Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
cnl390

What is the correct way to fix a fade?

10 posts in this topic

I have just begun playing again after quite a few years and find that with my drivers I am hitting somewhere between a fade and slice.  I just came back from the range where a guy told me I was falling back during my swing and told me position my back foot like I had a golf ball under my heel and that would correct the falling back.  I tried it and even though it felt very weird it actually works.

Now my question is, is this really the right way to correct my fade or is it a novelty type of remedy?

Thanks,

Charles

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I think one question you want to ask yourself is why you want to fix it.  I have a fade myself, but I want to fix it not because I think a draw is better (I don't, I think a fade can be a better ball and more reliable than a draw), but because the way I'm hitting the ball I am not coming from the inside enough, and I'm coming over the top on my downswing. I have too many compensations that worked for a while, that aren't working now, and that need to be addressed, and I'm trying to address them as well as I can.

Falling back may contribute to an improper impact position (weight isn't forward enough), but it may not the real reason you're slicing.  I imagine that thinking you have an object under your foot (ball, sponge, etc), helps to brace your right leg in your back swing so you don't sway (re: steady head).  I've been personally playing with that idea by pushing my right knee in about an inch before I took my club head back.  I then felt as if I was stacked with all of my weight being centered over my instep , rather than my weight falling to the outside of my foot (still a work in progress).    It may or may not work for you, talk to your pro about it.

It may be a permanent solution if your swing path/club head position at impact/alignment are all promoting a draw, and falling back was the only reason that your club head would have been diverted of it's original track (I would think that a slightly open face at impact, but the club head diverting at impact to the left instead of keeping it's course.  If someone better at biomechanics could contemplate this, maybe I'm dead wrong :) ).

I think my point is that even though your swing thought has given you better results, it may not be the primary culprits of your fade/slice.  It's something that an instructor/Trackman/video analysis can really pinpoint better than most (get it, GET IT????  I know, I'm an idiot).

Hope this helps, and have fun.

p.s.  I hope the "guy" who told you this isn't some "guy", but rather a PGA Professional whom you trust.  Be careful of unsolicited advice, it could potentially hurt more than help (speaking from experience, I blew up a potential round in the low 80's at a legit course by listening to some dude I got paired with, and subsequently shooting 10 over what I would've if I hadn't paid him any notice).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I need to draw the ball I just use my 3. My driver has a great repeating fade, why mess with a good thing.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Change the swing direction by making sure the weight is forward and the hips are forward at impact.

http://thesandtrap.com/t/29616/the-biggest-secret-slide-your-hips

Look for Key #2 Drills

http://thesandtrap.com/t/61376/5sk-video-thread

Great drill for higher handicap players and beginners.  Those golfers can even play with a similar set-up.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by BirdieNumNums

I like this video, it's how I personally go about hitting either shot.

http://www.pga.com/golf-instruction/instruction-feature/off-tee/how-draw-and-fade-video

Please don't do any of that. Almost all of what he says is the opposite of what you actually want to do in the golf swing.

For example, putting the ball more forward will result in the club's path being farther to the left, and moving the handle back will result in the face pointing left more (and the club's path being left again). He also says tip back away from the target, which can either send the path left or right depending on a few other things.

Yet he says this is how you hit a draw.

If you actually do those things, you'll either hit pull-draws or pull-fades.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would personally die for a power fade. But there are so many reasons to a fade. The swing technique is usually the reason but so too could be the lie angle of your club. Like the guys here have said, having your swing looked it by a certified golf pro is the way to go.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by rowlf

I would personally die for a power fade.

But then how would you hit it???? ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Shit. That's true. Didn't think about it. Thanks for reminding.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guy that I played with today (we were both walk-on singles) had a nice power fade going and must have hit 11 or 12 fairways. Yours truly was hitting them mostly dead straight but only had 6. Our carries were very similar. I'd take his driving over mine any day of the week.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Lowest score you've seen?
      Lowest ive ever witnessed is 71 twice by me.Thats saying something considering I play in tournys with very good players.My 71s were not in tourny conditions though.
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      But because they play on courses that are considered quite difficult compared to the average home course, wouldn't their up & down % be expected to increase due to having closer misses on average - particularly with slower greens to hold approaches? The comment above is not to discount this, but only emphasize how the two go together. If you apply a fantastic long game on a shorter course on average they will have an easier time being more consistent and hitting the ball closer to the pin on average and therefore making more putts. Or do you think they would have the same expected proximity on one of our home courses as they would on the tougher tour courses and setups? I get you on the tournament prep being very different to hitting a course blind, but to some extent the OP is comparing how we play on our home courses day-in, day-out vs. the tour pros moving from place to place. How would we score visiting a course blind relative to our home course where most of the scores are posted and we are very familiar with the layout and greens. Granted pros make it a point to know this stuff with yardage books and memory. Still switching between venues and conditions rather suddenly vs. gradual changes we would tend to experience on a home course must add some difficulty. I came across a good study that analyzed all PGA tournament scores for 2007 including field average adjustments. He had the unadjusted scoring average that year as 70.704. If you figure the average course setup is ~ CR 75 and add one stroke for 'tournament conditions' (and added difficulty of Major setups) then that was about 5.3 strokes below average rating. So relative to a Course Rating (slope should not matter to a pro), and assuming a standard normal distribution, 95% of the scores should range between -6.7 and -3.9 below the rating. However, his analysis detected two interesting features, the curve (with a ton of samples) is approximately symmetric with a ~ .4 skewness. This right skew means the most frequently expected result (the mode) is actually slightly lower than the mean. So that implies that even on tour setups the lower than average scores are expected just a bit more frequently (the left tail and shoulder are slightly thicker and probability for scores lower than the mode slightly higher.). Here's an approximation of what the distribution would look like relative to strokes below the CR. In comparing courses with higher average scores (like the U.S. Open) the study found that the standard deviation of scores increased. The 'tougher test' created more of a separation between the players. Also the players whose scores tended to skew left were poorer players on average in terms of results. They averaged a relatively high score, but they could go really low sometimes. The relevance this has to the thread is that on the easier home courses that most of us tend to play, the tour players would be more bunched in their expected scores with higher probabilities around the mean of -5.3 relative to the CR and possibly more toward the low side with the left-skewing, less-consistent scorers reducing the size of the right tail and extending the left while holding the 'field average' the same. It could skew the distribution toward lower expected score (though the most frequently expected value would still be around the mode). But what would you expect as a total spread for the average scratch population? You agree that with the average population of golfers by handicap there's a decrease in score variability with increasing skill versus the average population at each handicap level having the same average scoring distribution, yes? IMO, the answer to the OP greatly depends on the CR. On my course from the tips, they'd be expected to shoot under 65 over 50% of the time. On a CR of 72, I'd expect  below 67 over 50% of the time. At Oakmont (in non-Open setup), under 73 over 50% of the time. And that would be without accounting for a possible 'going low' effect from the typically easier home course setups we face (not including Oakmont there. They would face some hazards you don't find on tour either - lost balls could be an issue for some. I'm not sure I agree that they'd expect to putt worse due to slower stimps. At the least because I would expect their proximity to the hole to increase on all shots due to the typically shorter length (shorter irons on average into each hole) along with relatively slower, softer greens.
    • What'd You Shoot Today?
      Played 9 holes today and started out pretty good (for me) w/ 5 bogies in a row, then doubled the last four. Still, not a bad round.  
    • Anyone Else Use 'Good Shots' to Measure How Good a Round Was?
      This is what I do as well.  If I play a poor round then there are a lot of these, so I don't really dwell too much, but if I played a good round, then it frequently boiled down to a couple of really good to great shots, a whole bunch of manageable ones, and a couple awful ones.  The awful ones are the ones I feel should be entirely avoidable, so those are the ones I try and recount later and assess what went wrong.
    • My Swing (PumaAttack)
      I have been working with an Evolvr coach for a while and he has not addressed those concerns at a2 and in fact called my position a perfect example and something he would show to other students.  So your instructions do not match up for me.   It is frustrating to hear you make comments like that when they don't match up with what my coach says.   I still don't get why it matters if it goes from shallow to slightly steeper on the downswing.   Look at Furyks swing, is he hitting all the key positions?  If I hit A5 to A6 why does A3 matter anymore? If Robert Rock had the same angle at 5 as he does at 3 he would miss the ball too..  What is the difference in steep to shallow?  OR shallow to steep, but still outside the ball?  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bigtosh90
      bigtosh90
      (26 years old)
    2. dopplegvnger
      dopplegvnger
      (24 years old)
    3. Frank62
      Frank62
      (54 years old)
  • Blog Entries