• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
mvmac

Who Will Be The 2014 U.S. Ryder Cup Captain?

0   27 votes

  1. 1. Who Will Be The 2014 U.S. Ryder Cup Captain?

    • David Toms
      1
    • Larry Nelson
      4
    • Fred Couples
      7
    • Jim Furyk
      1
    • Tom Watson
      13
    • Paul Azinger
      0
    • Jack Nicklaus
      1

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

42 posts in this topic

With David Toms apparently not getting a call yet and only 48 hours to go, it's not looking good for the former PGA Champion.

Quote:

Each of the last five U.S. captains has been a major championship winner, between the ages of 46-50 and still active on the PGA Tour, competing in at least eight events during the year of his captaincy. Toms is the only man who would fit those criteria for the next skipper, but the fact that he hasn’t heard from those making the decision doesn’t bode well for his chances.

All of which likely means the PGA of America is seeking a different type of captain in the wake of five losses in the last six editions of the competition.

Potential candidates are believed to include Tom Watson, who captained the team to its last win on foreign soil in 1993; Fred Couples, who is 2-0 as Presidents Cup captain; and Larry Nelson, a three-time major champion, who is considered amongst the biggest snubs for the roles in the past few decades.

"It would be a great honor if I got tapped on the shoulder," Watson said during last week’s Australian Open. "'93 was the last time I've been to a Ryder Cup. I'd like to go back as captain. That would be cool."

That leaves the competition wide open. Dark-horse possibilities include Kenny Perry and Paul Azinger, who was the last man to lead the U.S. to victory in 2008. Some have even been talking about two-time captain Jack Nicklaus.  He last captained the Presidents Cup team to victory in 2007.  Or maybe this is Larry Nelson's year?  Vote for who you think will get the job.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I think Fred Couples will get it (so that is who I voted for), but I believe Larry Nelson deserves it.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I voted for Couples too. I think he's proved to be a good captain with the last two President's Cups. The Ryder Cup has more weight added to it compared to the PC, but I think Couples can handle the added pressure.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lee Trevino...he'll tell it like it is, mentally soft boys of today need a push.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hal Sutton deserves another go.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hal Sutton deserves another go.

He was such a good player in the event I don't understand why he couldn't translate that into his captaincy. After thinking some more about this, I think we should nominate Hale Irwin. I think he deserves a chance as much as if not more than Nelson.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Well it is going to be Tom Watson, so I guess 3 people were right!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Couples is the current Presidents Cup Captain so I don't think the PGA will pick him. There is a lot of buzz about the possibility of Tom Watson taking the helm, that would be cool. I am not a huge David Toms fan, but I certainly don't dislike the man either. He is kinda vanilla if you ask me, I would rather have someone with some spark!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I voted for Couples based on his PC record. But I have a sneaking feeling that the PGA may actually tab Tom Watson. Not sure its the right move but a win will validate any choice.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watson was the last American to captain his team to victory on European soil. I'll take him.

2016 through 2020 are going to be filled with some combination of Furyk, Stricker, and Mickelson, there's little doubt about that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Wansteadimp

Hal Sutton deserves another go.

lol good one

From what I'm hearing they're going to go with Watson, my heart says Couples though.  Freddy seems to have a great rapport with the US players and creates a fun, relaxed atmosphere.  I'm thinking Tom Watson may be too out of touch with the players.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Tom Watson would be a very popular choice in Europe - particularly Scotland, I think all his Open wins were in Scotland, he is regarded almost as one of their own.

I think he would avoid some of the mistakes that US Captains have made in Europe, certainly he would know that waterproofs need to, you know, be waterproof!

