• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
golfingal

Do I NEED new irons? Really?

7 posts in this topic

At what point does an iron set "wear out" or get so old the tech is too far behind?

I've only been playing golf since about 2005 and upgraded myself to steel shafted Ping G2s early on - so they are nearly that old as well.

I love these irons for the feel, control and distance accuracy* - they are evenly spaced about 10 yards difference per club - which I can add or shave +/- 5 yards per club.

* It doesn't matter how far I hit this-or-that iron if the distance is accurate and reliable.

Workability is good - I typically draw the ball but can produce fades on demand as well, though less reliably.  My biggest mistake with irons is usually overcooking it.

I use the stock set including S wedge which I actually like because it doesn't "dig" so much as others I've tried...  The 3 iron has come out of the bag in lieu of a hybrid.

I play an average of probably 100+ rounds/year and hit a low handicap of 3 last fall - but back up to 8 this spring so far after relocating to a new area and still adjusting.

Now I don't have crazy swing speeds and the ball has never spun backwards on greens for me.  It's hard to hold greens around here however - they are like cement - so without backspin it's really hard to hit anything close to front pins without de-lofting, going short and running it up... but that's getting a little O/T.

The question remains - should I even bother looking at new irons at this point?

I've demo'ed quite a few other brands as well as new Pings - I can hit them all just fine and the tech is so competitive they just all seem to blend in with one another.

Back when I bought the Ping G2s - they really stood out to me with better feel.  With the steel shafts they are heavier than most irons out there right now - doesn't bother me though.

What is to be gained in upgrading?  More spin?  BACKspin?

I guess what I'm wondering the most is - at what point do your grooves "wear out"?

A 7+ year old set with 100+ rounds/year + practices = worn out?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

If they work for you and you are comfy with them stick with em. Rory changed irons recently, how's it working out for him? My irons are 17 years old and the new irons I have tried out in a simulator don't work any better for me at all. Pings are high quality irons...I doubt there is much groove wear at this point. Besides the purpose of grooves is to funnel water off the face of the club when the grass is trapped between it and the ball. That's it. Like the tread on a tire, it gives the water squeezed out of the grass, after  a 3000 psi whack, a place to go so the ball doesn't skid up the face of the club without spinning on impact. If not in the grass then almost all of the spin comes from the slope of the club. The greater the slope the greater the spin.  Remember..the most important part of golfing is the golfer...if you hit the ball well you can stick with what you have, like a good old friend. IMHO anyway.

PS Francis Ouimet won the 1913 US Open with a set of worn out rock chipped clubs...he shot a  playoff score of 72 in the rain to beat the two best golfers in the world at the time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by golfingal

The question remains - should I even bother looking at new irons at this point?

There are a few good reasons...

1. Help the economy

2. Have the latest bling

3. Have a back-up set

In reality, I can't think of a really good reason. I played 845s for 16 years and then gave them to my son. There is nothing wrong with those clubs, but I happened to want a change. The way you are able to work the ball and score, the way you have your distances nailed down, it just doesn't make sense unless you can find something to benefit your game. You already have what most people are looking for with control, feel, and accuracy. What else is there? Good luck.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also in the same boat as the OP. I was always curious what kind of technological advancement that differentiate newer iron sets with older one. Golf clubs isn't a computer that doubles in advancement every 18 months. Also, many of us are tempted to simply buy what everyone else seems to be buying or what Rory/Tiger currently playing.

I bought my clubs from eBay/Gumtree used (see my sig). I made a commitment with myself not to buy any club until I'm able to lower my handicap by at least 5 points. But I'm willing to spend a lot of time (and some money) to get a proper lesson from pro. Do you think it will detrimental to my game?

How long does it take to decide whether this clubs is "work" for you? Do you think that newer clubs are better in adapting with different players? Or is it the player that have to adapt their body movement to the clubs?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say you definitely don't need new irons, and the way you describe how your current set works says you don't even want them. It is hard to resist considering a switch with all the latest and greatest coming out...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I say go for it, what the hell. It may not improve your score, or give backspin on the greens but having a new set is like having a new car. I have a set of Ping Eye 2s that I played for years, no they didn't wear out, I just wanted a new set of Pings. And no they didn't help my score but I love the clubs. I still play the Ping Eye 2s just for fun, they are still great clubs.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      No problem.  I'm not tired of responding to sincere and thoughtful posts, like yours, even if it rehashes stuff from before because OF COURSE it is unrealistic to expect people to read 3000 posts before commenting.  In any case I have that quote in a file and it was simple to post it - much simpler and politer than saying "go find it , it's here."  I DO think that one should maybe at least read a smattering of such a big thread before jumping in,   But I have no patience whatsoever with the "I saw Jack play" and "he was nice at a clinic" type posts or posts by people who try to claim some special credibility because of some entirely personal subjective connection.  But that isn't you. As to the rest, you asked for the exact quote and I gave it to you.  If you want to argue with what he said, that is another matter and does not concern me, since my position is that even if we, arguendo, say that the field strengths did NOT get better, Tiger's career was so much more dominant than Jack's that it doesn't matter.  I don't NEED to make a stronger field argument to make the case that Tiger dominated golf in a way and to an extent that no other golfer has ever dominated golf.  And he did it for 15 years (after an absolutely unprecedented career as an amateur) which, IMO, is long enough that it no longevity argument could overcome the sheer dominance advantage his career embodied.   The fact that all that is true in the face of field strength increasing is just icing on the cake.   
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Excellent. Thank you for re-posting that quote. Sorry to hear you're tired of rehashing. Why not just let the thread die then? Is the expectation that folks will read all 272 pages before making a comment? That strikes me as an unrealistic expectation.. I agree the tour is tougher than it used to be. I consider the differences more incremental than astronomical...not the 'order of magnitude' range that seems to come through in some comments. I think Jack is both being accurate in assessing his perception of a shift in quality, but also exaggerating for effect or experiencing present-day myopia at the very least about the money. $100 in 1962 money would be ~ $800 dollars today. Not exactly what I would call bus fare. The 'paltry' $100,000 had the buying power of about $800,000 in today's dollars, which is ~ 60% of today's average purse and ~ 30% of the Players' purse).. Most Americans would happily take an annual salary like that today. They weren't getting ditch digger wages. The prize money even then definitely attracted keen competitive interest. Clearly purses have also grown more than inflation and even journeyman make more in a year than the top 10 in 1962 (below), but it seems about in line with the growth of the population of golfers in the U.S. itself - about triple since Jack's day, Endorsement money has definitely gotten bigger, as the tour and the golf marketplace have developed and expanded over time.   Rank       Player                  1962 $                   2015 $ 1            Arnold Palmer        $81,448                 $639,223 2            Gene Littler           $66,201                 $519,562 3            Jack Nicklaus         $61,869                 $485,563 4            Billy Casper            $61,842                 $485,351 5            Bob Goalby            $46,241                 $362,910 6            Gary Player            $45,838                 $359,748 7            Doug Sanders        $43,340                 $340,143 8            Dave Ragan          $37,327                 $292,951 9            Bobby Nichols       $34,312                 $269,288 10          Phil Rodgers          $32,182                 $252,572  
    • Claim Your Achievements Here!
      Broke par, Lowest Score Wins. 
    • Disadvantage of too stiff a flex?
      I've often thought about going with an X flex driver shaft.  I may get an adapter from My Titleist 910 and experiment.
    • Claim Your Achievements Here!
      I'd like to claim the "Broke 80" award, as I managed this for the first time December 28th last year.   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 OUT Gross 5 4 4 5 5 3 5 5 5 41(41) Par 4 4 3 5 4 3 4 4 5 36 Distance 353 357 168 465 312 142 389 339 492 3017 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 IN TOTAL 5 4 4 4 5 3 5 4 4 38(38) 79 (79) 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 35 71 479 356 323 355 396 185 309 136 365 2904 5921               Thanks!        
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. TessaEdin
      TessaEdin
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries