Jump to content
IGNORED

Any reviews on the Bushnell Neo Plus GPS watch?


Note: This thread is 3989 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Most concerned about the battery life. Anyone own this Bushnell GPS watch?  Online reviews say it generally lasts a few rounds before charging, but I'm skeptical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I've got the Bushnell Neo Plus GPS unit. Not sure how similar they are but I'd make these comments:

1. Battery life is good, I reckon it's probably good for 3 or 4 rounds.

2. Data is bullshit rubbish bad. Bushnell hooks up with the igolf database. They say 27000 courses preloaded or whatever. Of the 20 different courses I've played since I got this (4 months ago) I reckon that nearly ALL have been inaccurate on a couple of holes or more. These include courses in Australia and Spain. Tech support are happy to take cards and remeasure but then there's a messy update function (you have to do it course by course, so what's happening with all the other updates they are presumably also doing?) and even then it's still wrong and the advice is to "redo the update".

I'd be interested to hear if others have the same experience and where they are based (Many US based companies do a great job in the US but quality falls over once you leave).

Footnote if you go ahead:

Their instructions are worng/out of date. When you're updating courses use Internet Explorer 8 or 9 but NOT the 64 bit version (use the 32 bit version).

There's a plugin you'll probably need to add. Good luck with that, it's a bitch.

You don't go to www.igolf.com like they say, go www.bushnell.igolf.com

All annoying niggles.

I want a user friendly product that is accurate, not mostly OK if you finesse it right. I do not recommend the NEO Plus.

Are you listening Bushnell?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...
Update. Picked one of these up and used it in a tournament last Sunday. Not only were playing partners impressed but the yardage was accurate and lasted the whole round full battery life. A++
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by TJBam

Update. Picked one of these up and used it in a tournament last Sunday. Not only were playing partners impressed but the yardage was accurate and lasted the whole round full battery life. A++

Thanks, I have been looking at these watches wondering about the batteries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...
Three rounds in and it is still3/4 battery life. Hasn't touched the charger since its first full charge when I first got it. Pretty impressive.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3989 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I think I like this hole.  It is a clear "Risk-Reward" choice.  Since most of the shots in your cone cleared the bunkers I would say they are a minor risk and not a big issue.  Playing the aggressive line may give you 70ish yards in from what looks to be playable rough while conservative play is 120ish from fairway.  I know you said 70 vs 120 is minor for you but how does the approach angle in impact your results?  I figure both strategies are playing for Birdie since holing out from either is mostly luck. Looking at your proximity hole I think it says @ 50 feet when hitting from the fairway from 100-150 and 40 feet if hitting 50-100 from the rough.  Neither of those is an easy birdie putt.   I like the approach angle from the rough between the bunkers & the adjacent tees over the angle from @ 120 in the fairway but I really do not like the idea of hitting onto the adjacent tee boxes and that may impact my confidence with making the shot.  Also, too far left may be a worse approach angle then from the fairway short of the bunkers. For me this may come down to how confident do I feel when I reach that tee box.  If I am stroking it well off the tee leading up to the hole I would try for over the bunkers and the better angle in but if I am struggling that day I would likely opt for the fairway to take more bad stuff out of play.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨🟨🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,035 1/6 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Finally. Been waiting for this.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨⬜🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩    
    • 🏅.. First ace??
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...