• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
TMBridgestone

Titleist Velocity

16 posts in this topic

Do these go as far as they say?  I need a little extra distance from my Pro V1, but Im skeptical, Titleist says that there is only a 4 yard difference between all of their golf balls.  What?  I thought these were supposed to go really far!  Tell me what you think.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Originally Posted by TMBridgestone

Do these go as far as they say?  I need a little extra distance from my Pro V1, but Im skeptical, Titleist says that there is only a 4 yard difference between all of their golf balls.  What?  I thought these were supposed to go really far!  Tell me what you think.

I'm sure one of the experts here will chime in, but it is my understanding that for a golf ball to conform to Royal and Ancient and USGA standards it can only travel so far when tested by the machine they nicknamed Iron Byron.  When Titleist says there is only a 4 yard difference I expect they are referring to the test conditions under which a ball must conform.

The difference in golf ball construction and design is to make a ball that is suitable to all different types of swings and swing speeds, with features to promote high spin, low spin, high trajectory, low trajectory, soft feel, etc. They can put all these different features into a ball but it's still not allowed to go farther than the standard.

I played a sleeve of the new Velocity balls and hated them. Distance for me was just a little longer than the Pro V1 I usually play, but not enough for me to want to give up the feel and the spin characteristics just to get a few more yards. I didn't make any reall reliable measurements but I'd bet a good deal of money that I didn't get 5 extra yards.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Titleist Velocity ball seems to just skate the line of what the USGA allows for conforming golf balls. I bought a couple boxes and have been playing them for the last few weeks. I personally find the Velocity to be the longest and STRAIGHTEST golf ball I have ever played. My Driver gets a little wild at times, and I honestly feel this ball helps my mis-hits from spraying too far off-line. There have been some mixed reviews about the balls ability to hold greens or it's 'feel' for putting. I personally have had no issues with the ball holding greens. I hit my irons quite high, and this ball seems to sit fine for me on greens. My usually weekly playing partner has always been 10-15 yards longer than myself off the tee, sometimes more. Recently, with the Velocity, (and my new Callaway Razr X Black Driver) I have been driving the golf ball side by side with him, or out-driving him occasionally. The above opinions are solely based on my experiences over the last couple weeks. The ball is clearly not a magic fix for anything. If you play the Pro V1 now, I'm not sure you would enjoy the change. Unless you are trying to find a more affordable option, I'd say stick to the Pro V.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I heard that the stopping power is like a range ball!  Is that true?  If it is, I dont like them!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard that the stopping power is like a range ball!  Is that true?  If it is, I dont like them!

No. Not true at all. The balls stops on greens. It hits nothing like a range ball. It is not going to have the feel or spin like a Pro V1. I hit a handful of 100 yard gap wedge shots yesterday into (soft) greens and got some backspin around the pin while using the Velocity. I think the comparisons to a range ball is way off.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Like a lot of the other distance balls, it will be longer than a Pro V1.  How much is dependent upon your swing.  Unlike a robot, most of us dont hit the ball perfectly every time, so all that lovely backspin of a tour ball turns into nasty sidespin.  With a distance ball, the harder cover helps to limit that spin, which helps us to hit longer, straighter shots.

However, you will pay a penalty when you are trying to hit your shot into the green in that the ball wont check up as much as a Pro V1 will.  Its a tradeoff and you need to decide which is more important to you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you compare the stopping power to a NXT Tour or HX Diablo Tour?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you compare the stopping power to a NXT Tour or HX Diablo Tour?

I have not played either of those balls enough to make a direct comparison. Sorry.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by TMBridgestone

Would you compare the stopping power to a NXT Tour or HX Diablo Tour?

I have not played the HX Diablo Tour ball but I sometimes play the NXT Tour I get a reasonable amount of spin on green side chips and pitches with the NXT Tour but none with the Velocity. The NXT has a better feel and is closer to a ProV1 in feel and performance than the Velocity.  I can make a range ball spin with a full swing from 100 yards but that isn't where the spin is important for me.  I want the stopping power on half swing wedges and chips. The Velocity just doesn' have it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How does the Velocity feel off irons?  I liked the NXT Extreme, but Pinnacles feel too hard.  Is the Velocity feel as hard as Pinnacle or is it a bit softer?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My playing partner swears by these balls. He bought 100 of them off ebay in AAAA condition for 51 bucks. He let me play one and I was surprised! It was nice and long off the tee, felt nice on the approach shot and putted smooth on the green. If i needed golf balls it would definitely be something to look into in my book.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How does the Velocity feel off irons?  I liked the NXT Extreme, but Pinnacles feel too hard.  Is the Velocity feel as hard as Pinnacle or is it a bit softer?

It feels way softer than a pinnacle in my book. To me it feels more like a Pro V1 off the club than anything else.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried a sleeve if Velocity's and they are nothing at all like a Prov1 or any other tour caliber urethene ball.  And they are not meant to be.  Even for my 85-90 SS there was a pop off the driver and the balls were long, probably TF XL or Pinnacle Gold long, and somewhat better around the greens.  But I hit a Gamer Tour almost as far and then have a urethene cover to help me pitch and chip around the green.  The Velocity's are good balls for what they are designed to be.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used them in the past and I really like it. Probably should just buy these instead of spending more for the NXT Tour. All of my lowest scores of 2013 I used the Velocity.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I got a dozen of these for Xmas last year (monogramed B-) ), just waiting for the fairways to dry up a bit before I put them in play. I'll post back whenever I get the chance to try them out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Found a sleeve in the tote of golf crap I have in the basement so I used them yesterday. People complain this ball won't hold greens but I don't have that problem with it. Muni greens tend to be squishy so that could be part of it. After duffing a 3w from the tee I hit a low burner with the same 3w from 230 to center on a hole that plays uphill last night and found my ball about 8 feet past the pin. I thought I hit it over because it rolled over a hump on the back side, the hole was cut right in the ridge on the backside of the green, but there it was. A few holes later I had a 105 shot on a short par 4 so I punched a 50 wedge up there and it landed on a little slope and rolled about 5' from the ball mark. I really can't feel any difference between the Velocity and the NXT balls. I will give it a spin later too, still have two left.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • The Films and Movies Thread
      A little late finding this - X-Men, Days of Future Past Quicksilver scene in realtime.   
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I'd be curious to see just what Jack said. I think "10 or 15" having a chance to win for typical PGA Tour events in any era is an exaggeration of the relative weakness of the fields. Even before there was a depth of talent in the U.S. and the 'golf craze' here took off, the money drew top level golfers from overseas who were following the better money available here in tournaments and pro positions. I accept there's been a general strengthening of fields as the expansion in prize money and the total population of competitive golfers (see chart below) have forced top golfers to have more preparation and polish, but I don't think there's really ever been a lack of generally elite level competition on the PGA tour or at the Majors since about the 20's or 30's. I think if the effect of a tiny number of truly top level competitors taking on a bunch of club pro relative 'dubs' was as strong as you seem to think that most of the top multiple Major winners would be golfers from the early days of the tour. But to me it looks pretty balanced across eras. I'll see if I can work up some actual numbers. By the 1920s there were likely about 1.5 million golfers (in the U.S. alone), which is a pretty healthy base from which to draw potential 'top talent'. Total participation in golf from when Jack started to when Tiger started roughly tripled. As far as rating 'achievement' you play in the era you play with the existing disadvantages and advantages. IMO, if Jack had grown up as a contemporary of Tiger with the same advantages of technology and swing instruction / coaching and the same disadvantages of a greater number of potential competitors that they would both have risen to elite levels and would have regularly been battling for Amateur and Major Championships. I don't think the potential ranges of human abilities / talent really change much in a few generations. Would I consider Tiger more competitively vetted, yes. Do I think that means his talent level and achievements were automatically greater than Jack's? No. I could see valuing Tiger's win total more than Jack's (and certainly Snead's with some 'iffy' events in the total) because of the relative talent base depth, but not sure that transfers as readily to the performance in Majors, particularly the Opens. I think it would have been amazing and exciting to be able to see them compete at their peaks rather than a boring foregone conclusion.  
    • 2016 Waste Management Phoenix Open Discussion
      I really like Hideki's takeaway... Nice smooth swing.
    • 2016 Waste Management Phoenix Open Discussion
      Fowler is one the fastest on tour, anyone is going to look slower than usual playing alongside him.
    • AMA Thread (@iacas)
      I mowed lawns when I was a kid. I don't think that quite counts. I delivered local "coupon newspapers" (the "Greensheets") when I was also a kid. That sucked, but I was paid something like nine cents per paper delivered. I hated it though. They weighed a lot, and I had to pick them up every Friday and deliver them for a few hours every Saturday morning. Year-round. I washed cars for a month (on weekends) at a local car dealership. I got to drive a Dodge Viper around the block. They didn't care that I was 15 and didn't have my driver's license yet… Yeah, I still don't know what they were thinking on that one. I had my learner's permit, but… so what? I was driving cars from the lot into the street and down to the washing bay half a block away, and then back up to the lot. I worked at the Erie Zoo (which ran the ice rink next door during the winter) for about a full year. I often ran the carousel. I still hate certain songs, particularly the ones we played during the annual Zoo Boo. "I put a spell on you…" makes me irrationally angry.  (Not really, but I still hate hearing the song.) That was an actual job, with a W2 or a W9 or whatever stuff you fill out. Concessions and rides and whatnot at the Erie Zoo. I'd like to think I was a good employee. I once even got a speeding ticket (the cops loved to sit, I'd later discover, at the base of a very large hill near the zoo) and still made it to work and punched in before my start time.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. onthehunt526
      onthehunt526
      (29 years old)
  • Blog Entries