• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
robrey85

Top Flite Gamer v2 and Bridgestone e5

13 posts in this topic

I know there are a bunch of compare and contrast threads across the intarweb but out of curiosity I ordered an ammo box of the Gamer v2's. All the great reviews and thoughts I read about them I figured, what could really go wrong? Not to mention, with my handicap, it probably doesn't matter. I currently play Bridgestone e5s and I just received my Gamer v2's today. I had my clubs in my truck from this mornings range session so I decided to grab my putter out of my truck as well as an e5 and do a little comparing of how it feels off my putter. I putted for probably the last hour of "work" since we were dead. When I got home, I grabbed my LW and tried some pitch/chip/flop shots into my couch with both balls.

I'm not that good at golf and/or knowledgeable so I wanted to put my thoughts on here as well as hear what others who have played both balls have to say.

So my thoughts are, with the putting of both balls, the e5 feels heavier and less responsive than the Gamer v2. I feel like I really had a grip on what was happening when I hit the Gamer v2. When I pulled out the LW, it was the same feeling. I feel like they have similar spin off the carpet but my differ in thicker rough or with more power/swing speed. The shot I was able to hit were only soft ones since I was going maybe like 10 feet to my couch cushion. I felt again like the Gamer v2 was more responsive and like I just felt more feedback..*shrugs* I can't wait to play these balls this weekend on the course and see what happens with my thoughts about the ball.

I have no idea how that all will sound or if any of it makes sense but they're just my thoughts.

What do those who have played both of these balls think?

--

Best,

Robert

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Let me just say too, I'm not trying to get into a "which ball is better thread war", I'm just trying to hear what others thoughts are so keep the trolling out of here.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by robrey85

I know there are a bunch of compare and contrast threads across the intarweb but out of curiosity I ordered an ammo box of the Gamer v2's. All the great reviews and thoughts I read about them I figured, what could really go wrong? Not to mention, with my handicap, it probably doesn't matter. I currently play Bridgestone e5s and I just received my Gamer v2's today. I had my clubs in my truck from this mornings range session so I decided to grab my putter out of my truck as well as an e5 and do a little comparing of how it feels off my putter. I putted for probably the last hour of "work" since we were dead. When I got home, I grabbed my LW and tried some pitch/chip/flop shots into my couch with both balls.

I'm not that good at golf and/or knowledgeable so I wanted to put my thoughts on here as well as hear what others who have played both balls have to say.

So my thoughts are, with the putting of both balls, the e5 feels heavier and less responsive than the Gamer v2. I feel like I really had a grip on what was happening when I hit the Gamer v2. When I pulled out the LW, it was the same feeling. I feel like they have similar spin off the carpet but my differ in thicker rough or with more power/swing speed. The shot I was able to hit were only soft ones since I was going maybe like 10 feet to my couch cushion. I felt again like the Gamer v2 was more responsive and like I just felt more feedback..*shrugs* I can't wait to play these balls this weekend on the course and see what happens with my thoughts about the ball.

I have no idea how that all will sound or if any of it makes sense but they're just my thoughts.

What do those who have played both of these balls think?

--

Best,

Robert

One has a urethane cover - e5, and one does not - Gamer.

I have no issues with the e5 off the putter. It is a urethane cover and one does not compress the ball off the putter. So I tend to smile when I hear these interesting comments about rolling a ball off the putter.

Around the greens, the e5 will offer more wedge spin - urethane offers an advantage.

The e5 is not my ball of choice. The old models felt firm off full shots. They have a newer model for 2013. Here is some info:

"While the E5 is a two-piece golf ball, it features a urethane cover, a trademark of higher-priced, multi-layer golf balls. Not only does the urethane cover help the E5 spin like higher-priced golf balls around the green — it adds much needed spin with the driver as well.

The E5 also lacks the spin-reducing middle layer featured on the E6 and E7 models, which will give golfers a higher launch and more spin with their woods, hybrids, irons and wedges than the other balls in the line.

Aerodynamics: As with all the 2013 E Series golf balls, the E5 features Bridgestone’s new 226-dimple pattern. It has four less dimples than the previous pattern, which allows the surface coverage to be expanded by 2.5 percent. The E5’s dimples are also shallower than those on the 2011 E5, which gives the ball a higher trajectory for longer carry distances."

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

The urethane cover of the E5 really puts it over the top for me.  It spins like crazy but still has a soft enough core than almost anyone can compress it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience is the same as Robrey85. For whatever reason, I never liked the e5.  I get better short game spin off the gamer.

I think the only bridgestone ball i've really liked is the 330-RXS.  I think that's as good a ball as any.  But the e5, just never felt good to me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience is the same as Robrey85. For whatever reason, I never liked the e5.  I get better short game spin off the gamer.   I think the only bridgestone ball i've really liked is the 330-RXS.  I think that's as good a ball as any.  But the e5, just never felt good to me.

I think the Gamer's dimple design helps with spin alot.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How would the Gamer's dimple design help with spin?  That doesnt make any sense.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The TF Gamer V2 suprised the sh!t out of me - Great  length (not surprising), and very soft and spinny (very surprising). The ONLY thing I don't like about them is when someone in my group asks 'what ball are you hitting', and I have to mutter 'Top Flight' under my breath so everyone else doesn't hear

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol, yeah it's a great ball for the money. I expected to hate it but I liked it a lot. Just bought a box of the Gamer Tour to try. Hope the snow stays away for another day.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by Dave2512

Lol, yeah it's a great ball for the money. I expected to hate it but I liked it a lot. Just bought a box of the Gamer Tour to try. Hope the snow stays away for another day.

Whoa!  I didn't know they expanded the line!  Looks like its a gamer with a soft cover.  And still only $25

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I play Gamer.v2, and got a ball fitting last summer when the Bridgestone people visited my golf club. The fitting data claimed that I would gain 12 yards off the tee if I switched to the three-piece e6. I never have done a 9-hole playing comparison of e6 vs. Gamer.

Comparatively, the e5 is a two-piece, and is billed as a distance ball that will have "great stopping power" because of the urethane cover. I found a couple in the trees during a scramble last year, and tried them with Gamer.v2 on practice green. Limited impression: e5 not as spinny on partial wedge shots.

Gamer.v2 is a three-piece ball with a "soft" ionomer cover, and likewise is billed as delivering both distance and control. A couple of years ago, Golf Digest suggested it was basically a performance ball for mid-spin prices. Also, GD occasionally puts out a useful chart that plots golf balls on an X-Y axis for distance and iron spin. Gamer.v2 was above average on both.

The link below says that urethane is softer than ionomer; above, TopFlite says the Gamer.v2 has a "soft" ionomer cover. Go figure... e5 possibly feels a little harder because it is two-piece?

This link discusses the structure and cover-material characteristics of golf balls:

http://www.americangolf.com/blog/golf-tips/playing-the-correct-golf-ball/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Interesting thoughts. Thanks all. My knowledge about the game is improving and I find myself wanting to know more about everything.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How would the Gamer's dimple design help with spin?  That doesnt make any sense.

Makes perfect sense to me. The dimple in dimple design works with grooves to help create spin. That along with the 3 piece design/softer feel. FWIW, ionomer is another word for surlyn. Anybody want to swap some Gamer V2 for some E5?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Ball likely in casual water but uncertain
      You use the S&D option of Rule 28 at any time you want. It doesn't matter if you can't see it, can't identify it or have it staring you in the face with your ID in dayglo pink. To use either of the other options you have to be able to identify it.
    • The Most Common Swing Flaw
      I'm sure there will be arguments later but there is one piece of information I think a lot of golfers can benefit from. I hope to save some people from buying the online swing tip scams. The most common flaw I see in swings is rotating the forearms one way or the other. Most people don't realize you don't have to rotate your forearms or hands at all in the golf swing, in fact it's better if you don't. The arms can stay just as square as they are at address. The arms follow the rotation of the shoulders on the plane. The arms slightly trail the body on the through swing, creating some additional lag to hip lag, and then eventually they pass the body much later. The club face can stay as square as it was at impact the whole time, many PGA  pros do this. Hunter Mahan is a good example. The only movement the arms really have to make is an up and down one. There is a popular drill where students are told to pick the club straight up from address, hinge it, and rest it on their right shoulder (for righties), and then turn the shoulders 90 degrees and voila, the top of the backswing. To get to this position people will do all kinds of arm and hand contortions all over the place, which is fine. The only problem is, is on the way down, you don't want to be doing these things, and the law of physics states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, so you will likely do going down what you did going up, just in reverse. All you really have to do is rotate your shoulders and let the arms stay connected as they were at address, after all this is why you've spent so much time working on the set up position! The swing is a moving and rotating set up position. Some people actually get to the top perfectly, but then insist on going way beyond parallel, ruining the glorious work! The problem here is, the more your arms lift past your shoulders, the more you have to wait for them to come down, for that huge 1mph arm swing speed boost.  You're of course thinking, why the heck do people do all these things? One reason people do this is because it feels natural, at least that's the reason experienced golfers do it. It feels more repeatable to them, and they like it, it feels good. Power to them. But there are plenty of golfers who do these things that aren't happy with their game, so why do they do it? They do these things because it feels like they can get maximum strength this way. Doing it the efficient way would cost them a lot of power, because their strongest and biggest muscles have not coordinated yet to hit a golf ball. When we do basic things like jumping and lifting, things we've done all our lives, we use the most efficient muscles and most supported ones. But when we have to hit a golf ball, those muscles don't know how to get involved, so we use the smaller, weaker, faster ones, to get the job done with some short term speed. The truth is, we can hit the ball a lot further using the right muscles, but many golfers believe they are hitting it better with whatever move they currently have. They aren't wrong, at the moment they can't hit it with the right muscles, because the right muscles aren't trained. But if they stopped what they are doing and started training the right muscles to support the swing, would they hit it better, faster farther? You bet your ball washer they would. So put down the club, put your arms across your chest like you learned at your very first golf clinic, dig into your hip sockets, and rotate those shoulders. Do away with the crazy arm motions and the bending and unbending at the waist. The 4some behind you will thank you for it.
    • Anybody play golf without keeping score on a regular basis?
      Certainly. Only keep a record of pars in my notebook - nothing else, consequently my index could be anywhere between 16 and 36. Aim is to par every hole on the course at some stage.
    • My Swing (coop6)
      The video you linked of Rory do you see how there is zero club face rotation after the ball?
    • Ball likely in casual water but uncertain
      thanks @ColinL great answer. Question: Are there any times where you can take an unplayable if you can't identify your ball, like if you can't get close enough to read the letters. I thought there were.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries