Jump to content
IGNORED

Should we ditch the 'swing of a thousand positions'?


ChrisGSZ
Note: This thread is 4168 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I've just completed a thorough review of the science underlying the golf swing (I'm a sports scientist). The main conclusion is that we'd improve faster by paying less (far less...) attention to technique. Focusing on complex technique (any technique...) stifles our innate skill-learning mechanisms - which thrive on simplicity.

This is great news - our fastest route to improvement isn't some complex theory - it's the ability to focus on just a handful of extremely simple swing thoughts.

So the 'swing of a thousand positions' is a major barrier to improvement - it's great fun to discuss and debate, but it's of little practical use to swing improvement.

Happy to expand on this in any way...

Thoughts....?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by ChrisGSZ

I've just completed a thorough review of the science underlying the golf swing (I'm a sports scientist). The main conclusion is that we'd improve faster by paying less (far less...) attention to technique. Focusing on complex technique (any technique...) stifles our innate skill-learning mechanisms - which thrive on simplicity.

This is great news - our fastest route to improvement isn't some complex theory - it's the ability to focus on just a handful of extremely simple swing thoughts.

So the 'swing of a thousand positions' is a major barrier to improvement - it's great fun to discuss and debate, but it's of little practical use to swing improvement.

Happy to expand on this in any way...

Thoughts....?

What are all the 1000 positions? I saw a book that references this by Chris Riddoch, is this the reference?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Makes sense to me. Isn't that why we get better once the feel of "proper" makes sense to us? Everyone learns differently, but I feel like I learn the fastest and most efficiently when I can engrain a feel quickly. I think that's why drills are better than positions. Once you do the mirror work to understand what the ideal position feels like, it seems more effective to find the feel, not just pose.

What I mean is...it seems that the best students are able to convert a thought to a feel really quickly. Hank Haney stated in his book that Tiger Woods could implement a feel very quickly by fine tuning the feeling of the extremes. I hear he was a pretty good golfer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1000 is rhetorical - read 'too many...'. But most coaching books would have close to this number of technical details. The essential point is we can only hold 2-3 thoughts in our brains at any one time, so any number higher than than is a problem. And yes - this is Chris and the reference is correct. I'm hoping to be able to expand on the review and offer additional insights on this excellent forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ajlepisto, you've hit the nail on the head.... The human body has excellent systems for learning skills (i.e. hitting an object with a stick), but not for learning positions within that skill. They take care of themselves as the skill improves. So yes, 'feels' are crucial in improving any complex skill like the golf swing. Ironically, a few generations ago everyone learned through 'feel' - and now the power of modern science is discovering it's actually the best way! The complexities of technique are of course valuable - we just need to translate them into much simpler concepts before we use them for swing development.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by ChrisGSZ

Ajlepisto, you've hit the nail on the head.... The human body has excellent systems for learning skills (i.e. hitting an object with a stick), but not for learning positions within that skill. They take care of themselves as the skill improves. So yes, 'feels' are crucial in improving any complex skill like the golf swing. Ironically, a few generations ago everyone learned through 'feel' - and now the power of modern science is discovering it's actually the best way! The complexities of technique are of course valuable - we just need to translate them into much simpler concepts before we use them for swing development.

.

I'd completely agree. I've always thought the real reason that children learn better is not because their brains are more efficient, but rather that they aren't as concerned with things like form and appeal and simply focus on the task. I've never seen a kid worry about what they looked like, yet as adults, we analyze and try to find the correct poses. It's amazing how much better one gets when we just trust our brain and body to make the adjustments for us.

My wife is a great example. The longer she takes to swing, the worse the shot will be. I've played best, especially putting and chipping, with this idea. Just take your time approaching the ball, but once there, don't think. Simply let your brain do the calculations and adjustments for speed, line, etc. I've been way more accurate letting it happen automatically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How do we unlearn all the thoughts and thinking we've learned over the years when trying to correct a fault? For example: starting from scratch we slice, knowing either the path or face is wrong... By default our mind is trained to use the swing of a thousand positions in trying to correct our fault. How do we blindly trust our body to correct our slice without knowledge, self awareness, and repetition?...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think keeping simple swing thoughts is what good instructors actually do.  So people may need to fix 1000 things in their swing, but never at once.  The good instructor will keep you "priority" pieces and keep things as simple as possible while providing you with the information that is required.  So I agree with you and disagree with you at the same time.  There is LOTS to work on, but never all at once.

In my bag

Driver:      SLDR 10.5*

Hybrids:   Taylormade RBZ Stage 2

Irons:       NikeVR PRO 4-PW

Wedges:   Nike VR Pro 50* 54* 58*

Putter:      2014 Newport 2

Ball:          E6

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Feel is key. However science dont know how to train feel based approach effectively. It take 3 months or less to do a swing overhaul. Not 2 years ala Woods etc.. I got the numbers for it.

Robert Something

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have to disagree to a point. For me I need to learn or relearn many of the positions.  Now after I learn these positions by slow repetitions I then need to just let go of it and let the feel put me in these positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Micromanaging the body is the key to disaster. I have one or two swing keys I keep tabs on, then let the body do the rest. One of the hardest things in golf is telling the mind to shut up and let things happen.

I was talking to my son about putting, which I've always struggled with. He said someone told him to look at the hole instead of the ball when putting, (a technique I had never heard of before, but may be quite familiar to you guys). It initially struck me as kind of goofy, but the more I thought about it, the more it kind of made sense. I tried it and it worked great! My body just needed to see  where the hole was and how far the ball needed to go in order to be more accurate. I don't need to keep my eyes on the ball in order to hit it, so why not put them to better use.

The body works best with minimal input from the mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You should talk to this guy--see how he's doing [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/t/53295/my-swing-hogan-project/234]http://thesandtrap.com/t/53295/my-swing-hogan-project/234[/URL]

HiBore XLS Tour 9.5*
Adams Fast10 15* 3W
A2OS 3H-7iron 60* LW
8iron Precept Tour Premium cb
9iron and 45* PW 50* GW 56* SW m565 and 455 VfoilPutter Anser Belly Putter Ball in order of preference TPblack e5 V2  AD333

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I guess everybody learns a little differently.  I first took lessons with a guy who taught mostly feel and then some with a guy who taught more positions.  What it sort of evolved into, for me, is using feel to achieve positions . .and using positions (like with video) to validate the feeling.  My current routine with my golf pro is that he tells me what I need to work on, shows me the correct positions and gives me some drills to work on . . and I search for the feeling that gets me into those positions - using video to check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Some excellent comments! I can't respond to all individually, but here are some further comments.

HANALEI asks how to unlearn. There's no need to - it's just a simpler way of achieving the same thing. It's using our strengths rather than stifling them. STRIKEONE has got it right - telling the mind to 'shut up' would improve all our swings. We know from over a century of research that every movement made by the body is controlled and determined by the brain - what we think about determines the quality of EVERY swing we make. A golf swing takes 1.2 seconds to perform - and the downswing, where the important stuff takes place, just 0.2s. Time for maybe just one or two thoughts? Three at most? It's best not to waste it/them on a small technical detail!

The essential pont is that we learn best unconsciously - not consciously thinking our way through technical positions. No other sport coaches via positions - yet in golf we've become addicted to it.

In answer to SOON-TOURPRO, science DOES know how to train 'feel' - it has a fancy scientific name, but essentially its system we used when we learned to walk, ride bikes and tie shoelaces - we weren't coached through positions - we just 'did it' - unconsciously.

I really like AMAZINGWHACKERS comment of using video to validate what a feel - this is exactly how the body learns best!

To HOGANWOODS - actually the golf swing consists of just four key movement skills - which is a much more manageable proposition than 40 or 400.... It almost fits with the 2-3 thoughts we can hold during a swing. Maybe this is the best way forward - to focus on those four major movements?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by uttexas

You should talk to this guy--see how he's doing

http://thesandtrap.com/t/53295/my-swing-hogan-project/234

great point.  Obviously trying to duplicate every position isn't working to well for him

Driver: Titleist 915 D3
3 wood: 15 Callaway X Hot pro
Hybrids:  18 Callaway X Hot Pro
Irons: 4-GW Callaway Apex
project x 6.0
Wedges: 54 , 58 Callaway
Putter: 2 ball
Ball: Callaway Chrome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Patrick aren't you bored with this yet?

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by ChrisGSZ

I've just completed a thorough review of the science underlying the golf swing (I'm a sports scientist). The main conclusion is that we'd improve faster by paying less (far less...) attention to technique. Focusing on complex technique (any technique...) stifles our innate skill-learning mechanisms - which thrive on simplicity.

This is great news - our fastest route to improvement isn't some complex theory - it's the ability to focus on just a handful of extremely simple swing thoughts.

So the 'swing of a thousand positions' is a major barrier to improvement - it's great fun to discuss and debate, but it's of little practical use to swing improvement.

Happy to expand on this in any way...

Thoughts....?

Chris,

Go to YouTube and search for "Shawn Clement golf."  You and he will be exactly on the same page.  In fact, you'll find dozens of hours of videos of him talking about exactly these things.

Shawn is all about using rhythm, gravity and momentum combined with an understanding of how human anatomy and the golf swing fit together.

I firmly believe Shawn has discovered the right way to teach the golf swing.  Well, perhaps not "discovered" as many of the concepts are not new, but he is delivering it more clearly than ever before.  The laws of physics don't change.  If you swing to get maximum benefit from those laws, you will create a highly repeatable swing.  Will you always be perfect?  Of course not - we're human beings after all.  However, if you swing in such a way that you're fighting gravity or anatomy, or trying to actively manipulate the club, you may have temporary success, but eventually you're going to lose the battle.

Now, does that mean that one cannot learn to be a good golfer from one who teaches traditional "club manipulation?"  No, it doesn't.  After all, probably every pro on the PGA tour was taught in this style. For some people (like them), it "clicks" early.  They think, "Oh....that's what I'm supposed to be feeling.  That's what it feels like when gravity and centrifugal force act upon my swing."  Others take decades before they finally start to get it.  Still others, like myself, never did get that feeling and likely never would have, had we not discovered the teachings of Shawn Clement.

So preach on brother!  I'm front row in the choir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4168 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Makes sense.  Like I said, I wouldn't have been upset at their original offer either, and based on the fine print it seems like they've held up their end of the deal.  
    • If you've only had to adjust retroactively one time in 8 years and have around 5 people each year without handicaps, that's like 40-50 people total so it sounds like you're doing a pretty good job. I think your questions give enough to go off of. This might be a good way to get new people to actually post a few scores during the 6 weeks leading into the first event. Something like "New members will be eligible for tournament money once they have at least 3 posted rounds in GHIN" or something like that. If they can get 3 rounds in prior to their first event, then they're eligible. If not, they'll soon become eligible after an event or two assuming they play a little bit outside of events.
    • This is a loooooong winded narrative so if you don't like long stories, move on. 😉 Our senior club typically gets about 25 new members each year. We lose about 25 members each year for various reasons (moved to FL/AZ, disabled, dead, too expensive). Of the new members, usually 20 have an active GHIN handicap. About 5 each year do not have a GHIN handicap. When they join our club, we give each member a state association membership that includes GHIN handicapping services. We play a series of handicapped tournaments over the summer. When we sign up a new member who does not have a GHIN handicap, we attempt to give them an estimated index until they have sufficient scores posted to have an actual GHIN index.  Our first event typically is around May 15 so, in theory, a new member has about 6 weeks to post a few scores. Posting season in the Mitten starts April 1. Inevitably, several of the unhandicapped individuals seem  to either not play until the first tournament or can't figure out how to enter scores (hey, they are seniors). That situation then leads to my contacting the new member and asking a series of questions: a. Did you ever have a GHIN handicap? If yes, which State and do you recall what it was? b. Do you have an alternate handicap through a non-GHIN handicap service or a league? c. What do you think your average score was last year (for 9 or 18) d. What was your best score last year? Where did you play and which tee was used? e. What do you consider a very good score for yourself? Based on their responses I attempt to give them an index that makes them competitive in the first couple events BUT does not allow them to win their flight in the first couple events. We don't want the new members to finish last and at the same time, we don't want someone with a "20" playing handicap to win the third flight with a net 57. In the event some new member did shoot a net 57, we also advise everyone that we can and will adjust handicaps retroactively when it is clear to us that a member's handicap does not accurately reflect their potential. We don't like to adjust things retroactively and in the 8 years I have chaired the Handicap Committee, we have only done it once. So here are the questions to the mob: Any ideas how to do this better? Any questions one might ask an unhandicapped individual to better estimate their index/handicap? Would it be reasonable to have a new player play once (or more?) without being eligible to place in the money?
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Awesome! I got that a while back with my start word! Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜🟩⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...