• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
cwaldo5252

36+ handicapper ball

93 posts in this topic

Am I wasting my money by thinking I have to use a pro v1 when I play because that is what the pros use? For my skill level is the ball even relevant? Should I be OK going to one of these websites that sell recycled golf balls and buy a bucket of 100 for $30 of lightly used balls.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

The ProV1 is a great ball... for the pros (and other good players) that use it. But one of the fantastic things about golf is that you can select much of your equipment to match your skill level (or other criteria) -- whether it's ultra-forgiving irons to help on off-center hits or a golf ball that spins less or has lower compression if those factors help you. I played most of my first year and a half of golf (this was a while back) using a bunch of Top Flite Stratas that I found on eBay - from a reputable seller - in used (but still usable) condition for something that worked out to less than fifty cents per ball, after shipping. For a graduate student living in a high-cost-of-living city, this was a fantastic find, especially given how many executive courses I seemed to find that had water in play on many holes. Is the ball relevant? Yes, although it is not make-or-break for most of us. But this isn't a video game where one ball gives more pluses than the other one, and is thus better. My suggestion is to get usable used golf balls. Find either a variety pack (so you can determine which one(s) you like) or find one you like that isn't the ProV1; if playing a Titleist brand ball is important to you, the DT So/Los are probably better for you, both budget-wise and in terms of how well they fit your game.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I am in the same boat as you and find many balls in the woods try em out and my game sucks even more with the "pro" balls. Been using the dt solo and a vast improvement
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the golf ball is important to all golfers.  It might be more important to low handicappers but still important to find the right one for you.  I have played a lot of balls to find the right one for me.  I need a ball that doesn't have much spin off of the tee.  But I like a ball that spins near the green because I am pretty good with my short irons and wedges.

Lostgolfballs.com is a website I have used to buy used golfballs.  You can buy them and try them out without spending the money on a brand new dozen.  See which ones work best for you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the responses everyone. Guess I will try to find a mix of maybe a couple manufacturers and try them of the tee, with wedges and then on the green.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

agree with all replies.

ProV1's probably aren't the ball for you, even if price isn't an issue. DT SoLo is a solid option - i played them for about 5 years before i found the Bridgestone "e" series. e6 is my current ball and i love it in all aspects (spin, flight, etc.). at $22 a dozen at my local course pro shop, it's hard to beat.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can buy them new, but I'd not go with premium balls unless you're losing a sleeve or less a round. Go soft if possible, not in terms of a urethane cover, but something that won't sting your hands much. This is purely for comfort too, compression isn't a big part of performance for you right now. Just get something soft and cheap and you'll know if you need to move up. E6 is a solid option as well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I use to be find balls in the woods and try them before I bought them - I find that for mey local retail store has AAA used Pro V1s and they, to me are great - I even find a nugget from courses played on the PGA tour
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At 36 handicap you might as well play whatever balls you find and spend your money on lessons, range balls and more rounds.

At 10 handicap I try and stick to playing the same type of ball (not brand but class) but to be honest I can't tell that much of a difference. Just stay away from the old rocks and you'll be fine.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I definitely wouldn't use Pro V1's or any other "top end" ball.

The balls that other users recommended (e6, DT solo, etc) are all good options.

Check out some websites like rockbottomgolf.com where they sell bulk, used balls, for a good price.

As a poster above me mentioned, lessons, and the driving range are a better place to spend the $$.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive used E6's and Noodles in the past and dont have a bad thing to say about either of these balls...except for the E6, just dont believe the sales pitch that its a ball that doesnt spin (because it can still be sliced and diced with the best of them off the tee!!! :).

I get all my balls off ebay or other lake ball online sales and go for the Pro V1's because Im enjoying the stopping power in the greens :)

Regards

Mailman

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by cwaldo5252

Am I wasting my money by thinking I have to use a pro v1 when I play because that is what the pros use? For my skill level is the ball even relevant? Should I be OK going to one of these websites that sell recycled golf balls and buy a bucket of 100 for $30 of lightly used balls.

Yes....................buy 100 balls for $30!    This is exactly what you should do...............

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by BuckeyeNut

Yes....................buy 100 balls for $30!    This is exactly what you should do...............

And ask for an additional discount if you buy 200!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I use the cheap Callaway Warbirds.  If I lose one it's not a big deal, and for me they tend to hold up well.  I hit a PRO V1 just to see how it felt, and it did nothing for me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same here. I got a few dozen Warbirds for Christmas and grabbed a couple more on clearance at Dicks. I had played those and a box of Gamer V2s last summer/fall, and to be honest - at this point, I felt absolutely no difference between the two. Right now my main goal is just keeping the ball in play!

Now, that being said, I hit a few Mojos and THOSE felt like I had teed up a rock I had just found... I'm content with picking up "OK" balls at a good price, because after a round I'm going to be down at LEAST a sleeve of balls, if not more.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I like the Bridgestone e6. It reduces hook and slice spin and is straight and long. It's also very reasonably priced. I play off 16 but this is a great ball for anyone.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At your level It's nuts for you to buy any ball that costs more than about $.75 As several people have mentioned, the Callaway Warbirds are a good ball at a good price. I think I got some at near $.59 each when on sale
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also want to make the point that used golf balls aren't just for beginners!!   I'm a lowCAPPER........... and I won't even buy new balls anymore!  My playing partner opened my eyes to the used  golf ball market 2 years ago, and I haven't purchased new balls since.  I saw what he was hitting and they looked like brand new balls for a fraction of the price.

My last golf ball purchase:  I bought 2 dozen 'only hit once' Penta's...........2 dozen balls for about $32.  What do they sell for new these days?  $40-45 per dozen?

Of course the prices vary greatly depending on the model and condition rating.   If you are a beginner, spending $30 for 100 balls is the best choice.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • 2016 TST Initiative: Forward Tees Tournament
      In Lowest Score Wins, we recommend that golfers play from the forward tees in order to experience "breaking 80" for the first time, or shooting 65, or having more birdie putts than they've ever had, or whatever. This year, in 2016, we're taking it one step farther: we're encouraging everyone here to work with the head pro at your home course (or, if you play multiple courses, the head pro at each of them!) and to set up a serious "Forward Tees Tournament." A Forward Tees Tournament (FTT) will be: FUN! Enlightening Unique Challenging I'll give anyone who creates and/or participates in a FTT this year the special achievement/award seen to the left. Anyone with this award will be entered to win a TST prize to be determined at the end of the year (and I'll do my best to make it a fairly good prize, but that shouldn't be the main reason why anyone should do this). You can play: With or without handicaps. With or without brackets/divisions/flights. Stroke play or match play. 18, 27, 36, 54+ holes. One day, two days, three days. Etc. I think golfers will love playing in this type of tournament. I think it will challenge them to think about how they play and score. I think it will result in faster play, more fun, more birdies, more chances to hit 7-iron into par fives and feel like a Tour player for once, and… lower scores (or higher scores for the dumb players!). So there you have it. What can you do from here? Pledge here in this thread to talk to your head pro. Recruit your buddies and local golfers to play in your event. Work with your head pro to make the event a success. Play in the event! Post here after your tournament has been played to claim your super-exclusive award/achievement! I'm in. I'll be doing this, hopefully at multiple courses this year. Are you?
    • Posting old scores
      I haven't had an official handicap for about 15 years because in the past several I've only been able to play 6-8 times per year. This year I joined a club so that I could play in tournaments and since I need five scores to get a handicap, I entered some scores in GHIN from my last few rounds in 2015 (since I play so rarely, I can remember them). When I was doing this, I forgot to change the date when posting a score from August so it defaulted to today and is now my most recent reported score. GHIN won't let me change the entry but says to "contact my club" to fix it, which seems like a hassle for everyone involved. It's not my lowest score but it's close, so it will probably be included in my handicap calculation for quite a while unless the date is changed. How big of a deal is this?
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Another thing is sometimes to 'give up' on par. For example, as a bogey golfer, if I hit a bad tee shot and end up say 220yds from the hold on a par 4 rather than the usual 130yds, play the hole as if bogey is the new par. You've made the hole more difficult for yourself and rather than trying to hit the green with a 3 wood (a green designed to be hit with a mid/short iron), take 2 shots to get on the green and 2 shots to get down. 1 220yd par 4 is an easy hole (could even make birdie (which becomes par and a great save) whereas a 220 yd par 3, not off the tee, is asking for trouble. Not always the best way to play golf (read Lowest Score Wins) but the best way to avoid blowing up.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Find it yourself please. I don't think that would provide much insight. Courses, technology… all very different. Too many differences. People who qualify for the Opens rarely actually compete for them. The winners and top finishers almost always come from those who qualify automatically. I'm not. Very few foreign golfers played on the PGA Tour in the 60s. It's been steadily growing - and travel has made it easier, too - through to now. And even now we're starting to see Asian golfers really take over. The only Asian golfer many could name who competed against Nicklaus was Isao Aoki. Maybe Jumbo Ozaki. I'm just talking about the number of golfers. There are a ton more now. I don't care. I realize perhaps your condition forces you to take everything literally, but I wasn't being literal here. The PGA Tour takes the best 150 players or so out of X. As X grows, the amount of separation between those top 150 players narrows. We're in a very narrow phase right now. When Jack was playing, the gap was significantly wider. No. Tiger was quite a bit more dominant and "above" even MORE highly competitive fields. Both halves of that are true: Tiger won by larger margins and against stronger fields. I agree. And I've said similar things. No…? You don't say? (On page 273 of a thread doing just that…)? You seem to be the only person who regards WGCs as weaker fields that offer a "competitive break." It says a lot about how others should consider your opinions on strength of field. You're assuming or haven't read many of my posts in this thread, because I've said several times that I'd put it within a few points of 50/50. Maybe 55/45. Hardly what I'd call "strong." Of course we're both "estimating." Tiger's record, IMO, against significantly stiffer competition, puts him ahead. Not by a lot. Not really. If only 30 players had a realistic chance to win a tournament, adding players beyond that 30th player does little to affect the strength of the field. The WGCs could add 200 club professionals that would never win and… the strength of field would remain exactly the same. Where have I said this? Because even if I did, it doesn't support whatever you're trying to force it into supporting here. The odds of a club pro beating anyone on the PGA Tour these days are slim to none. They were slightly more likely back when fewer "A" players played the PGA Tour… like in the 60s and 70s. A "C" player's game almost never varies enough - not for four days - to beat even 10 or 15 "A" players. Here's an opinion, but one I could probably back up if I cared enough to take the time (I do not): a modern WGC has a stronger field than many (perhaps all) of the majors Nicklaus won. I've said this before, and will say it again here: In Jack's day, there were maybe 10-15 "A" players, 25 "B" players, and the rest were "C" players. Today there are 100+ A players and the rest B players. I'm also going to request, mostly because of the number of times I've had to repeat myself in this thread, that you not quote or respond to me, @natureboy, in this thread. I'm not keen on repeating myself about something that, ultimately, I don't care that much about. It is what it is, their records are what they are, and they could only beat the guys they played against.
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Never try to hit through trees, always just get back to the fairway.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries