay.  Considering I'm playing terrible wedges that came with my Sumo2 set I can't see myself not like these especially for what I paid for them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this is an older thread but was wondering how the Nike wedges worked out for you? I will be getting a new sand wedge and maybe gap or lob this upcoming season and the prices for Nike wedges seem to be around $69 per club. thanks

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by jmanbooyaa

I know this is an older thread but was wondering how the Nike wedges worked out for you? I will be getting a new sand wedge and maybe gap or lob this upcoming season and the prices for Nike wedges seem to be around $69 per club. thanks

I hope you see this reply, it's been a while since you last posted.  WIth that said, these wedges do perform well for the price.  I've seen them a little cheaper then $69, I believe it was on rockbottomgolf.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by jmanbooyaa

I know this is an older thread but was wondering how the Nike wedges worked out for you? I will be getting a new sand wedge and maybe gap or lob this upcoming season and the prices for Nike wedges seem to be around $69 per club. thanks

After the initial getting comfortable phase of learning the new clubs I can say they were a huge improvement over the set wedges I was playing previously.  I am far from an expert player but I could definitely feel the difference and the spin was significantly better with these.  I'm still terrible out of the sand but that's more about my swing then the wedge.  For the price you can find these for now I would not hesitate to pick them up if you haven't already.  I got mine from Rockbottomgolf.com and they seem to have the best prices on them anywhere I've seen.  I got a 52,56 and 60 for $99 at the time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I ended up with the vr pro sw. Can't wait to get a round in with it. Thanls for the replies.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • 2016 TST Initiative: Forward Tees Tournament
      In Lowest Score Wins, we recommend that golfers play from the forward tees in order to experience "breaking 80" for the first time, or shooting 65, or having more birdie putts than they've ever had, or whatever. This year, in 2016, we're taking it one step farther: we're encouraging everyone here to work with the head pro at your home course (or, if you play multiple courses, the head pro at each of them!) and to set up a serious "Forward Tees Tournament." A Forward Tees Tournament (FTT) will be: FUN! Enlightening Unique Challenging I'll give anyone who creates and/or participates in a FTT this year the special achievement/award seen to the left. Anyone with this award will be entered to win a TST prize to be determined at the end of the year (and I'll do my best to make it a fairly good prize, but that shouldn't be the main reason why anyone should do this). You can play: With or without handicaps. With or without brackets/divisions/flights. Stroke play or match play. 18, 27, 36, 54+ holes. One day, two days, three days. Etc. I think golfers will love playing in this type of tournament. I think it will challenge them to think about how they play and score. I think it will result in faster play, more fun, more birdies, more chances to hit 7-iron into par fives and feel like a Tour player for once, and… lower scores (or higher scores for the dumb players!). So there you have it. What can you do from here? Pledge here in this thread to talk to your head pro. Recruit your buddies and local golfers to play in your event. Work with your head pro to make the event a success. Play in the event! Post here after your tournament has been played to claim your super-exclusive award/achievement! I'm in. I'll be doing this, hopefully at multiple courses this year. Are you?
    • Posting old scores
      I haven't had an official handicap for about 15 years because in the past several I've only been able to play 6-8 times per year. This year I joined a club so that I could play in tournaments and since I need five scores to get a handicap, I entered some scores in GHIN from my last few rounds in 2015 (since I play so rarely, I can remember them). When I was doing this, I forgot to change the date when posting a score from August so it defaulted to today and is now my most recent reported score. GHIN won't let me change the entry but says to "contact my club" to fix it, which seems like a hassle for everyone involved. It's not my lowest score but it's close, so it will probably be included in my handicap calculation for quite a while unless the date is changed. How big of a deal is this?
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Another thing is sometimes to 'give up' on par. For example, as a bogey golfer, if I hit a bad tee shot and end up say 220yds from the hold on a par 4 rather than the usual 130yds, play the hole as if bogey is the new par. You've made the hole more difficult for yourself and rather than trying to hit the green with a 3 wood (a green designed to be hit with a mid/short iron), take 2 shots to get on the green and 2 shots to get down. 1 220yd par 4 is an easy hole (could even make birdie (which becomes par and a great save) whereas a 220 yd par 3, not off the tee, is asking for trouble. Not always the best way to play golf (read Lowest Score Wins) but the best way to avoid blowing up.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Find it yourself please. I don't think that would provide much insight. Courses, technology… all very different. Too many differences. People who qualify for the Opens rarely actually compete for them. The winners and top finishers almost always come from those who qualify automatically. I'm not. Very few foreign golfers played on the PGA Tour in the 60s. It's been steadily growing - and travel has made it easier, too - through to now. And even now we're starting to see Asian golfers really take over. The only Asian golfer many could name who competed against Nicklaus was Isao Aoki. Maybe Jumbo Ozaki. I'm just talking about the number of golfers. There are a ton more now. I don't care. I realize perhaps your condition forces you to take everything literally, but I wasn't being literal here. The PGA Tour takes the best 150 players or so out of X. As X grows, the amount of separation between those top 150 players narrows. We're in a very narrow phase right now. When Jack was playing, the gap was significantly wider. No. Tiger was quite a bit more dominant and "above" even MORE highly competitive fields. Both halves of that are true: Tiger won by larger margins and against stronger fields. I agree. And I've said similar things. No…? You don't say? (On page 273 of a thread doing just that…)? You seem to be the only person who regards WGCs as weaker fields that offer a "competitive break." It says a lot about how others should consider your opinions on strength of field. You're assuming or haven't read many of my posts in this thread, because I've said several times that I'd put it within a few points of 50/50. Maybe 55/45. Hardly what I'd call "strong." Of course we're both "estimating." Tiger's record, IMO, against significantly stiffer competition, puts him ahead. Not by a lot. Not really. If only 30 players had a realistic chance to win a tournament, adding players beyond that 30th player does little to affect the strength of the field. The WGCs could add 200 club professionals that would never win and… the strength of field would remain exactly the same. Where have I said this? Because even if I did, it doesn't support whatever you're trying to force it into supporting here. The odds of a club pro beating anyone on the PGA Tour these days are slim to none. They were slightly more likely back when fewer "A" players played the PGA Tour… like in the 60s and 70s. A "C" player's game almost never varies enough - not for four days - to beat even 10 or 15 "A" players. Here's an opinion, but one I could probably back up if I cared enough to take the time (I do not): a modern WGC has a stronger field than many (perhaps all) of the majors Nicklaus won. I've said this before, and will say it again here: In Jack's day, there were maybe 10-15 "A" players, 25 "B" players, and the rest were "C" players. Today there are 100+ A players and the rest B players. I'm also going to request, mostly because of the number of times I've had to repeat myself in this thread, that you not quote or respond to me, @natureboy, in this thread. I'm not keen on repeating myself about something that, ultimately, I don't care that much about. It is what it is, their records are what they are, and they could only beat the guys they played against.
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Never try to hit through trees, always just get back to the fairway.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries