Jump to content
IGNORED

Making a transition to blades, recommended or not?


Note: This thread is 4102 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I'm just curious as to when everybody thinks it would be beneficial to start using blades or other players irons. I use callaway x20s and I've gotten to the point where I think I need to try some players irons because I am learning to shape the ball and my belief is that "game improvement" irons would make it harder to purposely shape a shot because they are designed to be more forgiving with mishits. I rarely chunk or top shots with my irons and I consistently hit them flush so I'm sure I could use the blades but how much different are they? Like if I get some nice titleist mb 712s, will they be ridiculously hard to hit or will I be fine if I'm already a good ball striker? Thanks everybody! Go gamecocks!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites


The golfing gods made it very clear to me that I should take advantage of technology and not to romanticize the classics.  I played with a forged gap wedge for many years trying to get it dialed in, so I could "feel" the difference.  Half of my strikes felt terrible or mis-hit.  Not from a perspective of results, but my hands just stung most of the time.  I picked up a cavity back ,and hit it three times without feeling that classic harshness.  Just what I needed.

My advice is this, if you want to hit blades because you have the swing to accommodate them, have fun, if not, stick to game improvement technology.

Driver: Callaway RAZR Fit - 9.5* Stiff

Woods: TaylorMade R11S - 3W Stiff, TaylorMade R11 Ti - 5W Stiff

Irons: Callaway X-12 - 3-PW Uniflex

Wedges: TaylorMade Rocketballz 50* AW - Cleveland 588 RTG 56* SW

Putter: Odyssey Sabertooth 2

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
Originally Posted by KiawahConnor

I'm just curious as to when everybody thinks it would be beneficial to start using blades or other players irons.

I use callaway x20s and I've gotten to the point where I think I need to try some players irons because I am learning to shape the ball and my belief is that "game improvement" irons would make it harder to purposely shape a shot because they are designed to be more forgiving with mishits.

I rarely chunk or top shots with my irons and I consistently hit them flush so I'm sure I could use the blades but how much different are they? Like if I get some nice titleist mb 712s, will they be ridiculously hard to hit or will I be fine if I'm already a good ball striker?

Thanks everybody! Go gamecocks!!!

Personally don't think it's a good idea for anyone higher than a 3 handicap to use blades and even then....  Couple reasons: soles tend to be thinner with blades, so if contact is an issue, which it is for most players, blades will be less room for error.  Also the soles have less bounce/camber compared to other types of irons.  Again less room for error.

In terms of work-ability, the center of gravity location can shift slightly from GI irons to mid size to muscle backs, but that will have a small impact on the work-ability of an iron. It's more to do with the trajectory (height) of a shot, but you could make the argument that even that is subtle.  Point is a blade doesn't necessarily give you more ease to shape shots.

A lot of the best players in the world aren't using blades.  Having said that Callaway saw a big shift in their players going to the X-Prototype blades because of the added camber/bounce to the soles.  But there isn't a "time" a player needs to switch to blades.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Personally don't think it's a good idea for anyone higher than a 3 handicap to use blades and even then....  Couple reasons: soles tend to be thinner with blades, so if contact is an issue, which it is for most players, blades will be less room for error.  Also the soles have less bounce/camber compared to other types of irons.  Again less room for error. In terms of work-ability, the center of gravity location can shift slightly from GI irons to mid size to muscle backs, but that will have a small impact on the work-ability of an iron. It's more to do with the trajectory (height) of a shot, but you could make the argument that even that is subtle.  Point is a blade doesn't [COLOR=222222] necessarily give you more ease to shape shots. [/COLOR] [COLOR=222222] A lot of the best players in the world aren't using blades.  Having said that Callaway saw a big shift in their players going to the X-Prototype blades because of the added camber/bounce to the soles.  But there isn't a "time" a player needs to switch to blades. [/COLOR]

Speaking of Callaway, they mentioned while we were there that JB Holmes was seriously considering a switch to the X Hot irons, which are cast and would fall into the GI category. Very similar to AP1's which Zach Johnson played last year. Mark Wilson won bob hope with i20's and the list goes on and on. (Those are just the ones off the top of my head). Point being what mike said ... You never really NEED blades unless you want them. EDIT: Sorry, I meant to say X Hot Pros . (X Hots look like Big Berthas or Diablos)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by KiawahConnor

I am learning to shape the ball and my belief is that "game improvement" irons would make it harder to purposely shape a shot because they are designed to be more forgiving with mishits.

I rarely chunk or top shots with my irons and I consistently hit them flush so I'm sure I could use the blades but how much different are they? Like if I get some nice titleist mb 712s, will they be ridiculously hard to hit or will I be fine if I'm already a good ball striker?

1. Shaping - the data may have changed since I read about shaping shots in the late 90's-early 00's, but the thinking was that the size of the clubhead from heel to toe influenced shaping. The larger the size, the more difficult it was to shape.

2. The sole width, camber, and bounce (the grind) of the club head will have a large influence on ease.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

1. Shaping - the data may have changed since I read about shaping shots in the late 90's-early 00's, but the thinking was that the size of the clubhead from heel to toe influenced shaping. The larger the size, the more difficult it was to shape.

This is mostly in the height direction, there's only a negligible difference (virtually none) side to side with on-center contact.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4102 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,013 2/6 🟨⬜⬜🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Thought I was gonna be a big shot today...  🙂    Nice Job!
    • Cool here's my tweak, "If a player’s ball lies in the general area and there is interference from exposed tree roots or exposed rocks that are in the fairway or 1 club length from the fairway the tree roots and exposed rocks are treated as ground under repair. The player may take free relief under Rule 16.1b.[But relief is not allowed if the tree roots only interfere with the player’s stance.]
    • I would never do the extended warranty on the $50 slow cooker.  I also routinely reject the extended service plans on those toys we buy for the grand-kids.  I do consider them on higher cost items and will be more likely to get one if the product has a lot of "Electronic Tech" that is often the problem longer-term.  I also consider my intended length of ownership & usage.  If my thought is it would get replaced in 2-3 years then why bother but if I hope to use it for 10 years then more likely to get the extension. I did buy out a lease about a year ago.  Just prior to the lease end date the tablet locked up and would not function.  I got it repaired under the initial warranty and would not have bought it out if they had not been able to fix it since IMO once electronic issues start in a car they can be hard to track down & fix.  They did fix it but when I bought out the lease I paid up for the extended warranty the would cover electronic failures because my intent is to keep that car for another 8-10 years and I just do not trust the electronics to last.  Last week the touch screen went black and was unresponsive.  It reset on the 2nd time I restarted the car but that is exactly how the last malfunction started.  I fully expect to have a claim on that on repair under the extended warranty.  I do not recall the exact cost to fix last time since I did not pay it but I think it was @ $700-$800 and I suspect that will be higher next time.
    • Have you looked at Model Local Rule F-9 Relief from Tree Roots in or Close to Fairway?  You could extend this to cover exposed rocks.  The rule is recommended to be used only for areas relatively near the fairway, a player who hits a shot 20 yards in the woods doesn't really deserve relief.   Players can always take Unplayable Ball relief, they're not required to play it from a rock or a root.  Of course, they hate to take the penalty stroke too.
    • I agree with @klineka, you're clearly doing something right.  Its always going to be a bit of a guessing game if you don't have any scoring history.  On the other hand, understanding that it takes only 54 holes to establish an actual handicap, and they have about 6 weeks in which to play and post enough scores, I don't think its at all unreasonable to require them to have an official handicap before they become eligible for prizes.  I don't know how you structure the fees for the series of competitions, but if its possible they'll play with the group without being eligible for prizes, you could consider a way to let them do that without contributing to the prize pool.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...