Spoke to a guy yesterday who had played the Ryder Cup course at Gleneagles in September and he said it was very very wet, if it rains, then it may end up like Celtic Manor.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it will be Tom Watson because of his winning record as a past captain and his open championship success

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by scottothegreat

I think it will be Tom Watson because of his winning record as a past captain and his open championship success


I think it will be Tom Watson because it's been reported for the last 24 hours.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't seen anything definite yet I agree the signs are pointing to Watson but would I bet my life on it no there are plenty of other good candidates for the job.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read that it was announced that Watson will be the captain.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I thought the PGA said it would be announced tomorrow? I heard the President say that the last time the US won on European soil was 1993, guess who the captain was. Tom Watson. I think that was a hint.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Longer or More Accurate?
      That doesn't make it a trick question. People aren't so lousy with accuracy that they're off 200 yards, but their tee shots travel 200 yards toward the target fairly often. The 10% thing helps to adjust them to the proper scale. I hit my driver 270, but I don't miss by 1/4 of that distance (67.5 yards). The wildest 100-shooting golfers are about +/- 10°. Their average is about 7°. 80-golfers are around 6°. 70 golfers probably about 5°. PGA Tour pros are around 3.5°. So 10% of those numbers are 0.7, 0.6, and 0.5°, with 0.35° for PGA Tour players. And yet, give each of them a full 1° (or  14% more accuracy for 100-golfers, 17% more accuracy for 80-golfers, 20% more accuracy for 70-golfers, and nearly 30% more accuracy for PGA Tour players… and they still come up short (or, at the PGA Tour level, only begin to break even). This means that the poll is biased, indeed, but in the opposite direction you think, @Marty2019. The poll could have said "would you choose 25% more accuracy or 10% more distance" and everyone (generalized to groups, not individuals) would STILL be better off choosing the distance. The only "trick" is that people value accuracy way, way too much, to the point where many are happy to take only a 10% improvement in accuracy while even a 25% improvement still can't account for the added value of driving the ball an extra 10% farther.
    • Pace Problem
      Do I think our GM and Pro would adopt what I am suggesting as a course policy? No.  
    • New shoes
      I am looking for a new pair pair of golf shoes.  Since I am a cheapskate trying to stay under $100. Any ideas I like to walk and need them to be waterproof. 
    • Pace Problem
      You (or your mangers) still don't seem to understand that catching another group and playing through them is slower for both groups (and for any groups following them) than if they are all simply required by policy to keep the pace.  The rules are just swell, but playing through should only be something that happens in cases with extenuating circumstances, not a regular habit.  The Rules of Golf were never intended to be used as an excuse for a chronic inability to keep pace with the course. When the course allows certain groups make a habit of playing so slowly that other groups overtake them and have to play through, then you have failed in establishing and maintaining an effective pace of play policy.  That policy is mired in a time warp from the era when courses were never full.  Those days no longer exist and different steps must be taken if a course is really serious about their pace of play.  It's apparent that your course is more concerned about the minority than they are about the majority.  I hope that doesn't eventually bite them in the behind.
    • Pace Problem
      Again, that's been our tactic for seven years, and has not generally worked.  There is not a suggestion made in this thread that we don't do or haven't tried to speed slow groups up.  Some do, but mostly slow groups stay slow. As a rule of thumb, marshaling 18 holes takes about an hour.  If you attempt to "teach" the first time around, and then discover that you're a bad teacher or the slow group is a bad student when you come back around, by the time you "enforce", you have lost half a round of golf and you have forced faster groups to play the slower group's pace. When I see a group going to 9 at 2 1/2 hours, I tend to say, 'Oh, shit." to myself, because I know we've lost the Pace and it's next to impossible to get it back until that group has left the course.  Sadly, because of staffing cutbacks, that's often the case.  When I say something to the GM or Pro like, "If you want a good pace, you have to be out there from the beginning," it is not received well. If, OTOH, our policy is Pace has Priority on the Course, let faster groups play through, and that is what they hear when they pay, and from the Starter, and that's what the sign in the carts' signholder says, they have no leg to stand on the first time the marshal comes by and sees groups piled up behind a slow group. Yeah, I know, it's different than what everyone's used to. But if you always do what you've always done, you always get what you've always got.    
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. TessaEdin
      TessaEdin
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries