Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
tuffluck

Need some Driver selection tips

6 posts in this topic

i've been in the market for a driver for some time.  i have a nike currently that i hit consistently but put a ton of spin on (average 3800), which causes a lot of ballooning.  i live in north texas where 10+mph winds is just expected, so i need a penetrating ball flight that cuts through the wind.  i.e. i need a driver with less spin.

i've tried all the mainstream drivers with similar spin numbers.  the only driver that seems to work for me is the ping anser, 8.5 with stiff ahana shaft.  though the weird thing is that on launch monitors i can hit either 2600rpm spin, or 3800rpm spin (or right around).  both hits go pretty far, but i can't tell why the discrepancy.  i'm thinking maybe it's because i'm not *used* to the driver yet, and that when i warm up to it i'll see more consistent numbers.

question is which numbers would be more consistent, the low 2800rpms or the high 3800rpms?  if it's the former, the anser driver is worth the $$.  if not, i should stick to my nike driver since the results wouldn't change.  can anyone help me with this?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

The low the dynamic loft the more positive AoA will be need to get the maximum distance. Lets say your AoA is -2 , dynamic loft is 10.5, your swing speed is 100MPH your launch angle would be about 7 degrees, spin around 3000RPM and you wolud hit it about 220 yards.

If AoA and swing speed was the same but the dynamic loft was 8.5 your launch angle would be about 5.5, spin around 2200RPM and you would hit it about 200 yards, a 20 yard loss. Now on the other hand if the AoA was +2 you would hit it about 226 yards, so you would have to hit up on it more to get the distance you want with a lower lofted driver. If the dynamic loft was 10.5 and the AoA was +2 you hit it about 236 yards.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

on the launch monitor i was hitting the 8.5 about 265y.  i hit my current 9.5 about 265y, just with more spin.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by tuffluck

on the launch monitor i was hitting the 8.5 about 265y.  i hit my current 9.5 about 265y, just with more spin.

.

Is that carry or total?

The numbers in my post are carry and the ones on the launch monitors add 30 yards of roll.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

carry for me is about 250.  i literally get 5-10y at most of roll from the amount of spin i put on my drives, hence why i need to lower the spin numbers.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by tuffluck

carry for me is about 250.  i literally get 5-10y at most of roll from the amount of spin i put on my drives, hence why i need to lower the spin numbers.

Ok, The only way you are going to lower the spin is to get a lower lofted club. but if you do you need to have a positive AoA to get maximum distance.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • My Swing (b101)
      It's just feeling a little bit more natural than it used to and I'm not stepping on the course with 5 or more swing thoughts, which is nice! I don't think it'll take much work getting back to making progress and I'm definitely seeing that some of the changes I've made have stuck - ball flight is really high compared to what I'm used to and the ball turns right to left about 50% of the time and stays straight for 30%. It's the 20% of rubbish, either duck hooks or generally wayward tee shots that I want to clear up, which is going to be this morning's target on the range. I didn't end up hitting the range yesterday - a mate texted to ask to play a round, so I went for that. What was obvious is that the little 9 hole course, where I don't need anything above a 4 iron, has been great for my iron play, but that the 3 wood, driver and course management need a bit of a refresher course. Shot an 86 with a ridiculous 7 penalty strokes (4 on one tough par 3), which says it all really as I don't normally take any! It is a tight track though and there is OB all over the place, but no excuse for the few 'head off' moments which prevented me scoring well. It was match play as well so I guess that's part of it... In short summary: Driving/3 wood - pretty poor and I'm just not comfortable over the ball with those clubs. On a longer course, I'd have struggled. Long irons - good, bar that atrocity of a par 3, where I think I'll just aim way left next time and take the safe miss. Both of those were actually really nice strikes, but went dead straight rather than drawing like I had expected. Still, my fault entirely for aiming towards the trouble  Mid-short irons - mostly pretty good actually. Put 6/14 approaches from outside 100 yards to (3/4 from within 100) inside 15 yards and bar two long bunker shots, the rest were manageable. Putting - really pleased again; I probably only made one that I wouldn't have expected (birdie on 13), but there's a lot of break on the greens and I thought it was pretty decent for a first time out in a while. http://www.gamegolf.com/player/benpage101/round/930037 Overall, pretty close to where I'd want it to be, but a better decision on 6, some better drives and a bit more luck on odd holes (like 16) and it'd have been a great round. I'd take that for the first time in ages. Should be able to post some video this afternoon.
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      And also, "speculation" is what the thread is all about! Sure, I'm placing the Tour guys on a pedestal but they DESERVE it. Yes "Golf is Hard", but those guys are GOOD. Low 60s are very much a possibility in any tournament they tee it up in, let alone on a public course that was designed with the average golfer in mind. Let's give credit where credit is due! If all the players from 75-125 on the money list decided to go out and play a new course (of "moderate difficulty" for amateurs) every week for the next 2 months, course records would be getting smashed all over the place. They might shoot the odd 70 or 72, but you darn well bet there would be a lot of 63's and 64's in there too. Regardless of poor course conditions, lack of course knowledge or anything like that, they are gonna make birdies in droves and they are going to go low!
    • The this math does not compute thread
      I was at a garage sale with my son who was like 10 years old at the time. The seller had a box full of cheap toys with a handwritten sign on the box that read "$1 each, or 2 for $3".  I nudged my son and pointed to the sign with my eyes (because the seller was standing right there). He glanced down at the sign and immediately grinned and shook his head in disbelief. And don't get me going on auctions. People will pay more for used crap than they know they would if purchased brand new, simply because they get caught up in a bidding war. The best part is listening to them try and justify it afterwards.
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      The odds of him shooting -32 would be slim, but not impossible. Those guys absolutely demolish a handful of the easier courses (ie. Kapalua, the old rotation for the Las Vegas Invitational, the old rotation for the Bob Hope, TPC Scottsdale before they toughened it up,  North Course at Torrey, etc.) and scores of ~ -30 haven't been terribly uncommon at some events. But I think the PGA Tour and the Web.Com Tour seem to be trying to get away from insanely low numbers and are moving tournaments away from some of the old venues that can't keep up with how far  they hit the ball now, and renovating other courses to beef them up. I recall the Tour players voted to eliminate the TPC Stadium course at PGA West in the late 80's from tournanent play because they thought it was "too hard" and this year when they used it again it seemed to be quite playable for them. In fact, they seemed to have no issues making their way around the course at all. That speaks to the quality and depth of the fields nowadays.  That being said - no, I wouldn't expect a -32 total. But it definitely wouldn't shock me either.  On a side note, I would be really interested to see this type of experiment revisited. This thread has fuelled some great speculation and debate, so thank you guys for playing along!
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries