Jump to content
IGNORED

Last paralell (A6) to Impact (A7)


Note: This thread is 4112 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Saw a new video by Chuck Martin today that dealt with the move from A6 to A7 being one involving pulling the handle up and in (towards you) while extending. Is this the same thing as parametric acceleration? When is extending after regaining flexion too early? Are these the same (or just similar) concepts that S&T; advocates? If just similar, what's different?

Thanks

Hogan1949

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Hogan1949

Saw a new video by Chuck Martin today that dealt with the move from A6 to A7 being one involving pulling the handle up and in (towards you) while extending. Is this the same thing as parametric acceleration? When is extending after regaining flexion too early? Are these the same (or just similar) concepts that S&T; advocates? If just similar, what's different?

Thanks

Hogan1949

Oops....parallel

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I like the extension piece, but I am not sure about the pulling the hands in part. Can you link the video?

Dana does a nice job explaining the A6-A8 parts here for S&T; (or at least my understanding).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQSkhj1upLY&feature;=player_embedded

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Hogan1949

Mike,

Couldn't open the Dana D video. Here's a link to Martin Chuck's video. B. Manzella talked about a similar concept of pulling the handle up and in. Is this a CP release?

http://www.revolutiongolf.com/Vip/DailyTips/Video/2109529076001

CP involves lots of pieces. Erik did a pretty solid explanation of CP vs. CF but I cannot find it and I searched pretty hard. Maybe somebody else with better searching skills than me can bring it up. It is not the complete explanation, but it is really really good. I also am forced to admit I have tried my best to follow what Manzella is talking about with Project 1.68 and I was excited to see what was going to be discussed, but in the end I have not seen much that will make me play any better. I was hoping for a simple 1.68 video that I can watch to understand it. Now it seems they are arguing about hips and stalling and I cannot keep up.

Originally Posted by Hogan1949

I've actually seen that DD video. I found the thought of keeping the left shoulder low in the DS to be confusing.

As I understand it, the idea here is that at A6 you should have the same flexion as at A1. Then from A6 to A8 is all extension as Dana shows in the video. I rarely think about pulling the shoulder down in the DS, that might have been a specific feel for the guy Dana was teaching. I have much more of an issue getting out of extension. I fake it with a form of early extension and then just stay there until A9, which is bad. I am much better than 2 years ago, but still a ways to go.


Originally Posted by Hogan1949

Not sure if my link to Martin Chuck video from Revolution Golf can be opened. Let me know if it can't.

I can't but a good friend of mine who is a pro really likes what Martin is teaching so I will try and log in and see what I can find over there.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Hogan1949

Not sure if my link to Martin Chuck video from Revolution Golf can be opened. Let me know if it can't.

The video "Feel the Snap to Unleash the Power of Your Golf Swing" is really similar to Dana's video. I think Dana's also incorporates getting the weight forward which is important and Martin does not discuss that. The moving the handle up as he describes it has nothing to do with CP or CF but more to do with releasing PA2 and PA3.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4112 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Agree. The next omission needs to be that ridiculous team concept. Nobody cares about a team when they really don’t represent anything except being a group of diminished morality and/or washed up pro golfers. Or wait, we’ve also got total nobodies who’ve accomplished nothing who now get a participation trophy! Doesn’t that sound invigorating!
    • LIV moving to 72 holes is a subtle admission that 54 holes was nothing but a joke all along. 
    • I was going to start a thread, but this seems like the place.  Yesterday I played my matchplay match at my local club.  My opponent is a notorious sandbagger by reputation.  The pro once pulled his tournament rounds from the past several years and said that it is impossible his tournament rounds are legit based on his handicap. here is what happened last night.  I am getting 4 shots from him.  His current handicap index is 15.3 i shot 45 on the front.   Was down 4 after nine, he had three birdies and shot even par. I was closed out on thirteen, we halved with a bogey.  That bogey put him one over par for his round.   He then took a triple on 14 and then left. As if that wasn’t bad enough, he lied about his score.   I wrote down on my scorecard what the score was.  He put higher values that didn’t affect the outcome of the match to pad his score and apparently make it not look as obvious.   He shot 36 on the front, but claimed 40.  The higher values for his score were in the online scoring app our club uses.  He did it this way: I won #7. He had a 2 foot putt for par that if he made would still lose the hole.   He picked up and said it didn’t matter since I won.  He took a 5 instead of a 4 after picking up a gimme. on #8 his approach shot on this par 4 was 8 inches.  I verbally conceded the putt but I had hit into a hazard.  I finished the hole with a 6.  Instead of birdie he put in for par. on #9, another par 4, his approach was to 18 inches.  I missed my par putt and then knowing how close I verbally conceded the putt.  I missed my bogey putt, he never conceded mine.  Instead of birdie he put down a bogey. He padded his score by 4 shots on the front.  And then did again on 10.  I rinsed one and made 6 on a par 4.  I putted out and he was fishing balls out of the lake so I drove off to the next tee.  He had 15 feet laying two but claimed a 5.     love to know the odds of a 15 handicap being even thru 12 holes on a round of golf. 
    • They've been chuckling since they hooked the shark. I think Greg doesn't realize the jokes on him.
    • to confirm, I'll need a hotel for Friday and Saturday, planning to share with you
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...