• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
power aid

wedge setup configuration

10 posts in this topic

I'm having a hard time figuring out my setup . mizuno 825 pros ,9i-41 pw-45, gw- 50. when do players actually abandon the iron set and then go with Cleveland's or vokies ? keep or drop the set pw-gw ? then if I have a wedge loft changed , it affects the bounce also. for example I would want a 55 so should if choose a 54 or 56 to have loft changed ? input appreciated
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

to me as long as all your wedges are the same brand and model, that's what matters the most, because its a consistant feel. I personally think cleveland and titleist are way beyond all other wedges, especially with options. Its crazy how technical wedges can get. I would go to Titleist website and look through there information on wedges, they got some good guidelines for setting up different wedge configurations.

Basically standard club changes are 0.5" on club length and 4 degrees of loft.

So if your PW is a 48, with a 35" shaft, your next wedge would be 52 with a 34.4" Now you can do the same bump, but usually you can keep the same shaft length and just go another 4 degrees of loft. but basically unless your messing around with clublength, 4-5 degrees will give a good gap.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I agree with what Saevel25 says and what like to add.... If you were fitted for your 9i-4i then you also want the lie angle to match your irons. Saevel has already covered having the same shaft, bounce, length gapping, and degree interval,  in your wedges based off of your pitching wedge, which is why he recommends the same wedges but different lofts. Good Luck.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4-5* between your wedges is a pretty big gap.  3* is more a more universally-accepted gapping.  If your set came with a 45* PW, I personally wouldnt go any weaker than 47* if you go with a blade-style wedges because its going to give you a huge gap between your 9-iron and PW.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i am at least a 4 wedge setup . with all my irons sets I have had before I have always chosen to get the pw and gw to match the iron set and then whatever I choose for my sw and lw . usually cleveland wedges . is this common or would u say more choose to have all 4 wedges the same brand/model ? with the mizuno 825p would the pw and gw say have a little more forgiveness than say the cleveland rtx wedges ? by looking at my 4 wedge makeup, all cleveland rtx, I would have to have a 46 changed to a 45 , get a 50 , either take a 54 or 56 and changed to 55--, which way do I go here bend down or up ? , then a 60 . this is just to keep 5 degrees between my wedges .
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4-5° isn't bad depending on the manufacturer. 2-3° is good for higher lofted irons, but majority of irons are 4° difference with half a inch change in shaft length. For wedges you can run into the problem of having same shaft lengths, so 4° will give you a slight smaller gap, but its tough to gap 5° with traditional 4° being the standard for so long,

http://www.vokey.com/vokes-notebook/pages/wedge-fitting.aspx

Here is a good site for fitting wedges, and how Vokey goes about it.

Lets look at some common iron configurations

Mizuno's MP-64's

9-iron 42°

PW 46°

Mizuno JPX 825 Pro's

9-iron 41°

PW 45°

Callaway Razr XF

9-iron 40°

PW 44°

AW 49°

As you can see, they vary, manufacturers mess around with shaft lengths and clubhead design to allow them to get a range of lofts for the same iron labeling. This can get you if you compare similar irons, sometimes a 7 iron from one company might be half a club length more than anothers

But if we were to look at wedge profiles for these three, at least how i would go about it

Mizuno MP-64 - 50°, 54°, 58/60°

Mizuno JPX - 50°, 54°, 58/60° (this one is tougher because of the 5° gap, but you can always have these bent 1° stronger)

Callaway - 52°, 56°, 60°

Before the last decade majority of irons would have there PW be at 48°, that's why the common wedges would be Gap wedge at 52°, Sandwedge at 56°, and Lob wedge at 60°

But today you really got to look up your specs and match what you want to do. This is also personal preference on chipping style. If you are a shorter hitter, you might go for less wedges because you might need a few hybrids to extend your range. Or you might be a person who uses the hole bag to chip, like using a 5 iron for a chip and run, so you might go with less wedges, or you might be a one wedge chipper and forgo a lob wedge. Or you might like to have 4 wedges.

Basically it comes down to how your irons above your wedges are set up, and how what your style of game is. Figure those two out, and you can set up a solid wedge set.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by saevel25

Basically standard club changes are 0.5" on club length and 4 degrees of loft.

So if your PW is a 48, with a 35" shaft, your next wedge would be 52 with a 34.5"...

A couple of things to consider. The half-inch/4* is standard for your numbered irons, and delivers 10-12 yards difference between clubs for the average golfer. When you get into wedges, things change.

Make sure you look at the spec sheets for the irons, and specialty wedge model you're trying to patch in.

For wedges which match iron sets, you might end up with 1/4" difference between shaft lengths. Sometimes, the SW and LW will have the same shaft length.

For specialty wedges, you often drop to 1/4" length differences between wedge categories, or 1/8" in some recent Cleveland wedges. Less difference in shaft length means the distance between wedges will be less.

Club designer Ralplh Maltby discusses wedge fitting on his website: http://ralphmaltby.com/17

Most people go with a PW matching their iron set, and add in specialty wedges of a different brand and model, or different model.

Also, the iron may play hotter or softer than the specialty wedge. I carry a 46* X20 Tour PW.  This PW flies about 12 yards farther than my Cle CG14 50* GW, even though they have the same shafl length. The PW is a little hotter than the CG wedges.

Some people pick up a 6* loft gap at their PW, and may have a 42* 9i, and go specialty wedges in 48*, 54*, 60* so they can get by with three wedges. In this case, the 48* PW would match the SW and LW. (For example, all three Vokey or all three Cle CG).

Once you get the wedges, you can test them out to get a "yardstick" for how far each wedge flies on quarter, half and 3/4 swings.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

My MP57 PW is 47*, and I carry an additional 50, 54 and 58.  To be honest, I rarely use my 50* wedge and could easily drop it from the bag without effecting my game much if at all.  Most people keep the matching Pitching Wedge to their irons because typically they are played like a 10 iron and used for just full shots, and you go to the specialty wedges for anything else.

My Scratch 8620 D/D 58* is my favorite wedge I've ever owned, and I've got an entire bag of wedges here at the house from Cleveland, Mizuno, Vokeys and Snake Eyes.  Anything within 80 yards, it's my first choice unless I'm just off the fringe, where I'll use a 9 iron.  I like it so much that I am going to order a 50* and 53* to match and put my current Mizunos in the bag with the rest of them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if I were needed to have a wedge loft changed , say to 55 degrees , what should I use here a 54-12 or 56-14 ? changing loft would affect the bounce also , correct ? I'm not a big digger , and the sand here is typical sandbox crap .
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if I were needed to have a wedge loft changed , say to 55 degrees , what should I use here a 54-12 or 56-14 ? changing loft would affect the bounce also , correct ? I'm not a big digger , and the sand here is typical sandbox crap .

In your example it would make no difference. When you change the loft, you change the bounce by the same amount. If you increase loft you also increase the bounce, and vice versa. In your example you're going to end up with a 55-13 either way.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • How do I organize a charity tournament to be a raging success?
      26 and a stroke? Holy smokes. Very sorry to hear that.  I have no idea how to organize a tournament but I have played in my share. The best ones are scrambles where you can organize your own team. The outcome has rarely ever mattered to us as long as we were well fed. Find a local restaurant (usually a bbq place) that wants to help you out and give a discount for advertising and spend your money there. Everyone will love to come for a good meal. Some nice prizes and maybe a raffle with some local companies offering you something if you are able to convince them it is worth it to give something to the cause.  Another thing I have seen work well is a silent auction at the end with donated items. I donated airline miles of which I have tons and 100,000 miles went for $205. Free gift for me and the cause got $205. 
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Haha - I get a couple of reputation points for a post and then go and have a blow up hole. Good drive, left myself 145 in down hill (8i), aimed #deadcenter, pulled 2 shots 25 yards left out of bounds, made 9 (+5) in a 9 hole round of (+11). A better way to avoid blow up holes - play stableford!
    • Donald Trump for president?
      Come on now, that's a bit uncalled for in Bernies case.  His political ideals might be way left, but he is at least honest and virtuous.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I'll have to examine your other post closer. That's a good point to consider about the expansion to Continental Europe. Largely explains the poor showing of UK & Ireland in the 60's with many top tier European players not eligible. But considering the 200 million U.S. population base to 63 million in the U.K. & Ireland at the time, the latter did surprisingly well if population base was all that matters. IMO an established competitive golfing culture matters in producing elite players too. Those same European players excluded from Ryder Cup were always eligible for the Majors. The Ryder Cup is also a limited field event. It concentrates the 12 top players of the European Tour. From what I've read, depth of field is still stronger for the 'typical' PGA event, though some non-major Euro events are now stronger than some of the 'minor' PGA events. That is a significant change in Euro competitiveness from the 60's. To some extent that 30% drop sounds like it could be due to simply more international players occupying slots in the fields. If the period you mention covers when majors started to use OWGR for automatic qualification that has some not insignificant inherent issues in terms of strength of field. Having a guaranteed start rather than having to qualify would certainly make for an easier decision to travel to the event. But I'm not arguing against the policy decision facilitating international competition with a little points boost just trying to point out that field strength may not have been as weak in Jack's day as you seem to think. Compared to his peers, which is really the only thing I think you can do without speculative nuance I agree there's no question he's the best golfer. I'm really just arguing that standouts of their caliber (so many more wins so many more majors) than typical players among already elite fields are so rare, that I expect they both represent near the achievable human pinnacle in golf talent, which I don't think really differs within a few generations. The nuances of comparison across eras is interesting to me so I'll debate relative points, but I'm against arguments undervaluing Jack's achievements against 'weak fields'. They both faced very stiff competition.   I'm not dissing Jack. I think his achievements are amazing. I also think the same of Tiger's record. IMO winning percentage per start in the Majors is a very significant stat and Tiger has that in his favor (they are both top 10 and within ~ 2% of each other's number). That number is not the official one for Jack though, I truncated his Major starts to end at age 47, which I think is a reasonable cutoff for competitiveness. If Tiger competes as long as Jack did his major win % (up to age 47) might stay about the same, increase, or decrease (more likely), but he certainly won't match the 18 Majors if he doesn't get like 22+ more major starts between now and age 47.
    • Wedges, Bounce, and Ground Conditions
      Typically more bounce (or a "healthy" amount of bounce) helps in any condition.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. glinks
      glinks
      (43 years old)
  • Blog Entries